Home On TV & Video Preparing For A Robust Addressable TV Advertising Marketplace

Preparing For A Robust Addressable TV Advertising Marketplace

SHARE:

ranyng-updatedOn TV And Video” is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in programmatic TV and video.

Today’s column is written by Rany Ng, director of product management for video advertising at DoubleClick by Google.

Addressable advertising has been a topic of much discussion at this year’s NAB Show. The ability to show different ads to different households while they are watching the same program, addressable TV advertising is an innovation that could completely change the dynamics of the TV advertising marketplace.

While large broadcast events such as the World Cup, Super Bowl and Oscars might continue to thrive without addressable advertising, there are thousands of programs across hundreds of channels where addressable TV advertising can make a big difference for advertisers, programmers and viewers.

To envision how the ads in everyday TV programs will become more valuable, we need to look beyond the period we’re in now – where very little TV inventory is addressable – and assume that a majority of all TV inventory will eventually be addressable across traditional linear TV and premium online video.

The industry can prepare for a marketplace where a majority of TV inventory is addressable by taking several actions related to investment, waste, media buyers and measurement.

Invest In Data As A Differentiator

Advertisers will look to apply more data to their TV campaigns than just age, gender and geography. Some will want to leverage their own data. Others will lean on media sellers to provide unique data, such as behavioral data on television consumption, in order to target light vs. heavy viewers or movie watchers vs. sports watchers. The possibilities are endless. So, the investments you make in data today will help you run smart TV campaigns or sell smart media tomorrow.

Understand Waste So You Can Minimize It

Advertisers can use addressable TV advertising to avoid reaching the wrong people with the wrong message. However, this requires a good understanding of who the “wrong people” are. Advertisers can prepare for addressability by better understanding who their specific target audiences are, who doesn’t respond to their campaigns and who makes an unprofitable customer.

Media sellers can prepare for addressability by understanding the opposite for all of their advertisers. They should know who does responds to each advertiser’s campaigns and who makes a profitable customer for each advertiser. These are the audiences that broadcasters and publishers should invest in.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Get To Know ‘New-to-TV’ Buyers

With addressability, TV advertising becomes useful to more advertisers, such as those with a niche product for a niche audience. As non-TV advertisers and light TV advertisers catch on to the fine-tuned positive and negative targeting that’s available with addressable TV advertising, the total number of TV advertisers will grow. This opens up a sales opportunity for media sellers and a job market for media buyers.

Pursue Custom, Not Universal, Measurement For Now

The industry has been calling for universal measurement that will allow buyers and sellers to evaluate traditional linear TV and premium streaming video on a comparable basis. However, the most standardized tool in the measurement toolkit, C3 and C7 television ratings, requires a static ad load.

As long as this limitation remains, the industry is more likely to leverage competing measurement currencies on a campaign-by-campaign basis to define the metrics that guide the transactions between buyers and sellers. For example, buyers and sellers may use viewability metrics, brand lift metrics or census-based impression counts to guide transactions.

If the industry takes these four steps, it won’t take long before the majority of all TV inventory becomes addressable across traditional linear TV and premium streaming video. When that happens, even the largest advertisers will buy addressable ads to reach their specific audiences, while consumers will benefit from more relevant ads.

Addressable advertising will be good for large advertisers because it offers them a better way to take segmented products to market. For example, credit card companies can reach different types of card holders, such as travelers, business owners and students, with different offers.

TV viewers will benefit too as they are exposed to things they’re interested in and passionate about during commercial breaks and less exposure to things that have no utility or value to them.

A predominantly addressable future is closer than we think because there are already technologies that support addressable advertising for both over-the-top (OTT) and linear television. Soon enough, the question won’t be, “Can we transact on an addressable basis?” It will be, “Do we want to transact on an addressable basis?”

Follow DoubleClick (@doubleclick) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.