Home Digital TV and Video Waiting For The Addressable Online Video Ad Business

Waiting For The Addressable Online Video Ad Business

SHARE:

Addressable VideoAt first blush, recent acquisitions in the video ad network space give the appearance the video ad business is on fire – in a good way.

But, digging deeper, it seems that exits may not be happening at the levels first imagined for some video ad network entrepreneurs and investors as there have been quite a few entrants flooding the category and, except for a few working on differentiation through technology, the only other real differentiation seems to be scale. And, it’s no wonder scale is important as all anyone ever hears about is the incredibly high CPMs in online video ads.

From here, there appears to be three factors involved in the high CPMs:

  • Engagement – As everyone knows, having to sit through a 15 second pre-roll ad is a very different experience than viewing (for an instant) a graphical display ad which might be to the side or above the website content.
  • It’s Like TV – Online video ads remind the marketers and their agencies of television and buying TV spots. This mindset creates tons of demand especially as the marketer struggles to follow the user online.  Much to their detriment, marketers and agencies often use TV spots for online video ads without any customization for the Web.
  • Scarcity – There just isn’t a lot of available, non-guaranteed video ad inventory unless you’re willing to use the social network world’s supply of sometimes questionable, non-brand-safe content.

As long as the video ad campaign is providing overall reach in this limited, online video ad universe, it appears marketers are willing to spend top dollar.  But shouldn’t the real goal be addressable video advertising which uses demand-side platform-like buying technology, looks more at the user and cookie-level data, and targets accordingly? You know… audience buying!?

And, on top of audience buying, how about cross-channel attribution? Video ad targeting should ideally take into account the separate viewing of display advertisements from the same campaign, for example, and understand how the two digital marketing channels affect each other on the way to the final conversion.

Not Yet

It’s just too “early days” for most addressable video since there’s limited inventory and even more limited audience targeting opportunity.  The video ad network and the publisher will still be offering website placement, vertical channels and context for the forseeable future as opposed to targeting through a deeper understanding of attribution or intent. It feels like display a few years ago when supply was more limited and the long tail wasn’t as long.

To be sure, companies are moving into the addressable media space for online video. But today’s limited supply continues to preclude the need to go very deep. Display’s over abundance of supply bred innovation. When will it crossover to online video?  In part, when marketers become more comfortable with their brands in social media’s video and as the web user continues to consume more video online – and, finally, IP brings the web to the TV.  Also, if comScore released a study called “Natural Born Viewers” (echoing “Natural Born Clickers“) that might have people looking beyond “the view” and into cross-channel attribution.

By John Ebbert

Must Read

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure to create an isolated computing environment for ad targeting and measurement. It will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.

Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.