Home Data-Driven Thinking Why The Government And Digital Ad Companies Must Come Together

Why The Government And Digital Ad Companies Must Come Together

SHARE:
Leigh Freund, president & CEO, NAI

When it comes to policies that impact how ads are delivered online, change is in the air.

Multiple state consumer privacy laws are now in effect. Congress is considering major privacy legislation. The Federal Trade Commission has embarked on sweeping privacy and data protection rulemaking.

And President Biden recently called on both political parties to “unite against Big Tech abuses.”

But change – even change that restricts data collection or use – doesn’t have to be a negative for digital advertisers and the millions of small businesses that rely on tailored advertising to reach audiences interested in their services. 

Working together to create change

Leading policymakers and responsible members of the advertising industry are aligned on key goals. Our shared vision includes giving people meaningful control over their personal data, placing enhanced restrictions on the use of sensitive precise location and health-care data and banning targeted advertising to children. 

We also believe that data-driven advertising can and should drive free and low-cost digital media for consumers and help small businesses reach niche or local audiences and compete with larger corporations.

To make that vision a lasting reality, advertising industry stakeholders should partner with legislators and regulators to develop and implement smart, practical laws and regulations. There should be a role for responsible organizations in the ad tech space to share information about new technology and business practices, and to help disseminate and interpret rules of the road developed by government agencies. 

Unfortunately, the discourse between industry and policymakers has devolved into name-calling. That isn’t productive, whether it’s using a misnomer like “surveillance” to describe tools to deliver tailored ads or labeling people with different policy approaches “extremists.” 

Since 2000, NAI members have pledged to follow specific best practices for data collection and use. As federal and state privacy rules evolve, we are committed to helping our members best understand and comply with them. 

Ideally, we will do this in partnership with federal and state regulators. As technology and business practices rapidly evolve, guidance from industry associations, developed with input from government officials, will have an impact much faster than regulation or legislation alone.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

We’ve been advocating for new privacy rules that maximize competition across the digital advertising ecosystem by focusing more precisely on the harmful uses of data, and the implementation of data stewardship requirements across all of industry, rather than seeking broad limitations on data sharing with service providers and third parties for advertising and marketing. Focusing only on data sharing unfairly empowers the largest platforms.

Of course, addressing consumer privacy won’t solve every problem related to how we interact with technology and each other online. Proposed privacy laws and rules won’t necessarily address free speech issues, how algorithms drive the delivery of content via social media or concerns about the concentration of political or economic power in a few gatekeeper companies. 

In fact, recently enacted state privacy laws – and most proposed laws – will greatly favor large platforms by protecting companies that both collect and use consumer data, rather than sharing it with other companies. 

A call for unity on privacy

 We’re proud of our history of working collaboratively with policymakers at all levels, and leading companies that care about respecting privacy and delivering relevant advertising to empower the data-driven economy, without sacrificing individual autonomy. And we’re reaching out our hand to policymakers and regulators to build consensus around solutions that promote the productive role advertising can play for people, small businesses, the economy and society. 

Collaboration between industry and government is the only way forward.

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Follow the NAI and AdExchanger on LinkedIn.

For more articles featuring Leigh Freund, click here.

Must Read

Why Big Brand Price Increases Will Flatten Ad Budgets

Product prices and marketing budgets are flip sides of the same coin. But the phase-in effects of tariffs, combined with vicissitudes of global weather and commodity production, challenge that truism.

The IAB Tech Lab Isn’t Pulling Any Punches In The Fight Against AI Scraping

IAB Tech Lab CEO Anthony Katsur didn’t mince his words when declaring unauthorized generative AI scraping of publisher content “theft, full stop.”

Comic: Gamechanger (Google lost the DOJ's search antitrust case)

Here’s Who’s Testifying During The Remedy Phase Of Google’s Ad Tech Antitrust Trial

Last week, the DOJ and Google filed their respective witness lists and the exhibit lists for the remedy phase of the ad tech antitrust trial. Lots of familiar faces!

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

MX8 Labs Launches With A Plan To Speed Up The Survey-Based Research Biz

What’s the point of a market research survey that could take weeks, when consumer sentiment is rollercoasting up and down every day? That’s the problem MX8 Labs aims to tackle.

Closeup image bag of money and judge gavel. Lawsuit, auction, bribe and penalty concept.

The LG Ads Legal Saga Continues With A Fresh Suit, This Time Against Kroll

Alphonso co-founder Lampros Kalampoukas is suing Kroll for allegedly undervaluing the company by nearly $100 million to aid LG Electronics in a shareholder dispute.