Home Data-Driven Thinking Privacy, DTCs And How Marketing Failed

Privacy, DTCs And How Marketing Failed

SHARE:

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Scott Martino, vice president of digital investment at Blue 449.

The commitment to data privacy took a big step a few weeks ago when Google announced changes to the Chrome browser by allowing consumers to track and restrict third-party cookies and cross-site tracking cookies. Developers who declare to Google that their cookie is cross-site will be able to use it for users that have not opted out.

That last point is a critical one, as it means that developers that work to establish good relationships with their customers will be the ones that succeed in this new world of tracking and utilization. It will increase the amount of higher quality data within the ecosystem, which will likely recalibrate to a few good and compliant companies.

But what has been interesting for me in this whole situation is how it bears striking similarity to the growth and proliferation of direct-to-consumer (DTC) brands. Both of these scenarios are predicated on one thing: a good, direct relationship with the consumer.

As third-party tracking continues to be whittled away, it will become all the more important for brands to establish relationships with their customers and be transparent about the ways they use their data. This is where the DTC brands have succeeded: by cutting out the distributors and middlemen that historically owned those relationships.

DTCs are side-stepping the typical distribution channels and going direct to their customers, all the while capturing their customers’ trust in giving them something back for being a direct customer. And the trend continues to expand into legacy areas of transaction. This is what Tesla is trying to do in the automotive world, challenging the traditional dealer model and going directly to the customer. This has prompted some backlash, for sure, but has also prompted some OEMs to start an online selling practice.

The critical element to success, not just in the DTC world but in the data sharing and utilization space, is that reciprocity. And this is where the advertising and marketing industry failed. And I don’t just mean brands, agencies or ad tech – I mean everyone!

The push for ROI in marketing during the rise of programmatic necessitated that more data be used to inform how ads were served. And in that rise we found a way to track consumer behavior and use it to serve more relevant advertising and content to the point where people now expect things to be tailored to them.

But, we didn’t communicate that to consumers.

There was never a large-scale effort to tell people that what we were doing was going to benefit them, that we were going to take the irrelevance out of advertising, that their behaviors would actually help us understand what products they wanted, that every time they went to their favorite site it would serve them bespoke content. Sure, there were going to be issues – the diaper mailer from Target is the most famous – but in the end, that targeting actually was accurate. But it didn’t have a privacy element attached to it, and there was no reciprocity.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Instead, all consumers heard were the bad stories that were associated with data and tracking. Data breaches, Facebook and Cambridge Analytica, the Experian data breach, the 2016 US presidential election – all of this bad news shaped consumers’ perception of data-collection practices.

And so, here we are, trying to make a correction after years of operating an ecosystem that has transformed the way we advertise. Transparency is a good thing: People need to know how their data is used and what benefit they receive from it. And brands should work to cultivate those relationships and show their consumers how their data can benefit them.

Our evolution here is a good thing, but when the next innovation in advertising comes along, the advertising industry needs to advertise it.

Follow Scott Martino (@ScottMartino13), Blue 449 (@blue449) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Tagged in:

Must Read

The IAB Formalizes Its Measurement Initiatives Under Its New ‘Project Eidos’

The IAB unveiled its Project Eidos on Monday, a new program uniting its numerous measurement initiatives under one banner.

John Gentry, CEO, OpenX

‘I Am A Lucky And Thankful Man’: Remembering OpenX CEO John ‘JG’ Gentry

To those who knew him, John “JG” Gentry wasn’t just a CEO. He was a colleague who showed up with genuine care and curiosity.

Prebid Takes Over AdCP’s Code For Creating Sell-Side AI Agents

The group that turned header bidding software into an open standard is bringing the same approach to publisher-side AI agents.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Meta logo seen on smartphone and AI letters on the background. Concept for Meta Facebook Artificial Intelligence. Stafford, UK, May 2, 2023

Meta Bets That Its Ad Machine Can Fund Its AI Dreams

Meta is channeling its booming ad revenue into a $135 billion AI drive to power its “personal superintelligence” future.

Comic: Header Bidding Rapper (Wrapper!)

Microsoft To Stop Caching Prebid Video Files, Leaving Publishers With A Major Ad Serving Problem

Most publishers have no idea that a major part of their video ad delivery will stop working on April 30, shortly after Microsoft shuts down the Xandr DSP.

AdExchanger's Big Story podcast with journalistic insights on advertising, marketing and ad tech

Guess Its AdsGPT Now?

Ads were going to be a “last resort” for ChatGPT, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman promised two years ago. Now, they’re finally here. Omnicom Digital CEO Jonathan Nelson joins the AdExchanger editorial team to talk through what comes next.