Home Data-Driven Thinking Is Marketing Personal Or Business? Can It Be Both?

Is Marketing Personal Or Business? Can It Be Both?

SHARE:

bengoldmanData-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Ben Goldman, vice president of digital data solutions and partnerships at Infogroup Targeting Solutions.

There has long been a divide in the school of thought between consumer and business marketing. For decades, marketers have been split between two very different camps: B2C and B2B. There was no crossover or middle ground. It was A or B.

This staunch dichotomy created a marketing environment that inadvertently assigned real people multiple personas. The separation makes sense if you only consider the product and sales cycle differences between the two.

But when you look beyond those factors and think of buyers as individuals, a different story emerges. Just because someone is at work doesn’t mean they completely disassociate from their home life. And people don’t always leave work at the office, especially now in our always-connected world where we are a click away from a work-related email.

Is it possible for marketing to bridge the gap and let go of preconceived notions?

Two Camps

Traditionally, B2B marketing focused on organizations represented by individuals spending company dollars. B2C marketing targets individuals who are buying for themselves with personal resources.

Consumer choices tend to be more spontaneous and emotionally triggered. Business purchase decisions usually have mechanisms in place to minimize the emotional component of buying decisions. Tack on the responsibility of spending corporate money and it’s a whole different ball game.

Even though there is a definite distinction between how the two investment decision types are made, there is one constant aspect: People are making the decisions, regardless of whether they are at home or at the office.

B2C marketers have always touted their advanced, innovative ways of thinking, which tends to be more progressive than B2B marketing. B2C marketers quickly delved into digital by mastering search, retargeting and programmatic display faster than many B2B marketers. But their method was flawed because it considered consumers to be one big audience. Recently B2C marketers started to focus on reaching specific people.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

B2B marketers evolved from demand-generation experts who use long-form content to promote products. B2B marketers now concentrate on the customer journey. They focus on ROI and understand what is necessary to drive engagement as they move leads through the pipeline. Their tactics may not be as advanced but they have turned a common marketing tool into a strategic cornerstone.

B2B marketers have taken using data in their targeting efforts to the next level with account-based marketing, which hypertargets specific employees at specific companies that are in-market. By using data to strategically identify the right companies on specific channels, B2B marketers greatly improve their targeting. Many B2C companies are recognizing this and exploring how digital deterministic data can help them reach specific people rather than the general masses.

Combining Data Sources

People-based marketing may be considered the consumer counterpart to account-based marketing because it focuses on reaching devices and individuals rather than general audiences. Applying it across the marketing spectrum to include both B2B and B2C efforts was previously not possible.

Data is the key. The ability to recognize a person in their entirety – their professional persona in conjunction with their consumer persona – suddenly reveals the CFO responsible for making big-ticket buying decisions for a company is also the frugal dad trying to find the best vacation option for his family. Traditionally, the information to tie these disparate profiles together would not have been associated and many platforms would have considered them to be two very different people.

Combining firmographic data with demographic data offers complete insights into the work-life balance that exists within everyone. Marketers can do this in a few ways.

For example, say a marketer wants to target men who have the financial capacity and business need to purchase upscale suits. The ideal target audience may be affluent executives working in finance. To reach this audience, the agency would use its demand-side platform (DSP) to blend third-party B2B audience data, such as SIC codes for the finance and banking industries, with B2C audience data, including household income or affluence proxy. These combined segments can be created across most DSPs.

Or an electronic company may want to promote a high-ticket product during the holiday season. Realizing that parents often purchase gifts while at work, the marketer wants to display the ads for their consumer target while they are at work. The marketer could first leverage the analytic functions of its data management platform (DMP) to understand the business and consumer profile of current customers. Using the intelligence gleaned, the marketer would create the appropriate acquisition audience segment within the DMP and push it to their DSP for execution.

Looking at the tactics of people-based marketing and account-based marketing, a pattern emerges of driving engagement through proper targeting. The ability to combine B2B and B2C data to eliminate missing behaviors or attributes can help brands achieve the holy grail of marketing: to deliver the right message to the right audience at the right time. And that’s not just business, it’s personal.

Follow Infogroup (@Infogroup) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Albert Thompson, Managing Director, Digital at Walton Isaacson

To Cure What Ails Digital Advertising, Marketers And Publishers Must Get Back To Basics

Albert Thompson, a buy-side veteran with 20+ years of experience, weighs in on attention metrics, the value of MFA sites, brand safety backlash and how publishers can improve their inventory.

A comic depiction of Google's ad machine sucking money out of a publisher.

DOJ vs. Google, Day Five Rewind: Prebid Reality Check, Unfair Rev Share And Jedi Blue (Sorta)

Someone will eventually need to make a Netflix-style documentary about the Google ad tech antitrust trial happening in Virginia. (And can we call it “You’ve Been Ad Served?”)

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.