Home Data-Driven Thinking Learning To Love Remnant

Learning To Love Remnant

SHARE:

Data-Driven Thinking“Data-Driven Thinking” is a column written by members of the media community and containing fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Amiad Solomon, Founder & President at Peer39.

Look up the word “remnant” in a dictionary and you’ll find definitions that pretty accurately describe how the word is used in any situation. Except one. In the online advertising world, remnant is not “a small part”, or a “fragment”, and it’s certainly not a “scrap” of anything. Online advertising’s dirty little secret is that remnant represents the vast bulk of available online impressions. For some well-known publishers, the great majority of their inventory is unsold, unloaded, and unloved.

It has become fairly clear from the recent and ongoing growth of innovative networks, DSPs and yield optimizers that many publishers have chosen to make their non-directly sold inventory available to the highest, or sometimes lowest, bidder. Till the emergence of these platforms, content owners were stuck getting very low CPMs on the majority of their content as long as their ad spots were filled.

And on the other side of the equation, many marketers are still willing to purchase ad placements with no data or transparency. They are resigned to the 80/20 rule. The concept is that a small minority of highly targeted ad impressions usually drive the vast majority of attributed conversion activity. Brands buy in to the notion that in order to generate their desired consumer engagement and achieve the appropriate performance from their ads, they must take up the majority of their ad buys with low-value, poorly targeted ad spots to promote branding, and they expect very little activity from those ads.

This practice is outdated. Content targeting systems today can offer actionable data and insights on oceans of impressions across massive inventory networks. There is no need for advertisers to waste impressions and for content owners to delegate a significant chunk of inventory to the remnant bucket with no hope of serious monetization. Brands can see significant conversions from that mass of impressions, by infusing them with helpful data and making them more relevant and valuable.

Publishers and brands should change the way they approach remnant. As soon as inventory is labeled as remnant, there emerges a defeatist attitude which says “I cannot monetize on this inventory.” Instead, think of it as mass targeting. Most of the inventory in the remnant bucket today has value that is just beginning to be exploited. Rather than focusing only on further refining the targeting of the “20%”, all players in the advertising ecosystem, from publishers to advertisers, should widen their focus on getting the most out of their entire inventory.

Follow Peer39 (@SemanticizeMe) and AdExchanger.com (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Albert Thompson, Managing Director, Digital at Walton Isaacson

To Cure What Ails Digital Advertising, Marketers And Publishers Must Get Back To Basics

Albert Thompson, a buy-side veteran with 20+ years of experience, weighs in on attention metrics, the value of MFA sites, brand safety backlash and how publishers can improve their inventory.

A comic depiction of Google's ad machine sucking money out of a publisher.

DOJ vs. Google, Day Five Rewind: Prebid Reality Check, Unfair Rev Share And Jedi Blue (Sorta)

Someone will eventually need to make a Netflix-style documentary about the Google ad tech antitrust trial happening in Virginia. (And can we call it “You’ve Been Ad Served?”)

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.