Home Data-Driven Thinking Journey Mapping Fail

Journey Mapping Fail

SHARE:

leahvanzelmData-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Leah van Zelm, vice president at Merkle.

Those in the people-based marketing business know that customer journey mapping “quick guides” abound. But beware: Their overly simplistic nature can lead marketers astray.

The term “journey map” is used to mean so many different things that marketers must be very clear on their objectives and expectations before getting started. Journey maps may refer to any depiction of the progressive relationship between a customer and a brand. They can be very high-level or incredibly detailed.

Until a marketer’s objectives are clear, aligning on the optimal approach and output will not be possible. Many people are leveraging journey mapping, but they aren’t all doing the same thing and many are quite superficial in nature.

Over time, as I’ve studied many of these guides, feature articles, white papers and other types of thought leadership, I have discovered a number of myths and potential pitfalls. Inattention puts marketers at risk of building a flawed experience, creating inefficiencies and experiencing a great deal of frustration.

A ‘Tool To Improve The Customer Experience’

Journey mapping is not a tool; it’s an activity to align a brand vision with customer needs. Journey mapping itself does not improve the experience – it takes a coordinated effort to truly improve the customer experience. Sounds pithy, but many organizations start and stop with a journey map, failing to activate it.

It’s critical to consider adoption and activation once journey mapping is complete. This may come in the form of socialization efforts, business requirements, message playbooks, interaction maps, business rule refinement or a host of other follow-up activities.

‘Let’s Walk In The Shoes Of Our Customer’

While it’s valuable to assume the customer’s perspective for many tasks, building a journey map solely based on employee empathy is dangerous. In a 2014 study, the more employees were asked to “walk in the shoes of the customer,” the worse they became at predicting consumer preference.

Moral of the story: Use data, analytics and research to inform the journey.

‘Start With A Persona’

When developing a journey, marketers should start with understanding the demographics, income, psychographics and attitudes of their core customer, right? These items are great for painting a picture of the customer. The problem is using that picture to make inferences on the ideal journey can be plain wrong because it requires us to rely on conventional wisdom.

Don’t make these inferences. Instead, marketers should start with a persona that illuminates their customer’s motivations of decisions across the brand relationship.

Moral of the story: Use data, analytics and research to inform the journey.

‘Journeys Aren’t Linear’

While brands would like consumers to think and behave linearly across the marketing and sales funnel, consumers are human. However, depicting a nonlinear journey can get messy. It’s best to simply agree that the customer can progress or digress at any point rather than depicting each loop back.

‘Journey Maps Are For B2C Brands’

Business buyers are human, too, and while a B2C decision impacts people personally, B2B decisions impact people both personally and professionally.

“Personal value has two times as much impact as business value does,” according to research from CEB and Google, and “68% of buyers who see a personal value will pay a higher price for a service.”

Journey mapping activities are important to organizations that are committed to aligning consumer and buyer motivations with experience components to support objectives across the life cycle. Like any other initiative, brands must be clear on their specific objectives, the inputs, the outputs and follow-up activation work needed to get value from journey mapping. In particular, brands should consider the level of depth needed.

Regardless of how high level or detailed the focus, use data, analytics and research to inform efforts and to take the guesswork out of the experience design.

Follow Merkle (@merkleCRM) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Tagged in:

Must Read

The Trade Desk’s Revenue Growth Stalls As Big Brands Tighten Their Belts

“Our revenue growth is below our expectations and below the standard we hold ourselves to,” The Trade Desk CEO Jeff Green told investors.

Comic: Measuremints

Nielsen Is Acquiring DoubleVerify For $2.15 Billion

On Thursday, Nielsen entered into a definitive agreement to acquire DoubleVerify in an all cash transaction valued at approximately $2.15 billion.

WBD Hopes To Buoy Linear TV Long Enough For Streaming To Find Its Way

Warner Bros. Discovery cited softer ad sales growth and the continued decline of linear TV as its reasons for missing investor expectations in Q2. Unsurprisingly, streaming ads are the biggest bright spot on WBD’s earnings report card.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: The Mobile Freight Train

AppLovin Asks For Patience As It Grows Its Ecommerce And Consumer Ads Business

“We’re deemed a new bucket, so a testing category,” AppLovin CEO told investors regarding its nascent consumer and ecommerce ads business. “And to graduate up takes time. This stuff compounds over quarters and years.”

Magnite Doesn’t Want To Be A DSP. It Just Wants To Own The Decisioning Layer

On Wednesday, Magnite CEO Michael Barrett painted a picture of a company that’s edging into the buy side by adding more DSP-style capabilities for planning and activation.

For Cuisinart, AI-Generated Ads Are As Handy As A Kitchen Blender

Cuisinart’s marketing team has been eager to take advantage of generative AI-based creative.