Home Data-Driven Thinking How Vanity Metrics Stole Marketing’s Credibility – And How CMOs Can Get It Back

How Vanity Metrics Stole Marketing’s Credibility – And How CMOs Can Get It Back

SHARE:
Ian Baer, Founder & CEO, Sooth
Melissa McGuire, Head of Communications, Sooth

Vanity metrics have been a sugar rush for marketers for nearly two decades, but they’re ultimately unsatisfying. Clicks, likes, page views and time-on-site may look impressive on a dashboard or great in a deck, but they rarely correlate to true success where it matters: revenue, growth and long-term business performance.

These surface-level metrics give a false sense of success. They create feel-good moments that rarely translate into meaningful outcomes. They often provide the basis for misguided decision-making. And even worse, they have eroded marketing’s influence in the boardroom. Vanity metrics frequently mask underperformance and contribute to the growing credibility gap between marketing, business leadership and corporate shareholders.

Currently, only 63% of Fortune 500 companies have a chief marketing officer or similar. This number has declined by 10 points over the past two years. The message is clear: As marketing fails to speak the language of business outcomes, it is increasingly losing its seat at the decision-making table. Flashy numbers often fail to convert into revenue or measurable impact, eroding confidence in the marketing function, particularly among CFOs and other senior leaders.

From engagement to earnings: the metrics that matter

According to McKinsey, marketing often reports high brand awareness and web traffic—yet CFOs later reveal declining sales and profits, suggesting a disconnect between flashy metrics and business reality. Campaigns optimized for reach often sacrifice relevance. Case studies celebrating engagement may overlook conversion. The result is a misalignment between what’s being measured and what truly matters in the boardroom: revenue.

Finance teams don’t care how many people liked a post or visited a page if none of those people became customers. No one is allocating more budget to marketing based on time-on-site or click-through rate. To stay relevant and trusted, marketers need to shift the conversation. That means recentering on business impact, aligning tightly with finance and product teams and rethinking what success means. It’s time to move from activity metrics to outcome metrics.

What we often hear from marketing leaders is, “We have more data than ever, yet we’ve never been less confident in the decisions we’re making.”

Data backs this up with an exclamation point. According to McKinsey, most senior executives say their organizations make poor decisions more often than they make the right ones. The road to budget-slashing, job-eliminating mistakes is paved with vanity metrics, siloed strategies and organizational misalignment. And it has put the credibility of the entire marketing industry on the clock.

The credibility comeback requires alignment

The only solution that matters is a twofold alignment shift. First, organizations must prioritize a single set of truths for marketing decisions. This requires a unified, verified data source to validate decisions, hypotheses and outcomes across marketing, operations, customer service and sales. 

Research published earlier this year indicates that fewer than 5% of executives fully understand their company’s strategic priorities, resulting in an average loss of $122 million per billion dollars of corporate expenditures, or about 12%. So, if everyone gets on the same page regarding the data that’s driving marketing decisions, the result is an instant 12% boost to the bottom line. Compare that to most corporate initiatives on the table today, and a single source of truth represents the most impactful move most companies can make in 2025.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

What follows is the second critical alignment: reducing or eliminating the use of vanity metrics in marketing. No organization should feel confident using data points like increased time on site, response rates, brand awareness or social media engagement to justify their budget. 

We have all the data and tools needed to measure every marketing expenditure in terms of dollars in and dollars out. With a single set of facts, the path becomes clear. The more marketers can show how their efforts directly lead to customer growth, long-term value, sales and referrals (the actual business value of loyalty and advocacy), the more they’ll be included in the room where the budget is allocated—not just the room where it’s handed down.

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Follow Sooth and AdExchanger on LinkedIn.

Must Read

Betrayal, business, deal, greeting, competition concept. Lie deception and corporate dishonesty illustration. Businessmen leaders entrepreneurs making agreement holding concealing knives behind backs.

How PubMatic Countered A Big DSP’s Spending Dip In Q3 (And Our Theory On Who It Was)

In July, PubMatic saw a temporary drop in ad spend from a “large” unnamed DSP partner, which contributed to Q3 revenue of $68 million, a 5% YOY decline.

Paramount Skydance Merged Its Business – Now It’s Ready To Merge Its Tech Stack

Paramount Skydance, which officially turns 100 days old this week, released its first post-merger quarterly earnings report on Monday.

The Arena Group's Stephanie Mazzamaro (left) chats with ad tech consultant Addy Atienza at AdMonsters' Sell Side Summit Austin.

For Publishers, AI Gives Monetizable Data Insight But Takes Away Traffic

Traffic-starved publishers are hopeful that their long-undervalued audience data will fuel advertising’s automated future – if only they can finally wrest control of the industry narrative away from ad tech middlemen.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Q3: The Trade Desk Delivers On Financials, But Is Its Vision Fact Or Fantasy?

The Trade Desk posted solid Q3 results on Thursday, with $739 million in revenue, up 18% year over year. But the main narrative for TTD this year is less about the numbers and more about optics and competitive dynamics.

Comic: He Sees You When You're Streaming

IP Address Match Rates Are a Joke – And It’s No Laughing Matter

According to a new report, IP-to-email matches are accurate just 16% of the time on average, while IP-to-postal matches are accurate only 13% of the time. (Oof.)

Comic: Gamechanger (Google lost the DOJ's search antitrust case)

The DOJ And Google Sharpen Their Remedy Proposals As The Two Sides Prepare For Closing Arguments

The phrase “caution is key” has become a totem of the new age in US antitrust regulation. It was cited this week by both the DOJ and Google in support of opposing views on a possible divestiture of Google’s sell-side ad exchange.