Home Data-Driven Thinking Beyond Inferred Or Declared Mobile Data: Trust, But Verify

Beyond Inferred Or Declared Mobile Data: Trust, But Verify

SHARE:

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Taylor West, general manager, North America, at Zeotap.

“Trust, but verify” was a phrase made famous by President Ronald Reagan during the Cold War in reference to Soviet disarmament, and it makes sense in many other contexts today, including the collection of user data.

Let’s face it: The quality of mobile data is poor because of the industry’s dependence on incomplete or inaccurate data collection. There are a couple of different methods commonly used today, but there is a clear need for greater verification and auditing in EMEA, APAC and the United States.

Probabilistic or inferred data are essentially assumptions made about users based on online activities and behavior, such as user location history. Although inferred data relies heavily on machine learning, it is still an educated guess or a probable scenario.

Large CPG companies like P&G and Unilever only feel comfortable buying when demographic data, such as combined age and gender, reaches certain thresholds, say 70% on-target reach. While predicting gender is quite simple, predicting age brackets probabilistically is much more difficult.

Self-reported or declared data is gained when individuals fill out personal information, such as on a social media site, which can be slightly more accurate but still relies on the honesty of the user. If you consider the distortions of truth on, say, a dating app like Bumble or Tinder, there’s a lot of room for error. 

Verified mobile data has been checked for inaccuracies by the data owner. Telcos can provide verified socio-economic information because a photo ID is required when customers create mobile accounts, and telco data is also tied to mobile ad IDs.

Historically, these companies have been reluctant to release their data for obvious security and privacy reasons, but more have gotten on board during the past year or so. With almost universal adoption of mobile phones, there is less growth in acquiring new users; therefore, new revenue streams will have to come from monetizing valuable data.

This could be a game-changer for the quality of mobile data around the globe, yet challenges still exist, particularly in the US.

Unique Challenges In The United States

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Unfortunately, first-party telco data in the United States isn’t as clear-cut as in other parts of the world because of the prevalence of family plans, which skew individual user data. For US advertisers, the ideal scenario would be to work with other large companies, such as banks or payroll providers, but many of these companies are also hesitant to monetize it.

For now, US advertisers will need to continue using inferred and declared data, until they can find partners willing to offer verified first-party data.

Industry Rating Standards And Independent Auditor 

Ultimately, there is a clear need for an authoritative entity to set industry standards and act as an auditor – similar to MRC accreditation – by testing and scoring demographic data for greater accuracy. This should take place not only post-campaign but ideally pre-campaign, or advertisers are left guessing what their performance will be until after campaigns have run. Such a move could certainly help bring the US closer to par with EMEA and other global markets, and soon everyone might be speaking the same language.

Partnerships like the one recently announced by the ARF and the Coalition for Innovative Media Measurement that proposes a data labeling program for basic information on when data is collected, how fresh it is, the data source, the collection method and type of modeling used demonstrate that influential industry bodies are wisely searching for smart solutions. Labeling is just a first step, but a very important one.

There are any number of capable industry organizations, or possibly even external firms, that could help everyone navigate the mobile data chaos and act as a quality watchdog. But there needs to be a greater sense of urgency, which should be one of the mobile advertising industry’s top New Year’s resolutions.

Follow Zeotap (@zeotap) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Tagged in:

Must Read

For Super Bowl First-Timers Manscaped And Ro, Performance Means Changing Perception

For Manscaped and Ro, the Big Game is about more than just flash and exposure. It’s about shifting how audiences perceive their brands.

Alphabet Can Outgrow Everything Else, But Can It Outgrow Ads?

Describing Google’s revenue growth has become a problem, it so vastly outpaces the human capacity to understand large numbers and percentage growth rates. The company earned more than $113 billion in Q4 2025, and more than $400 billion in the past year.

BBC Studios Benchmarks Its Podcasts To See How They Really Stack Up

Triton Digital’s new tool lets publishers see how their audience size compares to other podcasts at the show and episode level.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: Traffic Jam

People Inc. Says Who Needs Google?

People Inc. is offsetting a 50% decline in Google search traffic through off-platform growth and its highest digital revenue gains in five quarters.

The MRC Wants Ad Tech To Get Honest About How Auctions Really Work

The MRC’s auction transparency standards aren’t intended to force every programmatic platform to use the same auction playbook – but platforms do have to adopt some controversial OpenRTB specs to get certified.

A TV remote framed by dollar bills and loose change

Resellers Crackdowns Are A Good Thing, Right? Well, Maybe Not For Indie CTV Publishers

SSPs have mostly either applauded or downplayed the recent crackdown on CTV resellers, but smaller publishers see it as another revenue squeeze.