Are Black Voices Disappearing From LinkedIn?

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Belinda Smith, marketing and diversity activist.

My personal experience with LinkedIn changed overnight on May 26. The murder of George Floyd was the first time I remember seeing a flood of Black Lives Matter content in my feed. People finally stopped posting about their work-from-home outfits, new standing desks and banana bread, and they were using their platforms on LinkedIn to decry anti-Black racism.

For a while this content was all I saw. First, second, third connections posting protest photos, videos of their own experiences with racism, charities and bail funds, and on and on. As a Black woman who has been in advertising her entire career I was so happy to see people finally speaking up and to be able to read the things that we previously only talked about when we got together for dinner, or went to that Black networking event or called each other in tears to talk about what was going on at the office.

Seeing these stories front and center was amazing. I felt validated that so many people shared my experiences. We were finally acknowledging that racism is, in fact, a professional concern and we were normalizing conversations about creating anti-racist work cultures and policies. I started writing again, posting my content on LinkedIn along with all my interviews, articles and essays.

And people who never engaged with me before took time to like, share, comment and personally thank me for my voice. It started to feel like a turning point, and I was proud of the new voices and hopeful to see companies committing to action, because they could then be held publicly accountable.

But a few weeks ago, one of the many people I follow who posts regularly on issues of diversity, inclusion and systemic racism wrote a detailed article about how, over the past few months since George Floyd’s death, this person observed stifled reach, and thus engagement, for Black professionals who post frequently about these topics.

The author – who I won’t name here – also gave a few examples of people having their accounts banned for sharing “objectionable” content about police violence in the United States. The post then showed disturbing screenshots of threats of death, rape, doxing and racial and sexist slurs displayed publicly as comments to anti-racism content. At the time the article was posted, those profiles were still active.

Seeing this article offered more context to my own recent LinkedIn experiences. Just like anti-Black racism in the office, I didn’t realize how widespread the issue was until I read other accounts.

I had experienced my “views of your post in the feed” numbers continue to dwindle, even as my likes, comments and shares increased. In some cases, I reached out to friends who said they had not seen content from me and sent me screenshots showing my recent activity, which did not include recent posts. I also saw a drastic drop of content in my feed about Black Lives Matter, diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI), and anti-racism in general. When I navigate to my first connections I can see their numerous posts from their profiles, but for some reason they’re no longer in my feed. Of course, all of these things together made me uncomfortably suspicious.

I recently did a fun test. I searched for “Black Lives Matter” on LinkedIn’s homepage and then clicked “content.” The first post led with “Black lives do not matter to Black Lives Matter and ANTIFA.” The next was from “The Nashville Tea Party” about gun violence in Chicago, with the post starting off with, “Where are all the ‘leaders’ and athletes and celebrities???”

Four out of the top 10 posts were from someone whose profile headline reads #AllLivesMatter, and I had to get all the way down to the eighth post for content from anyone I’m connected to. While all of this is personally unsettling to me, the larger question is this: What does it mean when an important conversation crashes into a black-box business model?

You don’t have to agree with my views or my preference for content to wonder how LinkedIn actually works. Has my reach, and the reach of others, been manipulated? Are we being throttled? Why are the accounts of those who have publicly posted death threats still active? What violations did the accounts of Black DEI professionals who were banned commit? How does the search recommendation engine work? Why am I not seeing my first connections’ posts in my feed anymore?

It seems a bit strange that we’ve been asking these questions and demanding answers from every social platform except LinkedIn. Brands and companies recruiting and advertising on LinkedIn account for more than $4 billion in revenue. Shouldn’t we hold it accountable like everyone else? Aren’t we owed some transparency?

LinkedIn has publicly stated it is “committed to building a safe, trusted and professional environment” and it “continually work[s] to improve the safety and security of your experience on our platform.” LinkedIn’s CEO, Ryan Roslansky, has stated that he is “committed to building LinkedIn as an anti-racist platform.” If all of that is true, I definitely have some questions for him.

Please step into the social media truth and accountability ring, LinkedIn. It’s time we heard from you.

Follow Belinda Smith (@bjstech) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Read LinkedIn’s response here.

Enjoying this content?

Sign up to be an AdExchanger Member today and get unlimited access to articles like this, plus proprietary data and research, conference discounts, on-demand access to event content, and more!

Join Today!


  1. Anthony Loredo

    Thank you for addressing this. I see similar things happening on my feed. And searching for the term Black Lives Matter shows some hateful and anti-BLM content the majority of the time (whether you set it to ‘relevant’ or ‘latest’). It’s as if the LinkedIn algorithm is set to amplify hate or amplify anti-BLM voices.

  2. Jack Johnson

    BLM is a political movement seeking to overthrow Western democratic values, including Freedom of Speech. So far, I’d say you’re doing quite a good job, but yes there is more work left to silence those with a different point of view.

    PS – please don’t use racist terms like ‘black-box’ – it is hurtful

  3. What’s wrong with you? You have no idea what BLM stands for. Piss off, “Jack Johnson”.

  4. I am one of the people who’s account was disabled because I shared screen shots of racists messages that were left in my inbox by the owner of a multi-million dollar employment agency out of Ohio. LinkedIn stated that I had violated the community rules by sharing the screen shots and MY behavior was seen as bullying, not the person who left the comments in my inbox. No one from LinkedIn responded to me until I started calling them out on Twitter (crazy, I know). I literally dragged LinkedIn for 2 days on Twitter before their DEI person (a Black woman) reached out to only push me off on the help desk that had disabled my account to begin with. She gave me some spill about LinkedIn didn’t tolerate racism, but their actions told me otherwise. Other social media platforms were held accountable, LinkedIn wasn’t. When my account was finally reactivated my engagement went from thousands (Over 60K people follow me) to barely 10 people. I literally had to stop mentioning key words like Black, diversity, racism, etc. My engagement still isn’t what it used to be and followers constantly reach out and ask if I’m okay because they aren’t seeing my content. In the larger picture we have to look at who runs LinkedIn’s support teams and designs their algorithms, they are mainly workers from India who stated in a LinkedIn Townhall meeting (via chat) a lot of negative things about Blacks and the BLM movement in America. LinkedIn said they couldn’t figure out who the individuals were. Really? An entire tech company and you can’t identify who left racist comments during a company meeting? That is the beast of LinkedIn. I am working on my exit strategy from the platform as I type this. Great article!