Home Daily News Roundup X Marks The Spot; Is It A Black Box Or Slippery Slope?

X Marks The Spot; Is It A Black Box Or Slippery Slope?

SHARE:
Comic: Black Boxes

Warning Track

A location-tracking tool commonly licensed to law enforcement allows users to track devices that visit sensitive locations, Notus reports.

Atlas Privacy, a startup that helps consumers remove their data from data broker sites, recently analyzed a location-tracking tool called Locate X developed by data broker Babel Street. Locate X allows users to search for mobile devices that have visited specific locations – including abortion clinics, courthouses, schools and homes.

Using Locate X, Atlas researchers tracked more than 700 individual devices that had visited an abortion clinic in Florida, as well as the likely home addresses of the device owners. In some cases, they observed how these devices traveled to the clinic over state lines.

Law enforcement having access to a service like this raises civil rights concerns in post-Dobbs America.

Although Babel claims to anonymize this data, Atlas found that it could easily be tied to individuals using commonly available people-finding and address-lookup tools. Atlas also found that the data was being sold in a largely unregulated market, with little oversight over who had access.

Heads-up to the FTC, which has been cracking down on the resale of location data.

And user consent may not be a shield in this case. Notus contacted multiple people whose devices had been tracked by Atlas via Locate X, and many felt they’d never consented to this degree of tracking.

Ghosts In The Machine Learning

The black boxes are getting a little more transparent – but the slippery slopes are also getting more slippery.

Which is a poetic way to say Google and Meta just updated their AI-controlled ad products, adding important campaign controls at the ad level, negative search keyword suppression and new AI-generated creative production.

Google already rolled out its changes systemwide for Performance Max, including a way to automatically flip and crop video ads for any YouTube format. 

Meta, meanwhile, quietly slipped by an “automatic adjustments” update that affords it wider license over advertiser accounts, including the ability to scale budgets or consolidate accounts [H/t @RokHladnik].

But what are framed as handy advertiser tools are actually – of course – all about monetizing the platforms.

It’s all too easy for advertisers to slip into PMax or Advantage+ Shopping Campaigns. Opting in is often positioned within the UI as an innocuous “best practice” or new optimization tool promising a performance lift.

Advertisers may have no idea they’ve agreed to a dramatic overhaul to how their marketing works, and are now automatically signed up for other changes they wouldn’t approve if they’d had a more transparently presented choice.

Vote With Your Dollars

If you’ve ever given a political group your phone number or email address, you’ve probably received some truly wild messages in return – the kind that urge YOU to give MORE before it’s TOO LATE to save AMERICA.

Most of us probably ignore those messages. But you know who doesn’t? People with dementia.

According to an interactive report from CNN, deceptive political fundraisers have extracted millions from unsuspecting elderly Americans, many of whom get tangled up in difficult-to-cancel recurring donations through ActBlue or WinRed.

Some donors in cognitive decline even walk away thinking they’ve been in direct contact with the politicians themselves, confused by messages written in a phony first-person POV. 

These predatory tactics became a source of contention during the 2020 election, but in the years since they’ve gotten considerably worse, particularly on the Republican side.

The FTC has condemned certain practices that contribute to this phenomenon, but it doesn’t appear to have jurisdiction over ads used by political campaigns. 

Which means it’s up to lawmakers or individual attorneys general – whose own careers are directly impacted by political fundraising efforts! – to crack down instead. Great system we’ve got here, huh? 

But Wait, There’s More!

WPP returned to growth in Q3 after several down quarters. [WSJ]

Tensions rise as the World Federation of Advertisers grapples with Musk’s GARM lawsuit, splitting members. [Digiday]

Fox majorly restructures its ad sales team. [Adweek] 

An AI researcher who left OpenAI in August says the company violated copyright law in training ChatGPT. [NYT]

You’re Hired

BlueConic hires Geana Barbosa as CRO. [release

Vistar adds Sean Cheyney as its first-ever head of retail media. [release]

Tagged in:

Must Read

AdExchanger Senior Editors Anthony Vargas and Alyssa Boyle.

POSSIBLE 2026: AdExchanger's Hot Takes

AdExchanger Senior Editors Alyssa Boyle and Anthony Vargas share their takeaways from three days chatting about agentic AI at POSSIBLE.

Reddit Reports A 75% Boost In Q1 Ad Revenue As It Reaches For 100 Million Daily US Users

Generative AI search has pushed traffic off a cliff across most of the internet, but not on social platforms. Reddit included.

POSSIBLE 2026: Can AI Help Agencies Finally Break Down Those Silos?

Domenic Venuto, indie agency Horizon Media’s chief product and data officer, sat down with AdExchanger during POSSIBLE at the Fontainebleau in Miami to unpack the role of AI in today’s media and advertising landscape.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Google Touts Its AI Ad Tech Adoption And New AI Max Features

Google announced new features and ad types for AI Max, its AI-based bidding product for search and shopping or sponsored product ads. The company also touted “hundreds of thousands” of advertisers using AI Max.

Hand pressing blue AI button on keyboard. Digital collage of artificial intelligence interface.

Meta’s Ad Machine Is Purring, So Why Did Its Stock Drop?

Meta’s Q1 call sounded like an AI and hardware pitch, but under the hood it was still about one thing: investing in AI to squeeze more money out of its ads business.

Alphabet Exceeds $100 Billion In Q1 And Its Profits Almost Doubled

Alphabet earned $109.9 billion in Q1 this year, up from $90.2 billion a year ago. And that’s not even the truly gobsmacking number.