Home Content Studio App Targeting Isn’t Good Enough For Modern CTV Buying

App Targeting Isn’t Good Enough For Modern CTV Buying

SHARE:

Alex Chatfield, VP, Marketplace Development, Xandr 

Once upon a time, desktop display advertising was the central way for brands to reach digital audiences. It was a simple process: “I want to appear in The New York Times. I will target nytimes.com. My ad is live on nytimes.com.” While desktop display still plays a prominent role in digital campaigns today, the video and CTV space is growing as brands’ strategic buying format of choice.

In 2020, US CTV spending was up more than 40% with no signs of slowing soon, making it a competitive area with potential for savvy buyers. Unfortunately, the premium video marketplace is more complicated than yesteryear’s desktop display world and requires new tools. The rapid shift to premium video has resulted in an education gap with many desktop display buyers on a steep learning curve and applying legacy techniques to this new channel.

App lists and site lists are blunt instruments in a nuanced market

Premium video content is largely consumed today via applications, downloaded either on a consumer’s CTV or mobile device. Unlike the web, where a site has a single address that you can target, applications have a unique address, or app bundle ID, for each app store that a consumer might use to download it. For buyers, this represents a challenge, as they have to gather and maintain a list of every app bundle ID in order to fully target a single app like Discovery GO.

While app targeting can be useful when targeting an app like Discovery GO, its capabilities fall meaningfully short when trying to target Discovery ad inventory holistically. Woefully for those targeting bundle IDs, a large percentage of content is accessed via distributors – virtual multichannel video programming distributors (vMVPDs) like Hulu, Sling TV and AT&T TV, and free ad-supported TV (FAST) applications like Pluto TV, WatchFree and TV PLUS – where the application often represents hundreds of different channels and a variety of content. If your only targeting tool is application targeting, you have no way to reach a consumer who is streaming Discovery on Sling TV without also including every other channel/show on that application.

Another hurdle in this new and fragmented space is reporting. DSPs today don’t tell buyers that app bundle ID “B00BI60DMU” (which represents the TBS app on Amazon Fire) and app bundle ID “9pjmtvpcn31k” (the TNT app on Xbox), for example, are both owned by WarnerMedia. It only tells them how much they spent on those app bundle IDs. In a premium video marketplace that’s populated by large media conglomerates like Disney, WarnerMedia and A+E Networks, this reporting gap limits a buyer’s ability to negotiate and track spend against commitments.

Filter to eliminate duplication and find more of the right consumers

So what does all this mean? Buyers should focus on reaching premium video audiences through platforms that invest in video content metadata and offer a standardized deal taxonomy – like Xandr’s Premium Video Catalog – rather than through app bundle ID targeting. To successfully reach full audiences across video/CTV inventory, buyers need to use deals, which provide more granular and targeted access to specific content across every consumer access point.

As buyers continue their quest to reach specific, interested audiences wherever they’re watching, they should prioritize scaled solutions that enable distinct deal filters across a number of categories, like parent media company. Such solutions will be key for solving broad challenges like cross-screen, deduplicated reach as well as more nuanced matters like reporting and negotiation.

Must Read

Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

2025: The Year Google Lost In Court And Won Anyway

From afar, it looks like Google had a rough year in antitrust court. But zoom in a bit and it becomes clear that the past year went about as well as Google could have hoped for.

Why 2025 Marked The End Of The Data Clean Room Era

A few years ago, “data clean rooms” were all the ad tech trades could talk about. Fast-forward to 2026, and maybe advertisers don’t need to know what a data clean room is after all.

The AI Search Reckoning Is Dismantling Open Web Traffic – And Publishers May Never Recover

Publishers have been losing 20%, 30% and in some cases even as much as 90% of their traffic and revenue over the past year due to the rise of zero-click AI search.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

No Waiting for May – CES Is Where The TV Upfront Season Starts 

If any single event can be considered the jumping-off point for TV upfronts, it’s the Consumer Electronics Showcase (CES), which kicks off this week in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Comic: This Is Our Year

Comic: This Is Our Year

It’s been 15 years since this comic first ran in January 2011, and there’s something both quaint and timeless about it. Here’s to more (and more) transparency in 2026, and happy New Year!

From AI To SPO: The Top 10 AdExchanger Guest Columns Of 2025

The generative AI trend generated endless hot takes this year, but the ad industry also had plenty to say about growing competition between DSPs and SSPs. Here are AdExchanger’s top 10 most popular guest columns of 2025 and why they resonated.