Home Commerce Retail Media Cannot Be Standardized – Yet ‘Standards’ Are Coming

Retail Media Cannot Be Standardized – Yet ‘Standards’ Are Coming

SHARE:

Hey, readers!

Thanks for reading AdExchanger’s Commerce Media newsletter. I’m Senior Editor James Hercher, and this week I’m diving into the push for retail media standards.

Some form of retail media standardization seems inevitable at this point.

Retailers want it, marketers need it, agencies are dying without it, and programmatic tech companies will happily pull the weight of product development.

But it remains to be seen whether all that pent-up energy can accomplish the impossible – the creation of standards for campaigns that defy the notion of standardization.

Standardizing the unstandard

Earlier this week, the IAB and MRC released a much-awaited retail media standards proposal, which is open for public comment until October 13. Although industry working group proposals often deal in platitudes, the IAB, to its credit, tackles the complexity head-on.

For example, the IAB is proposing taxonomies for different kinds of stores (grocery, home improvement, convenience, department store, etc.) and “sub-polygons” or zones within stores that might be targeted differently, such as a deli, a pickup area for online purchases, a garden center or a section containing coolers.

Retailers gauge viewability metrics and impressions based on foot traffic in a given zone during a set period of time for the potential viewers of an ad, which can be drawn from location vendors that track foot traffic or from sensors in the store.

But there are so many ways that retailers can reach someone in and around a store, all of which might be bundled into a retail media “digital place-based” campaign (or DPB, because, after all, there are more than 17,000 possible three-letter acronyms in the English language, and ad tech never met a TLA it didn’t love).

Some stores have dynamic ads that appear on digital screens overlaid onto coolers or, say, a Coinstar machine.

Coinstar, which has a retail media biz itself, of course, might own a portion of the DPB ad inventory that serves to that machine, while retailers can claim a portion of the ad supply in their store. Retailers sign similar deals with companies like Volta, an electric vehicle charging station manufacturer, which has a retail media business, too, and offers retailers a cut of inventory to build stations in their parking lots.

Some of those ads might be video, some display or even text. In fact, sometimes it’s just sound, since retailers control radio and in-store music and sell those ad units as DPB media.

Chains like Albertsons and Best Buy are piloting ways to target an individual with a personalized deal offer displayed on a smart cart or in-store screen. Is that the same as a Coinstar ad claiming viewability from every passerby?

The answer depends on the particulars of every different retailer.

Some chains tie groceries, gas and other sales together into a single loyalty program, which means people are there to buy gas and shop. Sometimes there’s a gas station within the geofenced vicinity of a grocery or convenience store, and that station could do retail media extensions with CPG video ads on its gas pumps.

Although the value proposition of these placements is very different, it’s very hard for an advertiser to tell the difference from a measurement perspective.

Who sets the bar?

There’s a parallel standardization dilemma happening in CTV Land.

Broadcasters, streaming services, YouTube and measurement arbiters like Nielsen simply can’t bridge the gaps between their media. Broadcasters say their professionally produced, 30-second commercials shouldn’t be counted the same way a skippable, six-second YouTube spot is counted. YouTube argues its ads are targeted, engaging and people actually watch them.

The big retailers will need to push for advertiser education and set a higher bar for measurement. Otherwise, their own inventory and data, which they consider so valuable, will fall into the same bucket as all sorts of shoddy placements.

Advertisers should question the ROAS of retail media, said Claire Wyatt, VP of business strategy and marketing science for the Albertsons Media Collective, speaking at the IAB Connected Commerce Summit in NYC on Wednesday.

For instance, some brands see up-and-down swings for their business in a grocery chain, while the retailer’s media network touts consistent $50 returns on ad spend or even higher.

“That’s a lie!” Wyatt said. “And I’m glad if standards will bring rigor.”

Must Read

multiple sets of eyes

Amazon DSP Adds Adelaide’s Pre-Bid Attention Targeting

Advertisers can target high- and medium-attention ad inventory in Amazon DSP while filtering out low-attention placements and made-for-advertising sites.

Marketers Are Getting Used To AI In The Ad Stack

Marketers and media buyers are gradually getting more comfortable talking about ad campaigns they’re testing on large-language models like OpenAI’s ChatGPT.

For Video Publishers, Performance And AI Go Hand In Hand

In Connected TV Ad Land, proving performance is the priority for video advertisers. To drive more demonstrable reach and results, publishers are trying to expand their reach while wringing more data and AI features into their offerings. 

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Independent Ad Tech Is Reframing Itself Around Cloud Hardware

Nowadays, programmatic vendors, and SSPs in particular, are carving new paths of differentiation based on their type of adoption of cloud infrastructure.

Ad Performance Hinges On Kicking Fragmentation’s Butt

As performance takes center-stage in more advertising discussions, demands to solve fragmentation and cruddy measurement are reaching a fever pitch.

AdExchanger's Big Story podcast with journalistic insights on advertising, marketing and ad tech

AI Off The Rails

A word of caution to digital advertising companies, as they go all in on AI algorithms: They need to build these solutions with ownership, governance and accountability from the start – or AI could sink them with a single mistake.