Home Agencies The Data Flow Is Like A Broken Water Main

The Data Flow Is Like A Broken Water Main

SHARE:

“the executioner” opinion expressed below is written by Sam Temes, Associate, Platform Management, Ad Exchanges, at Razorfish.

The ExecutionerThe CEO of a major ad exchange recently likened the flow of data from real-time ad exchanges to a fire hose – I like to think of it as more of a broken water main. There is so much information coming out and so quickly that it’s impossible for most to do anything reasonable with it. Just participating in real-time bidding requires the processing of thousands of transactions per second, reliable data centers that can pass information instantaneously, and continuous up-time. As an agency buying on behalf of my advertisers, it is technology I know little about, but I know that my clients can benefit from the kinds of insights that result from it.

As more exchanges introduce real-time bidding in 2010 and ad networks, ad exchanges and data providers enter the platform space, there will be a rush to see who can deliver the best performance and the smoothest UI. But for a platform to truly meet an advertiser’s needs (and help grow the industry), it needs to have expert plumbing that both supports scale and speed, and also allows buyers to generate insights from the data that are both predictive and significant (not to mention interesting).

Having the best algorithm won’t be enough for the savviest agencies. We, on behalf of our advertisers, are already expecting to learn what makes exchange buys perform and what we can learn from performance to help advertisers’ broader marketing. The key to a best-in-class platform will be having an expert decisioning tool and the technology and analysis to make sense of the decisions for humans. As more players enter the demand side platform space, the competition for the best decisioning algorithm is sure to heat up. But in order for exchange based media buying to keep growing, we need the tools to prove to advertisers that we can make use of the information inside the box.

Follow Sam Temes (@SamTemes), Razorfish (@Razorfish) and AdExchanger.com (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Northbeam Adds The Third Leg Of The Attribution Stool With Incrementality Testing

There’s MMM and MTA, but no single ad measurement works for brands with multiple points of sale. On Tuesday, Northbeam launched an incrementality tool to complete what it calls “the trifecta of digital attribution.”

Comic: The Great Online Privacy Battle

What Regulators Talk About When They Talk About Ad Tech

If you want to know what privacy regulators think about online advertising, it’s not a mystery. Just listen to what they’re saying.

Keyword Blocking Demonetized More Than Half Of Reuters’ Brand-Safe Stories

The effect wasn’t just limited to news content. The Reuters.com/lifestyle vertical also had some of its brand-suitable pages blocked.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

The Agentic Marketplace Is Here. Where Does That Leave DSPs and SSPs?

Swivel and Olyzon’s new partnership brings buy-side and sell-side agents together as early examples of an agentic marketplace.

Comic: Causal Meets Casual

Jones Road Beauty Is Using A New Type Of MMM To Reset Its Media Measurement

Inside how Jones Road Beauty is trying to turn messy, conflicting measurement signals into a single testing roadmap for its media mix.

Comic: America's Mext Top AI Model

AI Is Moving Fast. The Law, Not So Much

IAPP’s Global Summit in DC was a reminder that AI is moving fast – and judges, privacy lawyers and practitioner are racing to keep up.