Home Agencies Can Indie Agency Jellyfish Expand Into A Global Network?

Can Indie Agency Jellyfish Expand Into A Global Network?

SHARE:

When the boutique programmatic agency Jellyfish sold a majority $550 million stake last November to French holding company Fimalac, it did so to transform from an agency into a global network.

Jellyfish started as a Google Marketing Platform (GMP) reseller and programmatic in-houser. It will make this transition by acquiring specialist companies that can enhance its capabilities and footprint in regions where it doesn’t have a presence.

Jellyfish wants to compete with the big six holding companies for global accounts. But rather than going to market with multiple brands, it will operate as a single P&L under the Jellyfish brand, similar to how Accenture Interactive goes to market.

That consistency and reporting structure will give Jellyfish a leg up in rolling out a cohesive global offering, said Jellyfish CEO Rob Pierre.

“Anybody can take multiple agencies and put an umbrella brand over it and say, ‘We’ve got global coverage,’” Pierre said. “But you’re not really delivering a global solution.”

Jellyfish, which has offices in 13 countries, across the United States, Europe and Asia, has already absorbed French programmatic agency Tradelab as part of the Fimalac investment. The agency has its eye on three or four more acquisitions that will either bring in new skill sets or expand its current solutions in new markets.

Pierre spoke with AdExchanger.

AdExchanger: You say Jellyfish is better positioned than its competitors to roll out a global network. How?

ROB PIERRE: We’re not a network of multiple agencies working together. We are one brand with one proposition. We built Jellyfish from the ground up. If we acquire a business, they are fully integrated into our infrastructure.

We have heads of each capability. Their job is to ensure wherever you are, you’re using the same methodology and technology stack. If [a client’s] headquarters is in one region, we’re making sure we’ve got all of the requisite skills, products and training in that region. But if they want to export that globally, they will get the same service across the globe, and we’ll keep a centralized handle on what’s going on.

What kind of companies are you looking to acquire?

We’re looking for companies that are digital first, maybe have some technology, but more importantly, have capabilities we can integrate into what we’re doing. And, of course, if they’re in regions where we don’t have a presence.

[We’re looking for] manageable acquisitions we can integrate. [For example], we’re building out our Salesforce and CRM practice. We now have the working capital to exploit the foundations we’ve already built.

What capabilities did you gain with Tradelab?

Tradelab has programmatic and data capabilities, a reporting platform, analytics and tagging technology. They have technology that sits on top of GMP, which allows us to do more in a quicker, automated way. Jellyfish did create some tools and systems that helped us automate, but we didn’t have engineers [focused on] creating technology.

What technology do you need to build?

If we manually do anything more than three times, we want to either use technology or refine the process to make that more efficient. Setting up individual IOs in GMP could take up to 20 minutes. You have to do that quite often. So we built technology that will do it in under 60 seconds.

We’re not trying to replace the DSPs or analytics platforms. We’re building things on top that help us do things in an efficient way. We’ll go after the [products] first where we can have immediate impact. That will also help [guide] where we continue to put investment.

How is the deprecation of the cookie going to impact the work you do for clients?

It will change [how we work], because you are marketing in a different way. As the publisher and content becomes more relevant again, it’s less related to targeting the person, because you can’t get that data. We will go back to using clever ways to do contextual advertising.

I think a lot of emphasis is not going to be on the buying, but how we deliver the message with dynamic creative and the way we use different formats.

This interview has been edited and condensed.

Tagged in:

Must Read

Why Wall Street Turned Against The Trade Desk

The Trade Desk is less than a third as valuable as it was a year ago. It retains about one-tenth of its high-water market cap from December 2024, when the company was worth almost $70 billion. Why did investors lose the faith?

Garrett McGrath, President, Prebid.org

Prebid’s New President Is Its Former Chairman, Garrett McGrath

McGrath left Prebid in June following five years as board chairman after stepping down as SVP of product management at Magnite. But now, overseeing Prebid will be his full-time job.

TV Manufacturer Telly Touts Programmatic Home Screen Ads

Telly, the startup that gives away free smart TVs in exchange for data and ad exposure, is making its home screen ads available for brands to buy programmatically – and pushing for industry standards to help attract more spend. 

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

AI Is Helping L’Oréal Brainstorm Unique Ways To Reach Male Audiences

L’Oréal adopted creative AI platform Springboards to generate creative ideas that led to a collaborative, ongoing ideation process.

AdExchanger's Big Story podcast with journalistic insights on advertising, marketing and ad tech

Google Had Its Day In Court. Now, It’s Amazon’s Turn

Google won’t have to break up its ads business after being declared an online monopolist. Meanwhile, Amazon faces a lawsuit from the FTC alleging that it charged advertisers more than necessary for ecommerce ads.

The FTC’s Amazon Lawsuit Is Ad Tech’s History Of Opacity Repeating Itself

Buy-side experts said it’s another example of a Big Tech platform taking advantage of the lack of transparency built into programmatic ad auctions. And they’re not optimistic change is coming.