Home Ad Exchange News Verizon-Yahoo Lives! Here’s Why The Deal’s Architects Remain Enthused

Verizon-Yahoo Lives! Here’s Why The Deal’s Architects Remain Enthused

SHARE:

vzThe Verizon-Yahoo marriage is still on and will close “as soon as practicable” in Q2, the companies announced Tuesday.

The companies have jointly amended the terms of their purchase agreement by $350 million, shaving 7% off Yahoo’s original sticker price of $4.8 billion.

The agreement puts an end to a monthslong game of “Will they, won’t they?” in the tech press following the revelations of Yahoo security breaches that affected upward of 1 billion users.

The settlement is great news for Yahoo, said Elgin Thompson, managing director of Digital Capital Advisors.

“Relative to the $1 billion discount discussed last October after news of the data breaches, it appears the $350 million reduction is a win for Yahoo,” Thompson said. “There is risk mitigation and then there is recutting the deal. $350 million, if that is the settlement, seems reasonable.”

Verizon and AOL executives remain enthused about the value of Yahoo’s assets, including its 600 million mobile monthly active users across scaled properties like Yahoo Finance, Yahoo Sports and Yahoo Mail.

Mail alone has 225 million logged-in users, lending valuable scale to AOL’s ad platform business.

“Verizon’s subscriber data coupled with Yahoo content and email addresses enables more precise ad targeting,” Thompson said. “This linkage is critical in light of the digital oligopoly/walled gardens of Facebook and Google controlling 80% of ad budgets. Verizon/AOL/Yahoo would still be probabilistic, but would move closer to deterministic.” 

Then there’s Yahoo’s ad tech business – namely Flurry and BrightRoll.

Observers say BrightRoll could serve as the basis for a combined ad stack, since it has both a video DSP and exchange, and AdExchanger sources have described AOL’s video platform Adap.tv as in dire need of an upgrade.

In addition to a price reduction, Verizon and Yahoo will now share “certain legal and regulatory liabilities arising from the data breaches,” according to the companies.

Upon the deal’s closure, Yahoo is responsible for paying 50% of any cash liabilities incurred from non-Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) government investigations or third-party litigation related to the breaches.

Any liabilities arising from shareholder lawsuits and SEC investigations will continue to be Yahoo’s responsibility.

Tagged in:

Must Read

Shopify Wades Deeper Into Advertising, But Not Ad Tech

Shopify is slowly but surely making its way into the ads business. But the ecommerce leader maintains its laissez-faire approach to ad monetization.

Walmart Buys Vibe.co To Woo SMBs To Streaming

Walmart will buy Vibe.co, a self-serve video ad platform, in hopes of attracting more small and medium-sized advertisers to connected TV.

OpenAI's debut in Cannes

At Its First-Ever Cannes, OpenAI Says ‘We Are Clearly In The Advertising Business Now’

Bonjour, ChatGPT ads. OpenAI’s inaugural Cannes Lions appearance doubled as a coming‑out party for its baby ad business.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Friends high-five while watching a football soccer match

Fire TV Makes A Play For Its Share Of Home Screen Ad Dollars

Amazon is making a splash at Cannes by touting recent Fire TV interface upgrades designed to help viewers find relevant content more easily, including when they are watching the 2026 FIFA World Cup.

Comic: Overfrequency

Omnicom Can Now Measure Ad Frequency Across Multiple CTV Platforms

For the first time, Omnicom can directly compare ad frequency and performance across multiple major streamers, which typically prefer to keep data locked inside their walled gardens.

Inside The Trade Desk’s Pitch For Ventura TV OS

The Trade Desk is muscling its way into the TV operating system business with its Ventura OS – but the real story isn’t the product itself. It’s what TTD’s ambitions reveal about conflicts of interest within the industry and the inherent mismatch between consumer and advertiser needs.