Home Ad Exchange News The Wedge Widens Between Advertisers And Twitter; Snap Gets Dinged On Privacy In Illinois

The Wedge Widens Between Advertisers And Twitter; Snap Gets Dinged On Privacy In Illinois

SHARE:

Here’s today’s AdExchanger.com news round-up… Want it by email? Sign up here.

Twitter Gets Bitter

Just when Twitter thought Elon Musk was done scaring ad dollars away from the platform, a whistleblower jumped in with security breach accusations.

As if advertisers aren’t already giving Twitter a wide enough berth.  

The whistleblower is Peiter Zatko, Twitter’s own ex-chief security officer. Twitter fired Zatko in January, and now he’s accusing Twitter of intentionally undercounting spam bots on its platform and violating its privacy agreements with the FTC, which include limiting the number of employees that have access to central Twitter privacy controls, WSJ reports.

This accusation is going to make ad buyers even more hesitant to spend on Twitter, one agency exec tells Digiday.

Twitter, meanwhile, already reported a 1% year-over-year revenue decrease last quarter, which it mostly blamed on uncertainty around Musk’s acquisition plans. Even so, Twitter is doing its best to prioritize its advertising business, which increased 2% year-over-year.

Meaning Twitter has a lot to lose if advertisers continue to flee.

But it’s possible that Twitter was already losing their attention even before Musk came into the picture. Marketers tell Digiday that Twitter represents a small proportion of their performance marketing budgets. (Guess they’re spending it on TikTok instead.)

Oh, Snap

Speaking of platforms and privacy, well, so are lawyers.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Advocates are especially vocal lately about health-related privacy protections, and the latest offender is Snapchat.

Its parent company Snap just settled a class-action lawsuit for $35 million, USA Today reports. Snap supposedly collected biometric data from Snapchat’s camera lens filters without user consent, violating the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). The $35 million is to be paid out to Illinois residents whose data was allegedly collected through the filters.

Unsurprisingly, Snap denied that any biometric data collected by the platform could be used to identify a specific individual, a company spokesperson told TechCrunch.

Not that Snap is the only platform accused of being negligent with personal information lately. Meta is paying $650 million to settle its own violation of BIPA last year and, not to be left out, Google and TikTok both also settled suits in Illinois earlier this year over facial recognition features.

Illinois isn’t joking around.

Ecommerce Takes A Dip

Ecommerce is slowing down around the world – and that’s going to have implications for advertisers.

Lower ecommerce revenue means less ad spending on digital platforms, according to GroupM.

Although it’s hardly fair to compare this most recent Q2 to the second quarter of last year, when ecommerce sales were still surging amid the pandemic, according to MediaPost.

But, as brick-and-mortar retail rebounds amid a prolonged return to post-pandemic normalcy, ecommerce has suffered.

“In many countries, ecommerce is growing slower than retail right now,” said Brian Wieser, GroupM’s global president of business intelligence.

Getting a handle on the ecommerce market is tricky, though, because different countries define ecommerce differently. And, as consumer behavior changes and practices like “buy online, pick up in store” – good old BOPIS – remain popular, it can be hard to distinguish between an ecommerce-based transaction and a purely in-person transaction.

But many consider retail numbers to be a proxy for predicting consumer behavior, Wieser said. And as ecommerce revenues come back down to earth from pandemic highs, it could cause a pullback in ecommerce ad spending.

But Wait, There’s More!

In the first settlement under CCPA, Sephora will pay $1.2 million for sharing user data with a third-party tracking company without consent. [NBC News]

Why brands keep trying to make “zero-party data” happen. [Ad Age]

Instagram Reels drive high engagement, but it’s not where the influencers are. [Insider]

Differential pricing could be a viable method for subscription streaming services looking to boost average revenue per user. [Mobile Dev Memo]

How Equifax gathers income data through partnerships with employers – and how that data is used. [Sanford School of Public Policy]

Gaming-focused ad network Thece is looking to create an alternative pathway for esports companies to generate revenue from their livestreamed content. [Digiday]

Commerce-based startup Lily AI raises $25 million. [TechCrunch]

You’re Hired!

C-suite moves: Comscore names new CIO, COO and CTO (and announces the exit of its CCO). [TV News Check]

Pinterest hires former Meta senior marketing director Stacy Malone as its VP of global business marketing. [Adweek]

Must Read

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.