Home Ad Exchange News Account Sharing Ain’t Just A Netflix Thing; Will Congress Pass A Real Ad Tech Tax?

Account Sharing Ain’t Just A Netflix Thing; Will Congress Pass A Real Ad Tech Tax?

SHARE:

Here’s today’s AdExchanger.com news round-up… Want it by email? Sign up here.

Ye Shall Not Password!

Password sharing isn’t just a Netflix problem.

Streaming platforms have largely held their tongues because account sharing does have its benefits. For example, allowing people to share accounts helps grow a service’s audience base (although some promo subscription prices practically give the farm away).

But it’s costly. Research firm Parks Associates found that US video providers lost $9.1 billion to piracy in 2019 – and a third of that loss came directly from shared or stolen credentials, Marketing Brew reports.

Parks projects this total loss to balloon to $12.5 billion by 2024.

It’s a slippery dance, though. How do you make users pay without driving them away? There are subtle, middle paths to explore before jumping straight to “Eff you, pay me,” which looks like it’s going to be Netflix’s approach.

For one, streamers can limit concurrent viewing. Hulu, for instance, limits simultaneous streams to two screens, and HBO Max alerts an account’s credit card holder once a certain number of households are using the same account (aka snitching on kids using their parents’ log-in).

Here’s an important question, though: Will these tactics work? Streamers might lose some viewers as they clamp down on overall account abuses, but they’ll also snag some new subs.

The True Ad Tech Tax

A bipartisan group of senators is set to introduce an advertising antitrust bill that would force Google to divest its ad tech business, among other far-reaching changes.  

Amazon Advertising and the Meta Audience Network (it’s still FAN, too bad, Meta) would be in the same boat, since the bill would restrict companies with more than $20 billion in annual ad revenue from also owning ad exchanges or other tools to buy and sell ads, Bloomberg reports.  

Companies with more than $5 billion in annual ad revenue would be compelled to “act in customers’ best interests” and provide more ad data transparency, such as the terms of winning bids and fees (ahem, the take rates) charged by the platform. 

Details are fuzzy for now, because the news is attributed to two anonymous leakers. The text itself isn’t cited.

Although bipartisan laws are regularly floated or even brought to the floor, they can’t move forward without the necessary votes. 

Still, this is yet another effort to throw open the Overton window on tech regulation and set the stage for a high-stakes lobbying campaign on the road to comprehensive federal legislation.

Take Your Medicine

This doctor doesn’t think cookies are good for your health.

A couple of years ago, an emergency medicine physician who declined third-party cookies was unable to access a needed medical journal because of obscure site cookie rules. It wasn’t an emergency. He reverted to accepting cookies and, presto, he got access. But the experience stuck in the doctor’s craw, and he started a medical and health care data research program across Penn Med and Carnegie Mellon. 

In its first year, the group mapped third-party data collection and tracking across online health sites and medical journals. The next step is to understand how the data could be used to make medical inferences and target ads. 

Can someone’s browsing history suggest a possible diabetes diagnosis, for instance, and if so does that change the ads they see?

“We’ve documented over and over again that most health-related web pages have some tracking,” says Dr. Ari Friedman, who runs the program. “What are the implications of that?”

Good question.

But Wait, There’s More!

Ad tech firms didn’t sound the alarm about false information in Gannett’s ad auctions. [WSJ]

Why in-app personalization, not probabilistic attribution, is the future of post-ATT advertising. [Mobile Dev Memo]

The Out of Home Advertising Association of America launched a new brand “council” to help advance the OOH industry. [release]

Netflix’s subscriber loss woes aren’t over. [Variety]

Toolkits: Discounted subscription trials and promo offers are here to stay. [blog]

Xandr will offer GumGum’s contextual targeting technology. [B+C]

You’re Hired!

Walgreens poaches Calvin Klein’s Linh Peters as its new CMO. [Ad Age]

Must Read

CIMM Is Out To Prove That All Media Isn’t Equal

An upcoming paper from CIMM doesn’t just demonstrate that differences in media quality can be measured. It also argues that tying media value to short-term outcomes has perpetuated longstanding industry challenges.

TikTok On Why Brands Can’t Buy Its New Ad Formats Programmatically

Not unlike last year, the mood during TikTok’s NewFronts presentation last week felt like cautious optimism, if not outright relief.

Meta’s NewFronts Message To Advertisers: Embrace The Noise

Can a good sales presentation offset the impact of a very bad news week? That’s a question for Meta, which collected two guilty verdicts in court this week for failing to protect children and creating additive products.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

AI Helps Manscaped Trim Social Chatter Down To The Bare Essentials

Meet Clamor, a new social listening product that pulls cultural insights from online conversations in real time. Clamor helped Manscaped freshen up its marketing, including for this year’s Super Bowl.

A man talking to a robot

How Red Roof Is Bringing In More Customers With Zeta’s Voice-Activated AI Agent

Hotel chain Red Roof is using Zeta’s new voice-activated AI agent to guide its campaign creation, deployment timing and audience development.

Jean-Paul Schmetz, Chief of Ads, Brave

Why Ad-Blocking Browser Brave Introduced Its Own Ads

Brave’s chief of ads Jean-Paul Schmetz on competition in the search and browser markets, the fallout from the Google Search antitrust ruling and whether AI search will help smaller upstarts compete with Big Tech.