Home The Sell Sider Why Do Publishers Still Have Fragmented Sales Teams?

Why Do Publishers Still Have Fragmented Sales Teams?

SHARE:

“The Sell Sider” is a column written by the sell side of the digital media community.

Today’s column is written by Bruno Rebouças, chief executive officer at ProgMedia.

Today’s media-buying trends show that programmatic deals will keep growing aggressively compared to direct buys. Some key advertisers have already reached a point where all of their display campaigns are bought programmatically, rather than through direct buys.

It can be a tough thing to swallow, as most changes are. In this case, publishers were the most impacted, and many had a hard time adapting. Like most ad tech trends, US players led the charge, while publishers in Latin America, where I am based, followed suit. Today, it seems likely that pretty much any mid-sized publisher has sold at least one programmatic deal, and the ones that haven’t are on their way to doing so.

However, even with this huge shift, there is still one thing that hasn’t fully changed: Many publishers, especially in Latin America, still have their “old” sales team, which is focused on selling directly, and their “new” programmatic team, which is focused on selling programmatic deals. Not surprisingly, it is common to see internal competition for the same client’s budget.

There are some extreme cases where the direct-buy teams may communicate to advertisers and agencies that “programmatic deals don’t work,” which showcases how potentially unhealthy this arrangement can be. There should be no competition around which kind of sale or deal is the best because there is no best way. This begs the question: Is it really necessary to keep two individual sales teams?

Ahead Of The Curve

The most successful publishers already understand that their sales teams need to be more holistic and take a more consultative approach to agencies and advertisers. To achieve this, it is impossible to keep the direct vs. programmatic sales team fragmented. The key is to understand all the different kinds of buying and selling types available, including open auction, private auctions, preferred deals, programmatic guaranteed and direct, in order to suggest the option that makes the most sense for each case.

Some great examples of publishers excelling in programmatic include Business Insider, Meredith and Spotify, which have all taken steps to integrate their sales teams.

In Latin America, UOL, a big Brazilian publisher, has led the charge and trained all of its sales reps, who used to sell only directly, in programmatic deals long ago.

Potential Pitfalls

Consolidating internal teams, however, is never easy. It gets even worse when the changes are made too quickly, which is how the demand for programmatic deals grew.

Challenges of integrating sales teams are many. Conversations are getting more technical, which requires a new skill set from sales reps. Also, it is difficult for publishers to deal with sales teams’ compensation since revenue predictability is considerably lower in programmatic. There is a required mindset change from “selling more” to “selling better.” It shouldn’t be about selling millions of impressions, but about selling great inventory and data so that the CPM prices can increase, too. It is a business structural change.

But the way media is bought has changed dramatically, and publishers’ sales teams should do so too. Buyers do not benefit from having two sales reps from the same publisher telling them that their product is the best.

Instead of focusing their energy on which team is going to sell more of each deal type, why not focus on improvements that buyers really care about? Viewability, content quality, brand safety, fraud and audience data are some examples that, if well managed, should have a positive impact on a publisher’s revenue stream. As buyers get more savvy, they will care more about those variables and less about the kind of deal type they are using.

This holds true even more so in less savvy markets, where this kind of fragmentation holds back programmatic’s evolution. There is a clear opportunity for publishers that take a more holistic and consultative stance. Not all buyers are 100% familiar with all the programmatic deals types and possibilities, which makes the perfect scenario for the advisory approach.

Follow AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Tagged in:

Must Read

Netflix Touts New Measurement Capabilities As It Struggles With “Modest” Engagement Growth

Netflix’s revenue grew 12% YOY to $12.9 billion in Q3, which it maintains is in line with its forecast. Its ads business, however, is lagging slightly compared with expectations, causing Netflix to tweak its forecast for the rest of the year.

Apple Publishes Its Plan To Wipe Out Web Tracking

Apple is coming for identity resolution. WebKit’s latest tracking crackdown targets the infrastructure behind post-cookie IDs – and switching to a first-party setup won’t necessarily spare vendors.

AI Slop Sites Are On The Rise. Is Ad Tech Ready For Its New MFA Challenge?

Advertising supply chain intelligence company DecryptAds uncovered more than 2,100 AI-generated recipe sites that are monetized with programmatic ads and feature fabricated author profiles.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

How Australian Home Lender Lendi Measures The Invisible Work Of AI

Most brands and businesses are trying to figure out how to improve their metrics when it comes to AI – and also what those metrics even are.

AI Startup Minerva Built An Agentic CDP, But Don’t Call It That

Minerva wants to turn fragmented customer data into something marketers can use, with AI agents doing the work behind the scenes.

VideoAmp Bets On AI To Connect Ad Planning And Measurement

VideoAmp is competing in the measurement space by sharpening its focus on TV audience data, ad performance and, of course, AI. The company is also making strategic hires and promoting from within.