Home The Sell Sider Direct Sales And Programmatic: A Happy Medium?

Direct Sales And Programmatic: A Happy Medium?

SHARE:

lornebrownsellsiderThe Sell Sider” is a column written for the sell side of the digital media community.

Today’s column is written by Lorne Brown, CEO at Operative.

There’s a lot of talk that programmatic advertising brings more money and less overhead cost to an organization, leading to publishers rapidly expanding their programmatic channels. By 2016, eMarketer predicts, 63% of digital display will be programmatic, up from 24% in 2014.

“Programmatic” as the term is currently used may refer to anything from exchange-traded inventory to spot TV buys. That said, the rapid growth predicted by eMarketer will come from types of automation to increase the efficiency of sales operations, rather than more publishers dumping remnant inventory in exchanges. A major driver will be programmatic direct, a compromise of sorts between fixed-price direct sales and exchange-traded remnant inventory.

Programmatic direct and other offerings that help direct sales are where publishers can gain the most value. There is a widespread fear and mistrust of “automation” on the sales side, but in reality it’s what enables salespeople to put their best foot forward and spend their time on high-ROI activities.

To keep pace with the future of digital sales, publishers should take a holistic look at their inventory and consider an integrated approach to automating their advertising business. This means ensuring that their direct and programmatic sales not only coexist, but also intertwine.

Standard Programmatic Inventory Shouldn’t Mean ‘Bad Quality’

As brands continue to demand high-impact, unique advertising solutions, “standard” inventory is quickly diminishing in value. Buyers are reluctant to pay high CPMs for leaderboards and skyscrapers when they are so readily available in the marketplace.

While this is the obvious first set of inventory to be pushed to programmatic channels, often through a supply-side platform, it shouldn’t feel like the place remnant inventory goes to die. Publishers should think about offering unique audience targeting opportunities. Some publishers are starting to create their own “audience trading desks” to differentiate from the large data marketplaces, charging more premium prices as a result. Publishers should also take fraud issues seriously. One bad audience extension buy through a programmatic channel could hurt future, more lucrative deals on the direct sales side.

Automation Does Not Mean ‘Replaced By A Robot’

The last thing publishers want is for their best sellers to feel like inventory is being taken away from them or that their jobs are redundant. Advertisers will pay a premium for creativity and contextual relevance, and will always want to experiment with new technologies, channels and targeting options that aren’t available through a programmatic partner.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Programmatic direct technologies, such as AdSlot or ShinyAds, offer publishers a good opportunity to introduce direct sellers to tools that decrease tedious tasks, freeing them up to think about better custom offerings or make new deals. The sellers that embrace this will come out on top.

Waterfall Selling Must Become Data-Driven

The “waterfall” approach is often a bit of a hyperbole. Publishers typically let direct sellers complete sales and divide what’s left across a soup of barely differentiated partnerships. It’s almost impossible to really know who’s delivering the most value across these other channels, and the price gap between direct sales and the rest is severe. Publishers need to do two things to better intertwine their offerings.

First, they need to kill the blind “waterfall” approach to selling and think of direct and programmatic channels as one pool of inventory to be sold at the best price possible, including when its bundled with premium sales. To save time, sellers should be trained on the technologies that drive the best packaged sale for clients.

Next, publishers need to perform some well-orchestrated A/B tests with vendors to find the best mix as part of a strategy that involves shifting to a more agnostic, data-driven approach.

Yield managers or partners can help build, execute and maintain a strategy like this. Since it may require an organizational restructuring and a new approach to direct selling that includes yield management and dynamic inventory packaging, there is a lot to prepare for.

Automated ad sales should be a single piece of a larger, integrated business strategy. The benefits of programmatic will not come from funneling inventory through an open exchange and eliminating talented team members, but rather from the elevation of the team’s output.

Follow Operative (@Operative) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.

Will Alternative TV Currencies Ever Be More Than A Nielsen Add-On?

Ever since Nielsen was dinged for undercounting TV viewers during the pandemic, its competitors have been fighting to convince buyers and sellers alike to adopt them as alternatives. And yet, some industry insiders argue that alt currencies weren’t ever meant to supplant Nielsen.