Home Social Media Twitter IPO Update: Market Cap Rises, IBM Brings Patent Suit Relating To Ads

Twitter IPO Update: Market Cap Rises, IBM Brings Patent Suit Relating To Ads

SHARE:

twitter-tickerIt’s good news/bad news for the Twitter IPO today. The company has raised its price range to $23-$25 per share, suggesting strong demand. It also faces an intellectual property infringement claim from IBM — relating in part to ad technology.

To address the upside first: At the upper end of its new range Twitter would raise as much as $2 billion and be valued at $13.9 billion. (The earlier range was $17-$20, with a midrange market cap of about $10 billion.) The higher price can be spun a few ways. Does it hint at higher-than-expected demand, as some reports have suggested? Or simply prove that the underwriters are, as a rule, exercising caution in setting IPO price ranges?

In the ad-tech sphere, the recent experiences of Criteo and Rocket Fuel may be illustrative. Both companies raised their price range in the weeks prior to their public offering (Rocket Fuel once and Criteo twice). Underwriting banks prefer to start low and leave some “upside” in the price – in other words, price conservatively. If a new stock IPOs with some pent-up demand in its price, that helps ensure the ticker keeps climbing.

“Nothing is worse for bankers than a busted IPO, which is when the stock breaks below the IPO price on first day of trading,” Richard Fetyko, SVP Internet tech and media for ABR Investment Strategy LLC. “This creates angry investors who won’t do IPO deals with you anymore or will be hesitant to do so if bankers get too greedy trying to price a deal to the highest price of marginal buyer.”

In other words, it might have been more surprising if Twitter hadn’t increased its price range.

And for the bad news today: Twitter is on the receiving end of a patent-infringement allegation from IBM, it disclosed in an updated S-1 form. The challenge covers three patents, including one related to advertising. U.S. Patent No. 7,072,849 covers a “method for presenting advertising in an interactive service.” Here’s the language in the S-1:

“From time to time we receive claims from third parties which allege that we have infringed upon their intellectual property rights. In this regard, we recently received a letter from International Business Machines Corporation, or IBM, alleging that we infringe on at least three U.S. patents held by IBM, and inviting us to negotiate a business resolution of the allegations. The three patents specifically identified by IBM in the letter were U.S. Patent No. 6,957,224: Efficient retrieval of uniform resource locators, U.S. Patent No. 7,072,849: Method for presenting advertising in an interactive service and U.S. Patent No. 7,099,862: Programmatic discovery of common contacts.”

Regarding the defensibility of the patents and future legal exposure, Twitter said:

“Based upon our preliminary review of these patents, we believe we have meritorious defenses to IBM’s allegations, although there can be no assurance that we will be successful in defending against these allegations or reaching a business resolution that is satisfactory to us. Further, from time to time we may introduce new products and services, including in areas where we currently do not have an offering, which could increase our exposure to patent and other intellectual property claims from competitors and non-practicing entities. In addition…some of our agreements with advertisers, platform partners and data partners require us to indemnify them for certain intellectual property claims against them, which could require us to incur considerable costs in defending such claims, and may require us to pay significant damages in the event of an adverse ruling.”

IBM did not respond to a request for more information by press time.

Must Read

Wall Street Wants To Know What The Programmatic Drama Is About

Competitive tensions and ad tech drama have flared all year. And this drama has rippled out into the investor circle, as evident from a slew of recent ad tech company earnings reports.

Comic: Always Be Paddling

Omnicom Allegedly Pivoted A Chunk Of Its Q3 Spend From The Trade Desk To Amazon

Two sources at ad tech platforms that observe programmatic bidding patterns said they’ve seen Omnicom agencies shifting spend from The Trade Desk to Amazon DSP in Q3. The Trade Desk denies any such shift.

influencer creator shouting in megaphone

Agentio Announces $40M In Series B Funding To Connect Brands With Relevant Creators

With its latest funding, Agentio plans to expand its team and to establish creator marketing as part of every advertiser’s media plan.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Google Rolls Out Chatbot Agents For Marketers

Google on Wednesday announced the full availability of its new agentic AI tools, called Ads Advisor and Analytics Advisor.

Amazon Ads Is All In On Simplicity

“We just constantly hear how complex it is right now,” Kelly MacLean, Amazon Ads VP of engineering, science and product, tells AdExchanger. “So that’s really where we we’ve anchored a lot on hearing their feedback, [and] figuring out how we can drive even more simplicity.”

Betrayal, business, deal, greeting, competition concept. Lie deception and corporate dishonesty illustration. Businessmen leaders entrepreneurs making agreement holding concealing knives behind backs.

How PubMatic Countered A Big DSP’s Spending Dip In Q3 (And Our Theory On Who It Was)

In July, PubMatic saw a temporary drop in ad spend from a “large” unnamed DSP partner, which contributed to Q3 revenue of $68 million, a 5% YOY decline.