Home Privacy Google Plans To Ring In The New Year With Third-Party Cookie Deprecation (For Real)

Google Plans To Ring In The New Year With Third-Party Cookie Deprecation (For Real)

SHARE:
Comic: Cookies n' Chrome

Mark your calendars for Jan. 4, 2024, all you deprecation skeptics.

That’s the day Google will release a new browser feature called Tracking Protection. When enabled, it will automatically cut off a website’s access to third-party cookies.

On Jan. 4, Chrome will activate Tracking Protection for 1% of a randomly selected group of Chrome users globally.

People will know they’ve been chosen if they see a modal pop up on the right side of the address bar in their browser when they open Chrome either on desktop or Android. The modal will say “Browse with more privacy” beside an eye-shaped icon with a strike through it.

So long as the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority, which has oversight of the Chrome Privacy Sandbox, doesn’t halt the implementation process over competition concerns, Google appears on track to completely phase out third-party cookies in Chrome by the end of next year.

This is “a key milestone in our Privacy Sandbox initiative,” wrote Anthony Chavez, VP of product management for the Privacy Sandbox, in a blog post on Thursday announcing the rollout.

This is not a test

In September – more than three and a half years after first announcing its plan to phase out third-party cookies – Google officially made the APIs in the Chrome Privacy Sandbox generally available.

From that point, developers and ad tech companies could more easily ramp up their testing efforts and integrate the APIs into their own solutions.

But testing overall has been slow, particularly on the buy side.

Well over half (61%) of US marketers and media planners haven’t started testing the Chrome Privacy Sandbox, according to a survey conducted in late October by Blis and Sapio Research. Yet a full 98% of marketers say they’re concerned about signal loss and the disappearance of third-party cookies. (Go figure.)

Google is confident, however, that testing will gain momentum (although perhaps that’s because there’s no longer any choice).

Over the summer, Victor Wong, senior director of product for the Privacy Sandbox on Chrome and Android, told AdExchanger that general availability “should be a strong signal to companies that now is the time to begin integrating the APIs if they have not started already.”

Google also says it’s trying to make live testing as painless as possible, which is why Tracking Protection is rolling out so slowly.

“We’re starting with a small percentage of Chrome users so developers can test their readiness for a web without third-party cookies,” Chavez wrote.

And if it turns out that a site can’t function properly during the 1%-of-users phase, Chrome will automatically surface an option to disable Tracking Protection and temporarily switch cookies back on so as not to disrupt the browsing experience while the site works out its kinks before full-on deprecation.

A line in the sandbox

But there are some out there that would prefer to disable the Privacy Sandbox itself altogether.

In a column posted earlier this week on The Current, which is The Trade Desk’s content marketing site, the company’s VP of product, Bill Simmons, didn’t mince words on his view of the Privacy Sandbox. He called it “a massive investment in a project that could make the open internet a worse place for advertisers and publishers.”

Simmons argues that the Privacy Sandbox initiative will only lead to depressed ad prices and slower page loads while simultaneously entrenching Google’s power over the online advertising ecosystem.

“It’s unfortunate that the leadership at Google has plotted a course based on its own interests rather than those of the ad industry at large,” Simmons wrote. “To protect the privacy of users, you don’t have to create a system that makes it harder to earn revenue as an open internet publisher.”

Must Read

New WBD Report Makes The Case For Getting The Measurement Basics Right

Warner Bros. Discovery has a new white paper analyzing the data and methodologies of five top video measurement providers: VideoAmp, iSpot, Comscore, Innovid and Samba.

Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

Google And The DOJ Filed Their Proposed Final Judgments In The Ad Tech Case – Here’s What They’re Still Arguing About

Google and the Department of Justice filed the next round of paperwork that will determine what Google’s punishment will look like in the ad tech antitrust case.

T-Mobile Brings Its Mobile Data Exclusively To Vistar To Scale Up DOOH Targeting

Advertisers can now use Vistar to activate both off-the-shelf and custom audiences built on T-Mobile’s first-party location and app data.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Apple Has Far-Reaching Plans To Block Hundreds Of Programmatic Data Companies From iOS

Apple’s WebKit crackdown appears to extend well beyond The Trade Desk, putting hundreds of ad tech, data and identity vendors on a mysterious, dynamically updated block list.

Josh Reed, Zoom's VP of brand and content, speaking at AdExchanger's Programmatic IO event in New York City (September 28, 2006)

Zoom’s Marketing Challenge Is That It’s Too Well Known For Its Own Good

Zoom has 99% unaided brand awareness, which sounds great on paper. But there’s a catch: Most people still think it’s just a video-call app.

Why Agencies Think They Shouldn’t Own Agentic AI Tools Or The Data Used To Build Them

Agencies are differentiating their tech stacks by building custom agentic AI tools for their clients. And they’re rethinking owning those AI tools – particularly since licensing them creates new revenue streams.