Home Politics The 2016 Election Will Disrupt Marketers’ Social Strategies

The 2016 Election Will Disrupt Marketers’ Social Strategies

SHARE:

mitchdunnAdExchanger Politics” is a new weekly column tracking developments in the 2016 political campaign cycle.

Today’s column is written by Mitch Dunn, senior vice president at Empower MediaMarketing.

Facebook as marketers know it is about to change, and we have super PACs to thank.

Due to the increasing prominence of super PACs, political fundraising is skyrocketing. As a result, political players are willing to spend a lot of premium dollars to deliver their messages via advertising. As people shift more of their time from traditional media to online, politicians are expected to do the same. Political campaigns, like marketers, want to be where people are, and that place is Facebook.

Facebook was already the most popular social platform for political advertising in 2014, according to The New York Times, and 2016 is expected to continue that trend. This is partially due to the targeting options available on the platform. As political organizations get more sophisticated about targeting certain demographics, Facebook offers a vast array of targeting that uses reliable demographic information.

For instance, if a campaign needed to target women from 18 to 24 years old in a specific ZIP code, they could use Facebook’s first-party data to target those exact people. Furthermore, Facebook has a unique feature that allows campaigns to upload an email list of their supporters, matching them to Facebook users and allowing campaigns to target their supporters quickly and efficiently, something that President Barack Obama’s 2012 re-election campaign did to great effect.

With Facebook political advertising spend continuing to grow, it could pose two unique problems to other marketers on Facebook.

Crowded News Feeds, Unpredictable CPMs

Due to Facebook’s strict limit on news feed ad frequency, if more campaigns continue to use Facebook, there could be a crowding-out effect for marketers. Since individual ads can only appear on Facebook twice a day, if there are more total ads, individual ad space in the news feed is likely to be limited.

There is also an issue of unpredictable CPMs. One notable trait of political campaigns is that they will typically focus on extremely small segments of the population, also known as microtargeting, and spend liberally to reach these specific segments. Thus, if a marketer is also targeting similar segments on Facebook, they may notice higher CPMs than normal for brief periods of time.

Reacting To The Potential Problems

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Diligence, adaptability and diversification are key through next November.

Advertisers will have to be diligent about monitoring their Facebook campaigns to ensure that their CPMs stay stable. Also, if a desired target happens to be in high demand from political campaigns, it may be worth adapting by delaying a Facebook campaign until the election cycle is over or discontinuing Facebook audience segments in hotly contested swing states. Marketers could also use this as an opportunity to try something new on Facebook, such as a new tactic or testing of a niche target.

Finally, this may be a good time for marketers to diversify their social media mix. While Facebook remains the most popular social network, other networks, such as Snapchat and Instagram, offer great advertising options, and inventories on these sites may be less strained by political campaigns.

Follow Empower MediaMarketing (@EmpowerMM) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

The Arena Group's Stephanie Mazzamaro (left) chats with ad tech consultant Addy Atienza at AdMonsters' Sell Side Summit Austin.

For Publishers, AI Gives Monetizable Data Insight But Takes Away Traffic

Traffic-starved publishers are hopeful that their long-undervalued audience data will fuel advertising’s automated future – if only they can finally wrest control of the industry narrative away from ad tech middlemen.

Q3: The Trade Desk Delivers On Financials, But Is Its Vision Fact Or Fantasy?

The Trade Desk posted solid Q3 results on Thursday, with $739 million in revenue, up 18% year over year. But the main narrative for TTD this year is less about the numbers and more about optics and competitive dynamics.

Comic: He Sees You When You're Streaming

IP Address Match Rates Are a Joke – And It’s No Laughing Matter

According to a new report, IP-to-email matches are accurate just 16% of the time on average, while IP-to-postal matches are accurate only 13% of the time. (Oof.)

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: Gamechanger (Google lost the DOJ's search antitrust case)

The DOJ And Google Sharpen Their Remedy Proposals As The Two Sides Prepare For Closing Arguments

The phrase “caution is key” has become a totem of the new age in US antitrust regulation. It was cited this week by both the DOJ and Google in support of opposing views on a possible divestiture of Google’s sell-side ad exchange.

create a network of points with nodes and connections, plain white background; use variations of green and grey for the dots and the connctions; 85% empty space

Alt Identity Provider ID5 Buys TrueData, Marking Its First-Ever Acquisition

ID5 bought TrueData mainly to tackle what ID5 CEO Mathieu Roche calls the “massive fragmentation” of digital identity, which is a problem on the user side and the provider side.

CTV Manufacturers Have A New Tool For Catching Spoofed Devices

The IAB Tech Lab’s new device attestation feature for its Open Measurement SDK provides a scaled way for original device manufacturers to confirm that ad impressions are associated with real devices.