Home Politics The 2016 Election Will Disrupt Marketers’ Social Strategies

The 2016 Election Will Disrupt Marketers’ Social Strategies

SHARE:

mitchdunnAdExchanger Politics” is a new weekly column tracking developments in the 2016 political campaign cycle.

Today’s column is written by Mitch Dunn, senior vice president at Empower MediaMarketing.

Facebook as marketers know it is about to change, and we have super PACs to thank.

Due to the increasing prominence of super PACs, political fundraising is skyrocketing. As a result, political players are willing to spend a lot of premium dollars to deliver their messages via advertising. As people shift more of their time from traditional media to online, politicians are expected to do the same. Political campaigns, like marketers, want to be where people are, and that place is Facebook.

Facebook was already the most popular social platform for political advertising in 2014, according to The New York Times, and 2016 is expected to continue that trend. This is partially due to the targeting options available on the platform. As political organizations get more sophisticated about targeting certain demographics, Facebook offers a vast array of targeting that uses reliable demographic information.

For instance, if a campaign needed to target women from 18 to 24 years old in a specific ZIP code, they could use Facebook’s first-party data to target those exact people. Furthermore, Facebook has a unique feature that allows campaigns to upload an email list of their supporters, matching them to Facebook users and allowing campaigns to target their supporters quickly and efficiently, something that President Barack Obama’s 2012 re-election campaign did to great effect.

With Facebook political advertising spend continuing to grow, it could pose two unique problems to other marketers on Facebook.

Crowded News Feeds, Unpredictable CPMs

Due to Facebook’s strict limit on news feed ad frequency, if more campaigns continue to use Facebook, there could be a crowding-out effect for marketers. Since individual ads can only appear on Facebook twice a day, if there are more total ads, individual ad space in the news feed is likely to be limited.

There is also an issue of unpredictable CPMs. One notable trait of political campaigns is that they will typically focus on extremely small segments of the population, also known as microtargeting, and spend liberally to reach these specific segments. Thus, if a marketer is also targeting similar segments on Facebook, they may notice higher CPMs than normal for brief periods of time.

Reacting To The Potential Problems

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Diligence, adaptability and diversification are key through next November.

Advertisers will have to be diligent about monitoring their Facebook campaigns to ensure that their CPMs stay stable. Also, if a desired target happens to be in high demand from political campaigns, it may be worth adapting by delaying a Facebook campaign until the election cycle is over or discontinuing Facebook audience segments in hotly contested swing states. Marketers could also use this as an opportunity to try something new on Facebook, such as a new tactic or testing of a niche target.

Finally, this may be a good time for marketers to diversify their social media mix. While Facebook remains the most popular social network, other networks, such as Snapchat and Instagram, offer great advertising options, and inventories on these sites may be less strained by political campaigns.

Follow Empower MediaMarketing (@EmpowerMM) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.