Home Measurement The JIC And The MRC Clarify Their Purpose And How They’re Different

The JIC And The MRC Clarify Their Purpose And How They’re Different

SHARE:

The TV currency space was contentious enough before the broadcaster-backed joint industry committee (JIC) formed last year to help set cross-platform video measurement standards.

But isn’t that what the Media Rating Council (MRC) is for?

As the competition intensifies, buyers and sellers are debating whether it’s valuable to have two bodies that appear to meet the same need – or whether it’s just plain confusing.

So, on Wednesday, the MRC and JIC released a joint statement to clarify the difference between them, which has been “a charged topic” over the past few months, Brittany Slattery, CMO of OpenAP, the data activation platform behind the JIC, told AdExchanger.

For example, there’s the misconception that the JIC and MRC are competitors, which is not the case, Slattery said. Their common goal is to help standardize measurement, not to take sides in the currency competition.

“We’re not here to tell buyers and sellers which currencies to use,” Slattery said. “We’re just here to provide transparency and guidance.”

Accreditation vs. certification

It’s especially critical for the two orgs to set the record straight before upfront negotiations begin in May.

First and foremost, both groups agree that MRC accreditation is a far more rigorous process than JIC certification.

“The MRC goes much further in conducting intensive audits of measurement methodology,” according to the joint statement, the purpose of which is to make sure measurement companies do what they say they do.

The downside is that MRC accreditation literally takes years. Just look at Comscore. It took three years before the company finally secured its accreditation for national and local ratings just last week.

But a whole lot can change in three years, and “buyers and sellers can’t wait” for MRC accreditation before experimenting with currency alternatives to Nielsen, Slattery said.

That is where the JIC comes in. It’s working with buyers and sellers to create “a baseline consensus” as to what a currency needs before both sides will agree to transact on it, Slattery said.

Still, JIC certification is an involved process.

In September, the JIC awarded conditional certification to Comscore, VideoAmp and iSpot for transparency into census-level data. To get conditional certification, companies had to prove they had a privacy and data governance strategy, big data sets (as opposed to just panels), transparency into match rates and integrations with clean rooms and programmatic platforms.

The next step, which is ongoing, is deciding which currencies deserve full certification. This involves a deeper dive into each currency contender’s data sets, such as checking them for errors and determining whether they’re stable enough to create campaign forecasts, Slattery said.

Currencies with full certification will get access to the streaming data product the JIC is building, which will include first-party data from publishers and agencies participating in the committee.

Rumor had it

The JIC also used the joint statement as an opportunity to clarify its stance on MRC accreditation.

In April, Nielsen accused the JIC of essentially bypassing the MRC by merely suggesting that currencies seek MRC accreditation rather than requiring it as part of its certification process.

As a result, Nielsen refused to join the JIC (its stance remains unchanged), and some JIC members suggested that Nielsen was “weaponizing the MRC” as leverage against its alternative currency competitors.

Wednesday’s statement is an attempt to clear the air.

“The JIC’s goal is for measurement companies to hold both JIC certification as well as MRC accreditation,” it reads. And if a currency provider hasn’t yet been accredited by the MRC, the JIC requires it to at least be “in active audit with the MRC” in order to be eligible for JIC certification.

And that’s that on that.

State of the union

At this point, you may be wondering about the accreditation and certification status of the top currency companies. Here’s the latest:

Must Read

Comic: Game Over?

The Google Antitrust Remedies Are Too Little, Too Late – But Publishers Will Take What They Can Get

Given how much the market has changed since the Google trial began, and the wiggle room in the ruling itself, publishers aren’t expecting much relief from the court’s behavioral remedies.

Comic: "Deal ID, please."

Can Sell-Side Curation Solve The Cookieless Audience Problem For Advertisers?

Indie agency KWG says sell-side curation can target more high-performing inventory with better match rates and lower data fees than buy-side curation.

Infillion Acquires Foursquare, Adding More Location Data To Its Ever-Growing Ad Tech Stack

Infillion checked in with its latest acquisition on Friday: Foursquare. Apparently, if there’s a strategically interesting or distressed ad tech asset on the market, Infillion will find it.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

HBO MAX’s Reddit Account Was Compromised And Used For Ad Fraud

A week ago, HBO MAX had its verified Reddit account overrun by a hacker group, which eluded notice for two days while it ran 108 different ad permutations targeting an unknown number of Redditors.

Gaming Wants To Prove It’s Just Like Other Media Channels – While Also Owning How It’s Different

Adapting other channels’ strategies might be what gaming platforms need to do to get advertisers comfortable spending more. Leaning into gaming’s differentiators will come later, after bigger budgets arrive.

Comic: Clickbait

Taboola Eyes The Finance Vertical With An Offer To Acquire Ad Network Dianomi

Taboola has made an offer to buy Dianomi, a UK-based ad tech company that connects financial advertisers with premium business and finance publishers.