Home Measurement The JIC And The MRC Clarify Their Purpose And How They’re Different

The JIC And The MRC Clarify Their Purpose And How They’re Different

SHARE:

The TV currency space was contentious enough before the broadcaster-backed joint industry committee (JIC) formed last year to help set cross-platform video measurement standards.

But isn’t that what the Media Rating Council (MRC) is for?

As the competition intensifies, buyers and sellers are debating whether it’s valuable to have two bodies that appear to meet the same need – or whether it’s just plain confusing.

So, on Wednesday, the MRC and JIC released a joint statement to clarify the difference between them, which has been “a charged topic” over the past few months, Brittany Slattery, CMO of OpenAP, the data activation platform behind the JIC, told AdExchanger.

For example, there’s the misconception that the JIC and MRC are competitors, which is not the case, Slattery said. Their common goal is to help standardize measurement, not to take sides in the currency competition.

“We’re not here to tell buyers and sellers which currencies to use,” Slattery said. “We’re just here to provide transparency and guidance.”

Accreditation vs. certification

It’s especially critical for the two orgs to set the record straight before upfront negotiations begin in May.

First and foremost, both groups agree that MRC accreditation is a far more rigorous process than JIC certification.

“The MRC goes much further in conducting intensive audits of measurement methodology,” according to the joint statement, the purpose of which is to make sure measurement companies do what they say they do.

The downside is that MRC accreditation literally takes years. Just look at Comscore. It took three years before the company finally secured its accreditation for national and local ratings just last week.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

But a whole lot can change in three years, and “buyers and sellers can’t wait” for MRC accreditation before experimenting with currency alternatives to Nielsen, Slattery said.

That is where the JIC comes in. It’s working with buyers and sellers to create “a baseline consensus” as to what a currency needs before both sides will agree to transact on it, Slattery said.

Still, JIC certification is an involved process.

In September, the JIC awarded conditional certification to Comscore, VideoAmp and iSpot for transparency into census-level data. To get conditional certification, companies had to prove they had a privacy and data governance strategy, big data sets (as opposed to just panels), transparency into match rates and integrations with clean rooms and programmatic platforms.

The next step, which is ongoing, is deciding which currencies deserve full certification. This involves a deeper dive into each currency contender’s data sets, such as checking them for errors and determining whether they’re stable enough to create campaign forecasts, Slattery said.

Currencies with full certification will get access to the streaming data product the JIC is building, which will include first-party data from publishers and agencies participating in the committee.

Rumor had it

The JIC also used the joint statement as an opportunity to clarify its stance on MRC accreditation.

In April, Nielsen accused the JIC of essentially bypassing the MRC by merely suggesting that currencies seek MRC accreditation rather than requiring it as part of its certification process.

As a result, Nielsen refused to join the JIC (its stance remains unchanged), and some JIC members suggested that Nielsen was “weaponizing the MRC” as leverage against its alternative currency competitors.

Wednesday’s statement is an attempt to clear the air.

“The JIC’s goal is for measurement companies to hold both JIC certification as well as MRC accreditation,” it reads. And if a currency provider hasn’t yet been accredited by the MRC, the JIC requires it to at least be “in active audit with the MRC” in order to be eligible for JIC certification.

And that’s that on that.

State of the union

At this point, you may be wondering about the accreditation and certification status of the top currency companies. Here’s the latest:

Must Read

How AudienceMix Is Mixing Up The Data Sales Business

AudienceMix, a new curation startup, aims to make it more cost effective to mix and match different audience segments using only the data brands need to execute their campaigns.

Broadsign Acquires Place Exchange As The DOOH Category Hits Its Stride

On Tuesday, digital out-of-home (DOOH) ad tech startup Place Exchange was acquired by Broadsign, another out-of-home SSP.

Meta’s Ad Platform Is Going Haywire In Time For The Holidays (Again)

For the uninitiated, “Glitchmas” is our name for what’s become an annual tradition when, from between roughly late October through November, Meta’s ad platform just seems to go bonkers.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

Closing Arguments Are Done In The US v. Google Ad Tech Case

The publisher-focused DOJ v. Google ad tech antitrust trial is finished. A judge will now decide the fate of Google’s sell-side ad tech business.

Wall Street Wants To Know What The Programmatic Drama Is About

Competitive tensions and ad tech drama have flared all year. And this drama has rippled out into the investor circle, as evident from a slew of recent ad tech company earnings reports.

Comic: Always Be Paddling

Omnicom Allegedly Pivoted A Chunk Of Its Q3 Spend From The Trade Desk To Amazon

Two sources at ad tech platforms that observe programmatic bidding patterns said they’ve seen Omnicom agencies shifting spend from The Trade Desk to Amazon DSP in Q3. The Trade Desk denies any such shift.