Home Digital TV and Video Can The Opt-Out Move More Ad Budgets To OTT? Videology And Tru Optik Bet It Will

Can The Opt-Out Move More Ad Budgets To OTT? Videology And Tru Optik Bet It Will

SHARE:

Ad buyers decry the absence of addressability in OTT inventory, which they claim lacks the targeting and measurement capabilities to which digital buyers are accustomed.

But an integration between Videology’s cross-screen video platform and Tru Optik’s CTV device graph, revealed Wednesday, aims to bring more addressability to OTT advertisers – at scale.

Previously, Videology would target OTT audiences using workarounds, like indexing ZIP codes against any available data set because of the lack of addressable data.

And while there is addressability at scale in OTT, it’s mostly been on an individual app or device-level basis. Roku and Hulu both bake anonymized subscriber data into the ad serve to improve targeting and measurability.

But there is inventory beyond Roku and Hulu, as many content providers and publishers host apps across other devices like Amazon Fire TV, Xbox, Sony PlayStation, Chromecast and Apple TV.

And as more OTT inventory is sold programmatically, and eventually makes its way into exchange environments, the need to maintain a good user experience in OTT has grown among brand clients, said Andre Swanston, CEO of Tru Optik.

Videology and Tru Optik hope to get more devices and apps into providing more targetable, measurable inventory by doing something that might seem counterintuitive: making it easier for consumers to opt out of interest-based ads or behavioral targeting altogether. 

“We’re supporting the ability to do OTT targeting at the household level cross-device and cross-channel,” said Aleck Schleider, SVP of data and client strategy for Videology, “but [only in a way where we’re] managing opt-outs across all channels we’re targeting.”

The two ad tech vendors are betting that in so doing, OTT stakeholders will be less fearful of potential privacy concerns as more data is appended to IP-based targeting. (Smart-TV manufacturer Vizio became the poster child for the industry’s need for a sound connected-TV opt-out policy.)

And it will create a better user experience, as the ability to target down to the IP level (and to know when a user has opted out) could help address challenges around frequency management and cross-device measurement, said Francois Lee, EVP and investment director at MDC Partners’ media agency, Assembly.

“Whether it’s sequential storytelling or a custom ad made for that one device, there’s a lot of potential for where this can go,” Lee said.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

In the end, media budgets won’t migrate to OTT en masse without better measurement and targeting.

Network A+E, which uses Videology’s video platform as a demand source and has private exchanges with its mobile, OTT and VOD inventory, constantly fields questions from ad buyers about whether it can pass certain bid attributes about the user, household or content that’s being ingested.

“It was a frustration for us because we knew we had extremely valuable inventory being watched on a big screen, on demand, by a consumer [who’s] engaged,” said Jason DeMarco, VP of programmatic and audience solutions for A+E Networks. “But the lack of targetability prevented us from extracting the true value of that inventory.”

Moreover, because OTT lacks standards and comprehensive measurement, there was virtually no way of knowing whether an ad was served to the same household numerous times when fulfilling an ad request.

“We do everything we can to restrict frequency, but what complicates this is all of the fragmentation in current tech stacks, as well as [the lack of standardized] ad serving in OTT,” DeMarco added. “Unfortunately, the industry is not controlling for frequency the way it should, and that came at the expense of the user.”

Since Videology can now match OTT impressions to an IP-based device graph built for OTT, Tru Optik’s Swanston claims it will help create more consistency across publishers around measuring the number of household devices exposed to an ad – and at what frequency.

Must Read

Comic: Gamechanger (Google lost the DOJ's search antitrust case)

DOJ v. Google: How Judge Brinkema Seems To Be Thinking After Week One

Where the DOJ v. Google ad tech antitrust trial stands after one week’s worth of remedies arguments.

Swish, A Company That's Bringing Programmatic to Product Sampling, Announces Seed Funding

Swish, a startup that partners with retailers to provide product full-size CPG samples to people doing their grocery shopping online, announces $2.3 million in seed funding.

DOJ v. Google: During Opening Arguments, The DOJ And Google Battle Over An AdX Divestiture

Court is back in session. And the fate of  the open internet is in the balance.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Chris Mufarrige, director, Bureau of Consumer Protection, FTC

FTC Consumer Protection Chief: No Easy Answers On Privacy, ‘Only Trade-Offs’

Privacy isn’t black-and-white, says the FTC’s Chris Mufarrige, promising evidence-driven consumer protection cases under the Trump administration.

How Encryption Keys Could Resolve The TID Furor

Rather than sharing universal TIDs that any DSP or curator can access, Raptive says publishers should instead share encrypted TIDs with an encryption key provided only to trusted demand-side partners.

Clear Channel Brings Mid-Flight Measurement To Its OOH Network

Clear Channel will provide advertisers weekly, mid-flight reports on outcomes driven by its inventory in order to bring OOH measurement closer to the speed of digital.