Home Data-Driven Thinking Why Do Your Best Friends Text You But Not Your Favorite Brands?

Why Do Your Best Friends Text You But Not Your Favorite Brands?

SHARE:

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media. 

Today’s column is written by Jeff Nicholson, CEO at Tracer and chief media officer at VaynerMedia.

These days, most people communicate with their best friends via messaging. I’d even go as far as to say that the world is dominated by numerous chat platforms, whether it’s WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger, WeChat or just a simple text message. Like it or not, it’s how we all communicate. Heck, I even use text messaging to communicate with my team most of the time.

So, why have brands not embraced this as a way to directly communicate with their customers?

Is it because they don’t want your money? (That would be hard to believe.) Or is it simply that they don’t know how to leverage the opportunities that exist on these messaging platforms, where people are literally waiting to be sold to?

To find out, I decided to jump on a number of messaging platforms to test how brands currently communicate with customers. Over the past few months, I’ve been messaging some of my favorite brands via Facebook Messenger and Twitter, among others, and to be honest, I don’t feel loved. I reached out to some just to say “Hi!” and others to ask specific questions. But most didn’t even respond. I’m handing them the opportunity to sell to me on a platter; why would they not respond? 

I’m not here to call out brands specifically, but I do want to point out the opportunities so many brands are missing when it comes to building stronger relationships with existing and potential customers.

For example, I messaged a major financial institution in the United States who has more than a million “friends” on Facebook Messenger, yet I’m still waiting for a response two months later. If this was my actual friend, I’d be pretty upset with them, and I definitely wouldn’t give them my money nor my loyalty.

Why do we not hold the brands we fund with our own dollars to the same standards that we hold our friends?

In contrast, when I asked one of the biggest airlines in the Unites States about their credit card program, it responded immediately, clarified my question and then effectively pointed me in the right direction. I felt loved.

However, it did not proactively follow up to see if I’d signed up for the card or needed any further help. It had an opportunity to extend the relationship from acquaintance to friend territory just by checking in to see how I was doing.

And this is what I mean by missed opportunities.

Brands must realize that we live in a world dominated by mobile penetration. Before mobile, the touch point for the consumer was the store shelf where people could interact with the actual product. Now this touch point is in the form of a digital device in the palm of everyone’s hands. It’s become more accessible, and as a result, brands must adapt to be a little more savvy in how they communicate. They have the opportunity to teach consumers new habits and ways of interacting with them. It’s an opportunity to improve customer service, upsell and reverse potentially negative brand interactions. Not to mention the cost savings – people are expensive and chatbots are cheap!

With consumers growing tired of constant interruptions from brands on their mobile devices, developing a one-on-one relationship with them via whatever messaging platform they use is a win-win for everyone, but it needs to be consensual. It needs to add value. It needs to build that personal one-on-one relationship and not feel like an annoying interruption. It needs to feel like you’re texting with a friend. If a brand can achieve that, they will make their consumers feel the love and, in turn, they will feel the love back.

We should have higher standards for the brands we invest in.

So, I challenge marketers to see if they feel loved by their own brands like they do when receiving their best friends’ texts.

Follow VaynerMedia (@VaynerMedia) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Tagged in:

Must Read

Nielsen’s Latest Updates Aim To Remove Bias From Its Measurement Strategy

Just in time for new TV programming to hit the screens in September, Nielsen is rolling out a few upgrades to its video measurement currency that will go live by the end of August

The Agency Black Box Is Breaking. Horizon Media’s Bob Lord Explains Why

According to Horizon Media’s Bob Lord, most agencies are trying to solve the wrong problem by obsessing over cost efficiency at a time when AI has quietly unlocked something far more valuable: the ability to become a growth partner to advertisers.

Taking A Look At Tuple, A New Entrant To The Ossified DSP Market

Tuple is entering the DSP market at a strange and tense moment for third-party ad tech. “There’s just so much animosity” between the programmatic buy and sell sides, says Founder and CEO Doug Lauretano.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
AdExchanger's Big Story podcast with journalistic insights on advertising, marketing and ad tech

AppLovin’s Play To Reach Non-Gaming Advertisers

Gaming apps are filled with ads for more gaming apps. Why not other advertisers? We go inside AppLovin’s play to bring non-gaming advertisers into the fold.

Andrea Kwiatek, director of strategic partnerships at Goodway Group

Agentic AI Is A Shiny New Object, But Supply-Path Optimization Is A Reality Check

AI can help make media buying more efficient. But it’ll take some more time before AI agents are a seamless part of the modern media buying process, says Goodway Group’s Andrea Kwiatek, director of strategic partnerships.

Pinterest Names Jason Fairchild GM Of Programmatic And Affiliate

Pinterest expanded tvScientific CEO and Co-Founder Jason Fairchild’s title to general manager of programmatic and affiliate. The title upgrade comes less than a year after Pinterest acquired the performance-focused CTV ad startup.