Home Data-Driven Thinking Video Ad Targeting Isn’t Behavioral Because It’s Not Direct-Response

Video Ad Targeting Isn’t Behavioral Because It’s Not Direct-Response

SHARE:

gregsmithtremor“Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Greg Smith, vice president of programmatic at Tremor Video.

Display ads are most commonly used for direct-response campaigns that rely on behavioral targeting. Video ads, by contrast, generally do not rely on behavior targeting for their success. Marketers who try to use video as a direct-response vehicle are going to be very disappointed.

For display advertising, data derived from online behaviors is like gold. A consumer can look online at buying a set of golf clubs, for example, and maybe even put them into his cart. Then, thanks to cookies and real-time big data analysis, a display ad can be served prompting him to complete his order, with more ads following him around the Internet with offers for other golf accessories or even travel and resort packages.

Some Data Is More Important

As with our golfing example above, retargeting data is the most important piece of behavioral information used for display and direct-response campaigns. Via the magic of cookies it’s a simple matter to show reinforcing or complementary display ads wherever a consumer goes digitally.

Also important to display ad targeting is intent data from a consumer’s behavior on the Internet as a whole. Here, a visit to a particular product page, a search query or a content download each provides information about a particular consumer, and informs the display ads he later sees. By contrast, demographic and modeled-data targeting are not nearly as useful for direct-response as retargeting and intent data.

Display ads work because of their end goal, which is a transaction, either via click- or view-through. If I’m interested in those golf clubs or a trip to Pebble Beach, all I have to do is click through and I’ve completed the transaction the advertiser set out for me to do. Voilà – a direct response.

Video ads, like television, are a branding vehicle. Video ad targeting is greatly informed by site targeting and the demos associated with those sites. Branding segments are generally larger than direct-response segments and broader in nature. Nonetheless, specificity in branding segment have come a long way in the past few years via actual modeled data with inferred attributes of a consumer’s locale, aggregated down to the ZIP code level from dozens or hundreds of different sources.

The granularity can be significant, and may include affluence, credit worthiness, home ownership, education, marital status, presence of children, purchase behavior, religion and politics. Knowing this information allows video advertisers to serve up the right video ad to the right person at the right time.

Types Of Targeting For Different Campaigns

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

All this is why, generally speaking, marketers who have applied direct-response goals to video campaigns have been disappointed. Video, as a branding channel, relies on completely different types data than display ads. As a general rule, do not use video ads as you would display ads.

One more piece of data informs the success of video ads: the value of surrounding video inventory on a site. Here, a strong video ad placed on a premium site benefits from other powerful videos on the site because people are drawn to quality. Inventory quality prompts engagement and video views right down to the very end.

None of this is to say that you should never use behavioral data for your video campaigns. The halo effect of a behaviorally targeted, multiscreen approach to video ads can pay big dividends to both direct-response display ads and other branding efforts. But when it comes to online video ads, don’t assume that display behavioral targeting segments will be the defining factor for KPI outcomes at scale.

Follow Greg Smith (@webadsguy), Tremor Video (@TremorVideo) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.

Will Alternative TV Currencies Ever Be More Than A Nielsen Add-On?

Ever since Nielsen was dinged for undercounting TV viewers during the pandemic, its competitors have been fighting to convince buyers and sellers alike to adopt them as alternatives. And yet, some industry insiders argue that alt currencies weren’t ever meant to supplant Nielsen.