Home Data-Driven Thinking Rethink Retargeting

Rethink Retargeting

SHARE:

marcgrabowskinewData-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Marc Grabowski, CEO at Iris Mobile.

Marketers need to reprioritize their remarketing and display reengagement decision stack because the status quo is antiquated.

Display remarketing, retargeting and reengagement – terms that will be used somewhat interchangeably here – were once fantastic methods for reengaging potential customers after a website visit or shopping cart abandonment. Over time, the precision of this retargeting has drastically improved, graduating from binary pixel-based retargeting, in order to find and retarget users with a single product they’d browsed, to a more intelligent model that includes matching users’ profiles with products they are most likely to purchase based on other customers in their cohorts.

These improvements and the generally positive performance have been addictive to marketers. In many cases, it has even demotivated marketers from looking for new ways of reengaging consumers, as display retargeting has shown so much success. Unfortunately, a lack of experimentation from retailers is slowly eating away at their margins and allowing competitors to take market share.

As technology continues to advance, marketers have become more educated. Prioritization of retargeting through display advertising is now an archaic model, because retailers have the ability to connect their owned data to owned distribution channels in ways they never could before.

Site pixels and app tracking, via mobile device ID, can connect to other pieces of owned data, such as email address, mobile phone number, point of sale and loyalty card numbers. As a result, paid advertising retargeting is no longer the only way to reengage a qualified customer. Instead, remarketing through owned communication channels should be prioritized in decision stacks above display. Display retargeting is the least efficient means to reach this customer and should only be used when all other means fail.

If you have not started thinking about building an owned data asset or deploying via owned channels, including email, mobile messaging and push notifications, you are a decade behind and need to start building this asset immediately.

Timeliness

Owned communications can be timelier than display because active targeting can be deployed. This is because display retargeting uses passive targeting, where the retailer is required to wait until the user stumbles across an ad on a publisher participating in a display network where the retailer has reach.

This contrasts with owned distribution channels, where a retail marketer can trigger an email at any time with a high likelihood of it being seen.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Personalization

The personalization strategy extends beyond customization of products and salutations. It should be seen as an awareness of a person’s timeline of engagements with a brand across channels. If that email is not opened within a set period of time, such as 5 minutes, then the marketer can have a mobile message immediately deployed. If this isn’t clicked within another 5 minutes, a push notification could be triggered, followed by a display ad. Should a user click or convert along the way, the rest of his or her journey should change to reflect these most recent actions.

Such a practice will quickly move a consumer through the buying funnel, reduce frustration of seeing duplicative – and unwanted – creative and improve the odds of conversion.

Costs

Owned channels allow precise, one-to-one reach at lower and more predictable costs than paid display channels.

Owned distribution channels require no media costs but have fixed distribution costs, such as email service provider, mobile messaging or push notification expenses. Moreover, with display retargeting, marketers are forced to pay a variable market rate for a paid retargeting spot to reach their own audience – a rate that fluctuates as demand ebbs and flows with that publisher. Marketers should not simply accept paying variable costs to reach their own customers, since it is their data that has informed the transaction between the publisher and the marketer.

All of this can only be accomplished if a marketer leverages a decisioning platform living above all distribution channels, including email, app notification, mobile messaging and display retargeting.

With this said, the decisioning layer doesn’t necessarily mean that marketers should replace their entire technology stack, because their current partners can still provide the plumbing to reach customers in various channels. The decisioning layer should simply interoperate with existing demand-side platforms, email service providers, mobile app tracking, SMS partners and CRM.

Such an integration will not eliminate display retargeting but will allow marketers to reduce it drastically in favor of reaching their consumers in a more timely, personal and cost-efficient manner through owned data and distribution channels.

Follow Marc Grabowski (@MarcTGrabowski), Iris Mobile (@Iris_Mobile) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

The FTC's latest staff report has strong message for social media and streaming video platforms: Stop engaging in the "vast surveillance" of consumers.

FTC Denounces Social Media And Video Streaming Platforms For ‘Privacy-Invasive’ Data Practices

The FTC’s latest staff report has strong message for social media and streaming video platforms: Stop engaging in the “vast surveillance” of consumers.

Publishers Feel Seen At The Google Ad Tech Antitrust Trial

Publishers were encouraged to see the DOJ highlight Google’s stranglehold on the ad server market and its attempts to weaken header bidding.

Albert Thompson, Managing Director, Digital at Walton Isaacson

To Cure What Ails Digital Advertising, Marketers And Publishers Must Get Back To Basics

Albert Thompson, a buy-side veteran with 20+ years of experience, weighs in on attention metrics, the value of MFA sites, brand safety backlash and how publishers can improve their inventory.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
A comic depiction of Google's ad machine sucking money out of a publisher.

DOJ vs. Google, Day Five Rewind: Prebid Reality Check, Unfair Rev Share And Jedi Blue (Sorta)

Someone will eventually need to make a Netflix-style documentary about the Google ad tech antitrust trial happening in Virginia. (And can we call it “You’ve Been Ad Served?”)

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.