Home Data-Driven Thinking Increased Consumer Expectations For Privacy Could Be A Good Thing For Advertisers

Increased Consumer Expectations For Privacy Could Be A Good Thing For Advertisers

SHARE:

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Keith Eadie, vice president and general manager at Adobe Advertising Cloud.

As the dust from Facebook’s Cambridge Analytica data breach settles, consumers and legislators alike are asking tough questions around how data is collected and used online — and whether people should have more control.

Industry reaction to potential legislation has been swift. The Association of National Advertisers recently warned: “Sometimes the cure can make the disease worse.”

While cool heads should prevail and the US should learn from the EU’s experience with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and forthcoming ePrivacy rules, increased consumer expectations for privacy – whether or not they are enshrined into law – do not have to spell doom for brands that have embraced data-driven marketing and advertising. In fact, it could help marketers in the long run by fueling a flight to quality with cleaner data and an increased emphasis on where ads run – ultimately creating better experiences for consumers.

In advertising, the rise of programmatic buying brought reduced waste and efficiency through automation and better targeting of ads. In the early days, that targeting was primarily fueled by third-party data acquired from outside sources on everything from demographics to shopping behavior. Most advertisers still rely on third-party data because it is easy and cheap – but not necessarily because it always works. Most Americans in a Deloitte survey [PDF] reported that third-party data about them was wrong at least half the time across several categories, including income, demographics, vehicle owned, interests and purchase behavior.

In a privacy-conscious society, advertisers can no longer take for granted where data comes from. Clean and transparent data sources – where consumers either explicitly opt in or better understand the trade-offs, such as when someone signs up for a hotel’s loyalty program and then sees personalized offers – take on increased importance. First-party data will become the new ad targeting fuel. Instead of relying on AI-driven lookalike segments, brands can rely more on data from their own loyal customers giving information in exchange for something they value – all managed in environments they directly control.

Why aren’t brands already effectively doing this at scale already? Some are, but implementation is hard, which is why brands relied on third-party data in the first place. To really make first-party data work, you need technology infrastructure and buy-in across an entire brand organization – including CIOs, CDOs and CTOs to practitioners in product, UI, content development and beyond. GDPR-style legislation could force marketers’ hands to get this right.

First-party data is only great if you have it. For the brands without direct customer relationships, second-party data gained from brands that do is key.

Of course, a shift toward privacy means it’s inevitable that there will be less data overall for marketers to use in marketing and advertising. But that doesn’t have to be a bad thing, as marketers return to neglected fundamentals like contextual targeting and creative excellence.

In terms of context – or where ads run – a flight to quality is long overdue. Any advertiser reading recent headlines on ads running before offensive content knows that user-generated content run amok can undermine brand trust in an instant. Given recent breakthroughs in major broadcasters and OTT providers embracing private marketplaces, advertisers don’t necessarily need to lose scale or targeting with a flight to quality.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Digital ad creative is also due for a renaissance. Ad blocking arose because people hated ads – and went out of their way to get rid of them. Less data available for targeting makes creative all the more important to break through the noise, and it’s likely needed in an industry that has overengineered for direct response metrics such as clicks or site visits.

Ultimately, brands are in the business of delighting their customers and delivering great experiences, not creeping them out or monetizing their data. Privacy can be a positive part of that experience. Think of an airline explaining through a just-in-time notice in its app why access to GPS data is needed to help users find their cars upon returning from a trip.

Respecting privacy builds trust with customers – and that’s good for everyone.

Follow Adobe Advertising Cloud (@AdobeAdCloud) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.