Home Data-Driven Thinking How The SPAC Boom Can Reshape The Digital Media IPO

How The SPAC Boom Can Reshape The Digital Media IPO

SHARE:

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.  

Today’s column is written by Patrick O’Leary, CEO at Boostr.

If last year was any indication, 2021 is going to be the year of the SPAC for digital publishers. SPACs – or Special Purpose Acquisition Companies – are “blank check” investment instruments used to take companies public without passing through the traditional IPO process. This formerly little-used tool is gaining popularity across the investor ecosystem and is a particular draw for digital media and ad tech players who have typically struggled to break into the public markets.

Just last month, content syndication giant Taboola took itself public with a SPAC and a valuation of $2.6 billion. Later this year, Group Nine Media will take the same path, having already taken its own SPAC public on January 15th. Further, Buzzfeed is considering a similar move, and a number of media-focused investors are raising money for SPACs which puts much of the digital media landscape in play.

With all this activity, two questions remain: Why is the SPAC boom happening now? And what does the rise of SPAC IPOs mean for the digital media ecosystem?

The timing is right

The simple answer is that there’s pent-up demand among media investors. The digital publishing and ad tech boom that began over a decade ago hasn’t produced many of the big exits that early investors expected, and the public markets haven’t been particularly welcoming to digital media ventures. SPACs provide an exit for early investors and allow companies with strong brands and businesses to enter the public market without the wilting scrutiny of a traditional IPO. Add to that the role COVID-19 has played in accelerating digital transformation, and many investors see this as a unique time of unparalleled opportunity.

SPAC benefits

There’s been a significant amount of consolidation in digital publishing and ad tech, particularly among companies with $25-75 million in revenue, often considered the IPO sweet spot. With rapid consolidation and a dwindling number of large strategic acquirers left on the field, SPACs provide an alternative to endless rounds of venture capital and a way to circumnavigate the skepticism about the digital media sector.

SPACs also offer a faster and more efficient path to going public. A traditional IPO involves considerable regulatory and financial hurdles, along with a great deal of public scrutiny and review. These practices can slow down the IPO process, a difficult pill to swallow for digital media players who are accustomed to reinventing big pieces of their business at regular intervals as conditions in the ecosystem change.

This adaptability is usually a strength, but it can create frustration during a traditional IPO process designed for less dynamic businesses. While a traditional IPO can unfold over several years, recent SPAC IPOs have been executed within a few months. This speed makes them more appealing to business leaders in the fast-changing digital media space, especially those looking to quickly raise money to accomplish specific goals.

Finally, going public through a SPAC gives publishers more control over the terms of their public offering. Company management is able to negotiate the exact terms of the purchase, eliminating the price uncertainty that makes traditional IPOs such a gamble. While the valuation may be lower than what a company might otherwise receive, the ability to control price creates a level of stability and predictability for employees and long-term investors that isn’t otherwise possible.

Considerations with using SPAC 

SPAC IPOs are not without their drawbacks. If you want to build the next Condé Nast or Disney, going public may be a critical step that allows you to raise money to finance the kind of growth that a world-class media business requires. However, it also means opening your books to investors on a quarterly basis and being more responsive to shareholder needs and growth targets. For many digital media entrepreneurs who are used to the long horizon of private companies, ensuring consistent short-term results and a high stock price will be an adjustment.

Also, nothing in this world is free. The expediency of a SPAC IPO comes at a cost. Paying out early investors means taking on new ones who don’t know your business as well. Going public means meeting obligations to shareholders and being responsible to a board, sometimes composed of new members with different ideas. Fortunately, many of these concerns can be managed ahead of time in the structuring of the SPAC acquisition.

Finally, while now looks like an opportune time to go public as investors are responding favorably to SPAC offerings, there’s a reason many companies are waiting longer to go public today than during the dot com boom of the 90s. While many digital publishers have waited a long time to go public, others may find that it’s too soon even if the added cash holds appeal for investors and equity-holding staff members. Going public too early can create long-term problems for businesses that aren’t ready for the responsibilities that come with being a public company.

The big picture

While the SPAC boom is in its early days, a few things are already clear. For the first generation of digital-native publishers – like BuzzFeed, Vice, and Vox – SPACs may offer a long-awaited exit opportunity for media brands that have become household names without ever breaking through to the public markets. The same may be true of the ad tech sector which, in many ways, has charted a parallel course alongside digital publishers only to likewise be shut out of the public markets by investor skepticism about the industry.

What remains to be seen is how these newly public digital publishers and potential ad partners will behave and how their obligations to the markets may shape their trajectory going forward. Going public means curtailing some of the big dramatic strategy pivots that have defined digital publishing and advertising technology industries over the last decade in favor of creating predictable, stable, recurring revenue results. If most major players in the digital media space take themselves public in the coming months and years, it’s likely to reshape the way the entire digital ecosystem operates in unexpected ways.

Follow Boostr (@boostrcrm) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Tagged in:

Must Read

Kickbacks Takes An Outsider’s View While Bringing Ads To AI Agents

Andrew McCalip is a founding engineer at Varda Space Industries, where he oversees the manufacturing of things like hypersonic reentry vehicles and satellite buses.

CTV Buyers Are Getting The Show-Level Performance Optimization They’ve Always Wanted

A collaboration between InterMedia Advertising, Peer39 and Pontiac Intelligence provided show-level cost-per-acquisition data for 94% of CTV ad impressions.

Advertisers Await Programmatic Pause Ads

The IAB Tech Lab is working on standardizing programmatic signals for new streaming TV ad formats, including pause ads. Meanwhile, many brands are eager to add pause ads to their repertoire.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Why Media Mergers And Spin-Offs Don’t Always Keep Their Promises

With media megamergers, acquisitions and spin-offs left and right, the media landscape is changing at a pace that is difficult to keep up with.

TransUnion is partnering with Blockgraph so that advertisers can use its identity data to target, reach and measure TV households across channels.

How This Disaster Relief Nonprofit Tapped First-Party Data To Reach Donors Year-Round

Staying top of mind for potential donors is an ongoing challenge for Direct Relief. Nexxen’s audience curation helped it spread and sustain awareness.

Why Major UK Publishers Are Finally Joining Forces To Curate Ad Inventory

Atria’s collective approach is a response to growing monetization challenges and the need to protect the value of human journalism in the AI era.