Home Data-Driven Thinking GDPR Will Test Brand Equity

GDPR Will Test Brand Equity

SHARE:

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Henry Hyder-Smith, founder and CEO at Adestra.

Over the past couple of years, one topic prevails whenever marketers, data professionals and executives get together: the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation and its expected effects.

Companies are learning how to interpret and implement the law, meeting with attorneys and spending time and money to prepare their organizations for the May implementation deadline.

While GDPR will have an extensive impact on business, at its core it requires companies to become more transparent about data privacy and collection. This affects how we handle data, treat our customers and communicate with them.

All the confusion and frustration over GDPR seems to boil down to one thing: We are not used to providing this level of transparency.

In effect, it becomes a tenet of our brand equity.

Adding Transparency To Brand Equity

Rarely has brand equity involved permission or ceding control to customers. The company has always been the one to control the conversation.

What makes many CEOs and business owners nervous about GDPR is not necessarily the far-reaching regulations. What bothers executives is giving up control to customers.

Under the law, they must let the customer decide how great the brand equity is and whether the value exchange of customer information for products or services delivered is equal or greater.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

As these conversations have evolved, I’ve come up with three areas that are ripe for change to comply with GDPR and boost brand equity.

Company Culture

Now that companies must confront their attitudes toward data transparency and customer control, they will find they must change their corporate culture. This means moving beyond simply saying that the customer is at the center of advertising and marketing, but truly putting customers at the heart of the business. C-level executives must participate, listen to direct customer feedback and pass learnings down the organization to help move the “customer-centric” needle.

The C-suite must also set new KPIs for all teams that account for more transparency. Teams must take into account the customer control, permission and transparency aspects of the relationships they have with customers.

Technology

Technology companies are farthest away from customers but closest to end users because they’re the ones developing the tools and functionalities that affect the customers’ experience with the business.

Too often this happens in a vacuum. Technologists need to be in touch with what customers need and want.

At the same time, technology companies must educate and empower employees who are at the leading edge of what customers expect from products and services. Education on the tech side of the business about brand equity will help employees understand the customer’s power to control data, give or retract permission to use that data and embrace the “right to be forgotten.”

Customers

Companies must update their customers to let them know about the changes and the control they are being granted. This message must be authentic, encapsulate the existing brand equity and explain the steps undertaken.

Companies can either blame the law or embrace it, showing customers how they are entitled to share or withhold their permissions and data. Companies that will thrive under GDPR are those that become gateways to customer permissions, rather than roadblocks.

A Final Thought

GDPR has so many layers that we’ll interpret it long after the May deadline passes. We’ll be better served if we all admit that the key to the law is that we must be authentic in granting our customers control over their data.

Transparency must be the buzzword of the day. C-level executives must be advocates for that transparency or customers will find it elsewhere.

Follow Adestra (@Adestra) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Intent IQ Has Patents For Ad Tech’s Most Basic Functions – And It’s Not Afraid To Use Them

An unusual dilemma has programmatic vendors and ad tech platforms worried about a flurry of potential patent infringement suits.

TikTok Video For Open Web Publishers? Outbrain Built It.

Outbrain is trying to shed its chumbox rep by bringing social media-style vertical video to mobile publishers on the open web.

Billups Launches Attention Measurement For Out-Of-Home

Billups, a managed services agency that specializes in OOH, is making its attention measurement solution and a related analytics dashboard available for general use.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria

The Google Ad Tech Antitrust Case Is Over – And Here’s What’s Happening Next

Just three weeks after it began, the Google ad tech antitrust trial in Virginia is over. The court will now take a nearly two-month break before reconvening for closing arguments right before Thanksgiving.

Jounce Media's Chris Kane at Programmatic IO NY on Sept. 25, 2024.

The Bidstream Is A Duplicative, Chaotic Mess – But It Doesn’t Have To Be That Way

Publishers are initiating more and more auctions – but doesn’t mean DSPs are listening to more bids, according to Chris Kane.

Readers Are Flocking To Political News, Says WaPo – And Advertisers Are Missing Out

During certain periods this year, advertisers blocked more than 40% of The Washington Post’s inventory over brand safety concerns.