Home Content Studio Moving Away From MTA And Toward A Better Model Of TV Measurement

Moving Away From MTA And Toward A Better Model Of TV Measurement

SHARE:

The advertising industry’s shift from last-click attribution to multi-touch attribution (MTA) initially promised a deeper understanding of marketing effectiveness. However, limitations like signal loss and the ineffectiveness of non-clickable media like TV have emerged.

Even with standardized identifiers like cookies and MAIDs (mobile advertising IDs), MTA remains challenging. As a result, many have reverted to media mix modeling (MMM) and are exploring other creative solutions.

Despite these obstacles, some continue to advocate for multi-touch through techniques that essentially filter out traffic from other sources, which merely rebrands last-click attribution. This trend is particularly concerning in TV measurement, where many solutions already present an inflated picture of performance.

Verified attribution is not a silver bullet

Verified attribution, which isolates TV ad impact by filtering non-TV traffic, has a major flaw: It ignores the influence of unclicked-on ads.

Imagine a user sees a brand’s social media ad but doesn’t click, only to later see a TV commercial for the same brand and visit the website. Traditional models might credit the TV ad entirely, neglecting the initial social media exposure. This overlooks the power of social impressions.

Despite low click-through rates across social platforms (e.g., Meta’s average CTR range is 0.73% to 2%), most impressions (99.1%) still influence consumer behavior later in the customer journey. Discounting them inflates TV’s impact, just as cost-per-click (CPC) metrics overemphasize paid search – or as last-click attribution underestimates the impact of non-clickable media. Instead of relying on closed-loop MTA, marketers should focus on data science and MMM to understand incremental performance.

If not MTA and not Verified attribution, what to use instead?

The answer depends. Modern solutions like Tatari use a combination of baseline+lift models and IP-level matching (with or without device graphs) for linear and streaming TV, respectively.

These models are realistic and highlight TV’s incremental value. Still, they have limitations. For one thing, they primarily benefit digitally native brands. Brick-and-mortar advertisers might find greater success with traditional methods like geo-testing.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

These models (like Tatari) seek a direct causal relationship between a TV ad and an outcome (e.g., a sale). However, consumers experience touch points across channels, each contributing to the response.

For larger, established marketing operations, therefore, MMM offers a more holistic approach to TV measurement by assessing the overall impact of the marketing mix across different channels. This method helps optimize budgets and understand channel interactions, which is crucial for strategic planning. While MMM requires significant data and time investment, recent technological advancements have enhanced its efficiency and accessibility, making it a viable option for comprehensive and actionable insights.

The Bottom Line: Embrace Complexity

Attribution is messy, but our message is nevertheless loud and clear: Remain vigilant and question the feasibility of models promising complete or near-perfect attribution – looking at you, Verified attribution – and carefully select your measurement methodology based on your situation, even if it is old school. Consider using multiple models to triangulate for the real answer.

For more articles featuring Philip Inghelbrecht, click here.

Must Read

Comic: Gamechanger (Google lost the DOJ's search antitrust case)

DOJ v. Google: How Judge Brinkema Seems To Be Thinking After Week One

Where the DOJ v. Google ad tech antitrust trial stands after one week’s worth of remedies arguments.

Swish, A Company That's Bringing Programmatic to Product Sampling, Announces Seed Funding

Swish, a startup that partners with retailers to provide product full-size CPG samples to people doing their grocery shopping online, announces $2.3 million in seed funding.

DOJ v. Google: During Opening Arguments, The DOJ And Google Battle Over An AdX Divestiture

Court is back in session. And the fate of  the open internet is in the balance.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Chris Mufarrige, director, Bureau of Consumer Protection, FTC

FTC Consumer Protection Chief: No Easy Answers On Privacy, ‘Only Trade-Offs’

Privacy isn’t black-and-white, says the FTC’s Chris Mufarrige, promising evidence-driven consumer protection cases under the Trump administration.

How Encryption Keys Could Resolve The TID Furor

Rather than sharing universal TIDs that any DSP or curator can access, Raptive says publishers should instead share encrypted TIDs with an encryption key provided only to trusted demand-side partners.

Clear Channel Brings Mid-Flight Measurement To Its OOH Network

Clear Channel will provide advertisers weekly, mid-flight reports on outcomes driven by its inventory in order to bring OOH measurement closer to the speed of digital.