Home Analysts Analyst: DG Unlikely To Get A Better Bid Than Rival Extreme Reach

Analyst: DG Unlikely To Get A Better Bid Than Rival Extreme Reach

SHARE:

DG and Extreme ReachDigital ad management provider DG will likely face serious questions from its shareholders amid rumors that the company rejected a $20 dollar per share bid from video ad services company Extreme Reach.

While Irvine, TX-based DG possesses some advantages in the digital marketplace, particularly thanks to last year’s $414 million acquisition of ad tech firm MediaMind, which added a number of sales offices and expanded its global reach. But that deal, along with the purchase of Enliven Marketing Technologies four years ago, has also contributed heavily to DG’s heavy debt load, which limits its appeal to other potential buyers and lenders.

Extreme Reach’s offer, backed by PE firm Providence Equity Partners, according an unidentified source cited by Reuters, was valued at $550 million. DG spurned the bid from Extreme Reach over anti-trust concerns, though sources AdExchanger spoke to doubted that as a reason, saying that the two companies combined annual revenues from TV distribution are in the $300 million range (roughly $450 million if MediaMind and internet ad dollars are factored in), suggesting that it was too small to register with regulators, noted Mark Zgutowicz, a senior research analyst for Piper Jaffray.

There are obvious complements, especially in the area of the connected TV ad serving, between the hardware-based DG and the cloud computing services from Extreme Reach, which is headed by former executives with Fastchannel, which merged with DG in 2006. (DG eventually dropped Fastchannel from its name.)

In assessing the prospects of the two companies,  Piper Jaffray’s Zgutowicz told AdExchanger, “This is a two-player race and a zero sum game.”

“There’s competitive fire between these two,” Zgutowicz added. “But I am surprised the bid was rejected. If you’re a shareholder, I think you would question the move. There isn’t another potential bidder who can match that price, and in our view, unlikely even at the $12- $13 level. There is no one [in the space] that can bring the kind of immediate synergies that an Extreme supported deal can. DG has about $460 million in debt. So if you’re going to make a bid at $12-$13, you’ll have to write a check for $350 million on top of that.”

At the moment, DG appears to be only entertaining offers from PE firms like Bain Capital and, according to a Bloomberg BusinessWeek report, investment bank RDG Capital, which already has a 4.9 percent stake in DG. (DG declined to address these reports, saying it does not respond to “market rumors or speculation”; Extreme Reach representatives did not return a message seeking comment.)

But Zgutowicz said he was “hard-pressed to believe a private or strategic buyer would be able to create synergies and scale efficiencies without Extreme’s leading low-cost cloud-based technology, which has essentially destroyed scale efficiencies in DG’s TV distribution business.”

So what about DG’s MediaMind? Doesn’t that contribute enough of a value proposition on top of DG’s TV distribution in its rivalry against Extreme Reach? Not really, said Zgutowicz, since internet accounts for only 15 percent of DG’s total EBITDA compared to 85  percentDG gets from TV .

“Extreme is building the same online distribution capabilities in house,” the analyst said. “MediaMind has a bigger name, but DG already overpaid for that after seeing revenue growth run into a wall in Q1 at MediaMind. The only value MediaMind brings to DG is if they could synergize with their existing TV sales channel (which is what DG professed when the acquired it), but they can’t because TV and online is bought by different people today at agencies. So its just another business running alongside TV, which DG adds very little value to.”

By David Kaplan

Must Read

Meta’s Ad Platform Is Going Haywire In Time For The Holidays (Again)

For the uninitiated, “Glitchmas” is our name for what’s become an annual tradition when, from between roughly late October through November, Meta’s ad platform just seems to go bonkers.

Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

Closing Arguments Are Done In The US v. Google Ad Tech Case

The publisher-focused DOJ v. Google ad tech antitrust trial is finished. A judge will now decide the fate of Google’s sell-side ad tech business.

Wall Street Wants To Know What The Programmatic Drama Is About

Competitive tensions and ad tech drama have flared all year. And this drama has rippled out into the investor circle, as evident from a slew of recent ad tech company earnings reports.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: Always Be Paddling

Omnicom Allegedly Pivoted A Chunk Of Its Q3 Spend From The Trade Desk To Amazon

Two sources at ad tech platforms that observe programmatic bidding patterns said they’ve seen Omnicom agencies shifting spend from The Trade Desk to Amazon DSP in Q3. The Trade Desk denies any such shift.

influencer creator shouting in megaphone

Agentio Announces $40M In Series B Funding To Connect Brands With Relevant Creators

With its latest funding, Agentio plans to expand its team and to establish creator marketing as part of every advertiser’s media plan.

Google Rolls Out Chatbot Agents For Marketers

Google on Wednesday announced the full availability of its new agentic AI tools, called Ads Advisor and Analytics Advisor.