Home AdExchanger Talks Brand Safety Is Critical – But Don’t Overdo It

Brand Safety Is Critical – But Don’t Overdo It

SHARE:
Mia Libby, SVP of enterprise, The Wall Street Journal

It’s become a cliché by this point that no advertiser wants to end up on the cover of The Wall Street Journal because of a brand safety scandal.

But that fear has caused “a massive overcorrection,” says Mia Libby, the WSJ’s SVP of enterprise, on this week’s episode of AdExchanger Talks.

It’s okay – and an advertiser’s right – to be cautious about brand safety. It’s their money after all. But excluding all news from programmatic media plans isn’t the answer, she says.

And the fact is that many advertisers are still using the blunt instrument of overly conservative keyword exclusion lists, and it’s to their own disadvantage.

“I understand that there are many news sites and many spots that are not necessarily suitable for certain brands,” she says. “But all of us should not be under that same umbrella by any means, and I would like to see some more nuance.”

Nuance both in how advertisers think about brand safety and in terms of the technology they use to protect themselves from running against unsavory content.

And here’s the irony: There’s been research to prove that ads adjacent to quality news stories about sensitive topics don’t have a negative impact on engagement, and yet overzealous keyword blocking does, because it limits a brand’s reach.

The Wall Street Journal has worked with advertisers, for example, that wanted to avoid running against any mention of an entire country, which affected the deployment of their campaign.

“No one is advocating for running with news everywhere – every single type of news across every platform,” Libby says. “But brands like The Wall Street Journal, which is known for its journalism and its standard of ethics – these are the places where brands should feel really comfortable running adjacent to news.”

Also in this episode: Libby’s Hulk Hogan connection, her take on GARM’s categorization of breaking news and op-ed coverage and why WSJ parent company News Corp’s recent licensing agreement with OpenAI isn’t a deal with the devil. Plus: What you can do to support Evan Gershkovich, the WSJ reporter who’s been falsely accused of espionage and held in a Russian prison since March 2023.

Must Read

CleanTap Says It Easily Fooled Programmatic Tech With Spoofed CTV Devices

CleanTap claims that 100% of the invalid traffic it spoofed was accepted into live auctions run by programmatic platforms and was successfully bid on by advertisers.

HUMAN Expands Its IVT Detection Tool Kit With A New Product For Advertisers, Not Platforms

HUMAN has recently started complementing its bid request analysis by analyzing the time between when a bot clicks an ad and when the landing page loads. Now it’s offering the solution to individual advertisers.

Index Exchange Launches A Data Marketplace For Sell-Side Curation

Through Index Exchange’s data vendor marketplace, curators gain access to third-party data sets without needing their own integrations.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Can Publishers Trust The Trade Desk’s New Wrapper?

TTD says OpenAds is not just a reaction to Prebid’s TID change, but a new model for fairer, more transparent ad auctions. So what does the DSP need to do to get publishers to adopt its new auction wrapper?

Scott Spencer’s New Startup Wants To Help Users Monetize Their Online Advertising Data

What happens when an ad tech developer partners with a cybersecurity expert to start a new company? You end up with a consumer product that is both a privacy software service and a programmatic advertising ID.

Former FTC commissioner Alvaro Bedoya speaks to AdExchanger Managing Editor Allison Schiff at Programmatic IO NY 2025.

Advertisers Probably Shouldn’t Target Teens At All, Cautions Former FTC Commissioner

Alvaro Bedoya shared his qualms with digital advertising’s more controversial targeting tactics and how kids use gen AI and social media.