Home Ad Exchange News Google VP Mohan Addresses Agencies About The Display Landscape And RTB

Google VP Mohan Addresses Agencies About The Display Landscape And RTB

SHARE:

RTB LoveOn the heels of a new Google-sponsored Digiday study, Google continues to fan the flames of display as VP of product management Neal Mohan has just published a missive on the Google Agency Ad Solutions blog entitled, “The Three Laws of Display Advertising Physics.” Read more about “the laws.”

In the post, Mohan purposefully mixes his metaphors between physics and the financial markets when describing how and why he says clients – particularly agencies – are choosing between a demand-side platform and Google Display Network.

Also, he highlights some sweet stats for real-time bidding lovers including:

  • “88% of buyers plan to buy via RTB in 2011, up from 75% last year.”
  • “47% of media buyers say that the benefits or RTB will increase their overall digital advertising budget this year (16% said it would not, 37% were unsure).”
  • “29% of media intermediaries (such as DSPs, ad networks, and exchanges) anticipate their volume of real-time bidding will increase by 100% or more versus last year. 19% believe it will go up by at least 200%.”

AdExchanger.com spoke briefly with Mohan about specifics on inventory on the Google Display Network and the DoubleClick Ad Exchange.

AdExchanger.com: Can you clarify what inventory is moving through the Google Display Network and being auctioned through DoubleClick Ad Exchange?

NEAL MOHAN: (…) The Google Display Network (GDN) has access to all the inventory that’s in the Exchange. On the supply side of our Exchange is where our millions of AdSense publishers are plugged in as well as inventory that our largest, DoubleClick for Publisher partners choose to put up for auction as well. GDN has access to all of that.

AdExchanger.com: To drill down, the AdSense publishers – save the text-based inventory – is put up for auction through the DoubleClick Ad Exchange?

NEAL MOHAN: One of the things that gets overlooked is that text inventory – to the extent that its running in ad slots that are interchangeable with (graphical) display ads – is also eligible to run through the the Ad Exchange. The beauty of the model is that publishers can configure it whichever they want. (…) The way the Ad Exchange works is that both of those types of inventory formats can be handled in the Ad Exchange.

AdExchanger.com: If you’re buying from DoubleClick Ad Exchange (essentially the “guts” of Google Display Network) through a demand-side platform like Invite Media, isn’t it just like buying an ad network? After all, there is a revenue share agreement between the publisher and Google AdSense or DFP. Wouldn’t you say they’re both ad network models?

NEAL MOHAN: I think there’s a big distinction and that’s why I like the stock broker analogy. (…) One of the big differentiators of Invite Media is the service that we provide -but essentially it’s a white-label service. It’s expert advice, and customer support, and technical insights as needed versus the much more full-service, end-to-end stock broker type model that’s reflected in the Google Display Network.  I think that’s not a trivial difference to overlook.

(…) My vision is that the technology on the back end is that it’s about both (audience and context) technologies  – both are available through the buying model you prefer. From Google’s perspective we want to provide either one.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

 


 

Ad Exchange Or Ad Network

DoubleClick Ad Exchange underpinnings seem to remain a publisher ad network on its back end as AdSense grabs fat margins via exchange bidders. – Can’t really blame Google with its competitive advantages of scale and technology continuing to drive the rev share black box on a per impression basis with publishers.   Everybody’s making money and as long as that happens, and publishers remain happy, there’s no reason to stop.

Moreover, let’s say Google did start exposing the “charge” to rev share publishers on a per impression basis (e.g. Google came out and said it would take 25% of the revenue of each impression sold) to the buy and sell-sides of the exchange.  Would it matter? Again, it would seem as long as liquidity remains strong and drives publisher yield, perhaps not. The competition could start using the publisher “charge” against Google saying we only charge 10% or whatever. (And maybe the buy-side would be more inclined to go “direct” to the publisher?) Yet, real-time biddable tech combined with overwhelming liquidity could overcome the cost issue as, most importantly, yield remains strong.

It’s still early days with RTB, but not as “early” as last year! – looking forward to see this addressable media world go cross-digital-channel with global frequency capping and better attribution for the marketer.

By John Ebbert

Must Read

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.

Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.