Home Ad Exchange News Correction: On Our Story About Facebook Exchange Frequency Capping

Correction: On Our Story About Facebook Exchange Frequency Capping

SHARE:

facebook exchangeA story reported here yesterday was missing some key nuances in how the Facebook Exchange will work. The below is our clarification and correction based on new information shared by Facebook and its DSP partners.

Sources told AdExchanger yesterday, and Facebook confirmed at the time, that frequency capping would not be possible through the new Facebook Exchange – nor would view-through tracking or impression tracking.  We also noted the technical challenges inherent in the requirement that advertisers upload creative to Facebook and submit to a hybrid human/automated approval process.

We passed this on to readers, but not all of it was accurate.

As it turns out, frequency capping will work on the Facebook Exchange, as will impression tracking. However, Facebook says, “We don’t have view through at this time.”

It’s important to understand the method for impression tracking is substantially different from what programmatic media buyers are used to. Facebook DSP partners tell us it will function not by allowing third party ad servers to drop a cookie, but through a technical process intended to protect the security of Facebook’s social graph data.

“In a sense, after you serve the ad, the confirmation comes back from Facebook that gets recorded by the DSP,” said Mike Baker, CEO of DataXu, one of Facebook’s eight approved partners. “They’re passing us our IDs. It’s a workaround so that the social graph data is not unintentionally leaked outside of Facebook. That’s why they don’t like to have the pixels put in there.”

AdExchanger regrets the error! Please bear with us while we continue to shine a light on the Facebook Exchange.

-Zach Rodgers

Tagged in:

Must Read

Comic: Gamechanger (Google lost the DOJ's search antitrust case)

For Google Advertisers Who Overpaid The Monopoly – Don’t Hate, Arbitrate

“The underlying misconduct at the heart of our claim is that Google had monopoly power and abused it, and that led to higher prices because, of course, monopolists charge more than the free market,” said Ashley Keller, the attorney bringing thousands of arbitration suits against Google.

Can An AI Solution Fix Misaligned Marketing Orgs?

Opal launched Gem, a new AI solution, to help large brands unify the layers of media and tech within their organizations.

Sports Publisher On3 Tries AI Recommendations To Keep Engagement In Its Home Court

Mula’s AI native content feed helps On3 keep its engagement and RPS consistent amid traffic drop-offs to publisher sites and the growing scarcity of online attention.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: Race To The Bottom

Hearst Built A Unified Ad Marketplace To Simplify Omnichannel News Buys

Hearst is stitching together its far‑flung news properties into a single programmatic marketplace to simplify buying local news and shore up its business as the ad market shifts.

Northbeam Adds The Third Leg Of The Attribution Stool With Incrementality Testing

There’s MMM and MTA, but no single ad measurement works for brands with multiple points of sale. On Tuesday, Northbeam launched an incrementality tool to complete what it calls “the trifecta of digital attribution.”

Comic: The Great Online Privacy Battle

What Regulators Talk About When They Talk About Ad Tech

If you want to know what privacy regulators think about online advertising, it’s not a mystery. Just listen to what they’re saying.