Home Data-Driven Thinking Super Bowl Ads Call For Big Game Analytics

Super Bowl Ads Call For Big Game Analytics

SHARE:

george-musi-ddt“Data Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by George Musi, Head of Cross-Platform Analytics at DG MediaMind.

The Super Bowl, which will air Feb 3rd, draws the year’s largest TV audience. Last year’s game set a new record for the most-viewed TV program in history, drawing 111.3 million viewers across the U.S. and tens of millions more around the world.

The massive, real-time audience gives brand marketers unparalleled opportunity to reach a broad cross-section of the U.S. population simultaneously, a rare opportunity in light of media fragmentation. Furthermore, a significant part of that audience will tune in for the commercials — in some cases as much as for the game itself. An appealing venue for brand marketers? Indeed.

This year, advertisers are paying an average cost of $4 million (a record high) for 30 seconds of airtime. Companies will pay millions more to film and produce their commercials, increasing total investment. That means the Super Bowl represents perhaps the biggest marketing investment an advertiser may make in a single media property all year.

In an era of greater advertising accountability, where every dollar is under heavy scrutiny (particularly by the CEO), it is critical for brand marketers (even more seasoned TV advertisers) to justify the huge marketing investment.

Ultimately, each marketer will define success of their Super Bowl ads relative to its advertising objectives and role for their brand and business, which might include many data points, from raising awareness to incremental sales, revenue, and profits.

Although there are different lenses (or many different indices) that can be used to evaluate the advertising impact, the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics that are commonly used are as follows:

Media Measurements

  • Media Metrics
    • TV, Online & Cross-platform Impressions, Reach, Frequency, GRP
  • Brand Metrics
    • Awareness
    • Message Recall & Association
    • AttitudesFavorability
    • Consideration
    • Purchase Intent
    • Trial, Repeat Purchase or Brand Switching
    • Preference
    • Likeability
  • Social Media Metrics
    • Social (Brand, Product & Commercial) Mention Reach, Passion & Frequency
    • Buzz Generation
    • Chatter / Comments
    • Consumer Engagement & Activation
    • Reactions
    • Emotional Response
    • Followers
    • Favorites
    • Social Bookmarks
    • # of Video Downloads
    • YouTube Views & Ratings
    • Facebook Likes/Fans/Friends
    • Twitter Followers & Mentions
    • Tweets (TPS -Tweets Per Second), Including Celebrity Tweets
    • Tweeter Conversations – Reach, Frequency & Velocity
    • Google+
    • Pins
    • Tumblr Posts
    • Tags
    • Shares (Amplification Rate)
    • Stumble
    • Reddit
    • And more KPIs
  • Action Metrics
    • Clicks
    • Web Traffic
    • Brand Searches
    • Lead Generation or Long-Tail
    • Sales, Revenue & Profits
    • Direct Response

We should recognize the potential power (and important role) of social media and online video (which are increasingly becoming an integral part of the Super Bowl marketing mix), and no longer only rely on the historical bias of measuring big game ads mostly by media metrics (reach, GRP’s and Nielsen ratings) and old-school methodologies (panels, surveys and polls) with their associated cognitive biases.

It’s a whole different measurement game, because of the availability of new technology (think Second Screen), big data analytics, and a plethora of metrics that offer the ability for deep dive and quantitative analysis of the Super Bowl ads. Brand marketers (and their agencies) will have to continue to adjust (and extend) their measurement tactics as their Super Bowl campaigns evolve, balancing the relationships between traditional and new/emerging data, analytics and metrics (they are not created equal), to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness and impact of their Super Bowl ads on target consumers. However, don’t expect it all to get figured out anytime in the near future. Like most other measurement questions, I don’t think that there is going to be one standard way to determine the overall effectiveness and ROI of Super Bowl advertising.

In the end, Super Bowl spots will need to meet two distinct measurement requirements – one measurable based on traditional TV scoring, and another based on unique dynamics (and a far more complicated mix) of cross-platform paid, owned and earned metrics (before, during, and after the game). To make the most out of their Super Bowl commercial videos, brand marketers should look at the whole picture, which means measuring and quantifying the total impact effect (and full return) of the Super Bowl video campaign, not only game-day impact.

Taken together, this multivariate approach provides a comprehensive measure of a Super Bowl ad’s effectiveness, which can be compared against other (proprietary) databases to assess relative, as well as absolute, effectiveness.

Advertisers can leverage these insights to guide strategic and tactical (pre-, in- and post-game) planning decisions toward improving Super Bowl paid, owned and earned marketing performance for years to come and to inform campaigns for other major live events such as the Olympics, Academy Awards, and March Madness.

Follow DG MediaMind (@DGitNetwork) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

New WBD Report Makes The Case For Getting The Measurement Basics Right

Warner Bros. Discovery has a new white paper analyzing the data and methodologies of five top video measurement providers: VideoAmp, iSpot, Comscore, Innovid and Samba.

Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

Google And The DOJ Filed Their Proposed Final Judgments In The Ad Tech Case – Here’s What They’re Still Arguing About

Google and the Department of Justice filed the next round of paperwork that will determine what Google’s punishment will look like in the ad tech antitrust case.

T-Mobile Brings Its Mobile Data Exclusively To Vistar To Scale Up DOOH Targeting

Advertisers can now use Vistar to activate both off-the-shelf and custom audiences built on T-Mobile’s first-party location and app data.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Apple Has Far-Reaching Plans To Block Hundreds Of Programmatic Data Companies From iOS

Apple’s WebKit crackdown appears to extend well beyond The Trade Desk, putting hundreds of ad tech, data and identity vendors on a mysterious, dynamically updated block list.

Josh Reed, Zoom's VP of brand and content, speaking at AdExchanger's Programmatic IO event in New York City (September 28, 2006)

Zoom’s Marketing Challenge Is That It’s Too Well Known For Its Own Good

Zoom has 99% unaided brand awareness, which sounds great on paper. But there’s a catch: Most people still think it’s just a video-call app.

Why Agencies Think They Shouldn’t Own Agentic AI Tools Or The Data Used To Build Them

Agencies are differentiating their tech stacks by building custom agentic AI tools for their clients. And they’re rethinking owning those AI tools – particularly since licensing them creates new revenue streams.