Home The Sell Sider A Balanced Approach to Working With Ad Networks

A Balanced Approach to Working With Ad Networks

SHARE:

The Sell Sider“The Sell-Sider” is a column written by the sell-side of the digital media community.

Ben Barokas is Chief Revenue Officer of AdMeld, a publisher yield optimization company.

The Publisher vs. Ad Network thread is among the industry’s oldest and most provocative. There’s been a requisite panel about it at nearly every conference over the past few years, and just when the debate seems to simmer down, another flare-up puts it back on everyone’s radar. Technology is bringing change, but strategy and policy is a big part of the solution. Here are a few suggestions to help publishers navigate these waters:

  1. Develop an inventory management strategy and socialize it across your entire organization.
    Practices like selling the same inventory simultaneously on multiple exchanges are open invitations to arbitrageurs and can be deadly to your bottom line without the proper approach and analytics.
  2. The world has enough “blind” inventory. The value of inventory without provenance or context is essentially zero, and networks won’t buy it. If you choose to sell blind on an exchange, maintain pricing discipline by setting floors across categories and audiences.
  3. Demand transparency. Ask your networks for an advertiser list for what they’re running right now, and if you’re using RTB, ask your technology partner. Not enough publishers do this, and it fosters more business and better relationships.
  4. Stop the reselling. Advise your networks that if they don’t have the demand, it is NOT ok to source demand from other networks, especially via the exchanges. This is your best route to eliminating low-quality creative and malware.

I’d be remiss if I didn’t say it: yield optimizers have gone a long way towards smoothing these relationships and simplifying transactions. Many of the publishers still grappling with these issues would benefit from engaging one. As the landscape becomes more complex, it pays to have a partner that can apportion your inventory correctly and has the relationships and technical capabilities to aggressively enforce your business rules.

Follow AdMeld (@admeld) and AdExchanger.com (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Tagged in:

Must Read

Amazon’s Interactive CTV Ad Suite Now Includes Creative Optimization

Amazon Ads expects this year’s television upfronts to be an outcomes-focused affair. That may explain why the company preempted its Monday evening presentation by announcing the launch of a new ad product called Dynamic TV Creative.

Is Agentic Commerce An Oasis Or Mirage?

For companies like Shopify, Criteo and Instacart – and even for giants like Amazon and Walmart – figuring out if the agentic oasis is real or a mirage is their priority No. 1.

PubMatic’s Agentic AI Is Going Beyond Direct Deals

PubMatic has run more than 30 fully autonomous, end-to-end agentic campaigns through the SSP’s AgenticOS platform, in addition to more than 1,000 direct publisher deals.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

The Trade Desk Has A Grand Vision, But Needs A New Breed Of CMO To Make It A Reality

TTD CEO Jeff Green laid out the DSP’s plan for winning in a new world of advertising that – AI aside – necessitates major changes in how marketers behave.

A Publisher Didn’t Get Its UID2 Setup Right. The Trade Desk Didn’t Notice. What Went Wrong?

TTD confirmed that this CTV publisher’s errors would have made its UID2s useless for ad targeting. But TTD also said it wouldn’t have had enough information to flag the issue.

Criteo Faces Tough Headwinds Until Agentic AI Ad Revenue Materializes

Criteo shares dropped by 20% Wednesday morning after the company reported shaky Q1 earnings and revised its guidance downward for the rest of the year.