Home The Big Story Buying Ads In The Rabbit Hole

Buying Ads In The Rabbit Hole

SHARE:

Programmatic buyers, who constantly find themselves buying ads in unexpected places, should cut themselves some slack. Being a media buyer was much easier in the days of Mad Men, when there were about three channels to watch, whose content was regulated by the FCC

Now, media buyers spend across millions of channels, and there is weird stuff across a good chunk of them – if you can even find the URLs.

YouTube’s Content ID, a copyright protection system, was designed to automatically recognize popular movies and music reposted to the platform, and ensure that rightsholders are paid for that use.  In practice, however, some accounts upload live sports games, Hollywood blockbusters and Netflix hits to YouTube, racking up views until (and if) Content ID finds them.

Sometimes, these accounts bypass YouTube’s protections by changing the video to something innocuous once a video has done well enough to attract a little too much attention. That’s an issue for content owners, but also for buyers: since these URLs are often not disclosed (or have the new URL) in buyers’ campaign reports, they don’t know exactly where their ads appeared.

Our senior editor, James Hercher, details the latest YouTube bombshell from Adalytics, which AdExchanger covered, along with The New York Times.

Freedom from AI bots?

Then, we turn to Cloudflare’s announcement that it will block AI bots for publishers, cleverly branded right before the Fourth of July as “content independence day.” Pageviews are hemorrhaging due to AI Overviews and people seeking information through agentic AI interfaces.

But will blocking bots help? Is it even possible? With Andrew Byrd, who writes for our sister publication, AdMonsters, we go into what AI bot blocking might mean for publishers who are grappling with new content discovery behavior unleashed by AI.

Must Read

Comic: Gamechanger (Google lost the DOJ's search antitrust case)

DOJ v. Google: How Judge Brinkema Seems To Be Thinking After Week One

Where the DOJ v. Google ad tech antitrust trial stands after one week’s worth of remedies arguments.

Swish, A Company That's Bringing Programmatic to Product Sampling, Announces Seed Funding

Swish, a startup that partners with retailers to provide product full-size CPG samples to people doing their grocery shopping online, announces $2.3 million in seed funding.

DOJ v. Google: During Opening Arguments, The DOJ And Google Battle Over An AdX Divestiture

Court is back in session. And the fate of  the open internet is in the balance.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Chris Mufarrige, director, Bureau of Consumer Protection, FTC

FTC Consumer Protection Chief: No Easy Answers On Privacy, ‘Only Trade-Offs’

Privacy isn’t black-and-white, says the FTC’s Chris Mufarrige, promising evidence-driven consumer protection cases under the Trump administration.

How Encryption Keys Could Resolve The TID Furor

Rather than sharing universal TIDs that any DSP or curator can access, Raptive says publishers should instead share encrypted TIDs with an encryption key provided only to trusted demand-side partners.

Clear Channel Brings Mid-Flight Measurement To Its OOH Network

Clear Channel will provide advertisers weekly, mid-flight reports on outcomes driven by its inventory in order to bring OOH measurement closer to the speed of digital.