Home On TV & Video Local TV Needs Open Standards For Automated Buying And Selling

Local TV Needs Open Standards For Automated Buying And Selling

SHARE:

On TV And Video” is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in advanced TV and video.

Today’s column is written by Shereta Williams, president at Videa.

Local TV advertisers and broadcasters have heard it time and time again: “Digital’s got it all figured out.”

And then, “Why can’t you be more like digital?”

TV will likely take on some of digital’s attributes, but for now we have a few things to work out: The lack of standardization is holding back the local TV ad industry from fully embracing automation.

TV automation platforms have entered the market, but they are mostly incompatible, leaving agencies and stations unable to transact across multiple systems easily.

The market ​demands ​​a unified buying experience where none exists, so TV stations have no choice but to use manual steps to work across different systems, adding time and complexity. With the amount of technology at our disposal to create interfaces that work across platforms, it doesn’t have to be this complicated.

Unfortunately, the available technology isn’t the problem – the issue is industry buy-in.

Conversations about open standards for automated buying and selling are taking place, largely fueled by a group of local TV broadcasters including Sinclair Broadcast, Tribune Media, Tegna and Nexstar, which joined forces last year to create the TV Interface Practices (TIP) Consortium.

The group aims to develop standards-based interfaces to accelerate automated advertising transactions, enabling local TV broadcasters and their media agency partners to work with any automation platform that adopts these standards. 

Creating standards where none exist

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

While eMarketer estimates that more than 80% of display ads are now bought and sold programmatically, only 2.8% of TV advertising is transacted that way.

That offers a mismatch for marketers who have adapted so much of their buying to programmatic and would welcome TV automation. Marketers are also increasingly asking for greater insights to track their campaigns’ performance and more transparency during the buying process.

How open standards can tip the scales

Open standards would help to remove inefficiencies in the current buying and selling process. Local TV stations face workflow challenges in securing the best price for inventory because they need to estimate ratings for future inventory – a manual process that weighs on transaction efficiency.

Instead of buyers and sellers wasting as much as 30% of their time on manual steps, they could put their minds to tackling challenges such as proper attribution and audience targeting through data. Open standards would allow this type of data to surface.

Open standards and interoperability don’t imply assimilation or monopolization, but quite the opposite. APIs would allow all of these different platforms to exist alongside and communicate with each other, rather than putting up silos between competitors and cordoning off achievements. The TIP initiative is also reusing previous file formats and pooling resources to create better workflows and accuracy of information and data. 

The next steps: conversation and collaboration

TIP is making good progress so far. Last November, the group contacted more than a dozen systems providers that offer components of local TV transactions and spot buying. [Disclosure: Videa was among the providers contacted.] The group will use that research to offer a set of APIs to support the electronic transfer of transaction data. The local broadcast TV trade association, TVB, is partnering and acting as a repository for the group’s work.

Despite the progress, there are still difficult conversations to be had. This worthy investment will cost money, and the industry needs to recognize the undeniable value of such an investment before agreeing to fund it.

Open standards are a necessary component in the future of automation in the TV ad industry. With enough cooperation among industry players, instead of constant comparisons to digital, TV will evolve to include the best of both worlds: incredible reach and engagement paired with ease of access and accountability.

Follow Videa (@VideaLLC) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger).

Must Read

Amazon Ads Is All In On Simplicity

“We just constantly hear how complex it is right now,” Kelly MacLean, Amazon Ads VP of engineering, science and product, tells AdExchanger. “So that’s really where we we’ve anchored a lot on hearing their feedback, [and] figuring out how we can drive even more simplicity.”

Betrayal, business, deal, greeting, competition concept. Lie deception and corporate dishonesty illustration. Businessmen leaders entrepreneurs making agreement holding concealing knives behind backs.

How PubMatic Countered A Big DSP’s Spending Dip In Q3 (And Our Theory On Who It Was)

In July, PubMatic saw a temporary drop in ad spend from a “large” unnamed DSP partner, which contributed to Q3 revenue of $68 million, a 5% YOY decline.

Paramount Skydance Merged Its Business – Now It’s Ready To Merge Its Tech Stack

Paramount Skydance, which officially turns 100 days old this week, released its first post-merger quarterly earnings report on Monday.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
The Arena Group's Stephanie Mazzamaro (left) chats with ad tech consultant Addy Atienza at AdMonsters' Sell Side Summit Austin.

For Publishers, AI Gives Monetizable Data Insight But Takes Away Traffic

Traffic-starved publishers are hopeful that their long-undervalued audience data will fuel advertising’s automated future – if only they can finally wrest control of the industry narrative away from ad tech middlemen.

Q3: The Trade Desk Delivers On Financials, But Is Its Vision Fact Or Fantasy?

The Trade Desk posted solid Q3 results on Thursday, with $739 million in revenue, up 18% year over year. But the main narrative for TTD this year is less about the numbers and more about optics and competitive dynamics.

Comic: He Sees You When You're Streaming

IP Address Match Rates Are a Joke – And It’s No Laughing Matter

According to a new report, IP-to-email matches are accurate just 16% of the time on average, while IP-to-postal matches are accurate only 13% of the time. (Oof.)