Home On TV & Video Grading YouTube’s Latest Brand-Safety Safeguards

Grading YouTube’s Latest Brand-Safety Safeguards

SHARE:

On TV And Video” is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in advanced TV and video.

Today’s column is written by Dominique Netto, head of client services at [m]PLATFORM – GroupM.

After the brand-safety sagas of 2017, Alphabet appears to be using some of that $27.7 billion Q3 revenue to further develop brand safety across YouTube.

There is no hiding behind the user-generated content defense, which is essentially like building a school for children without employing any teachers to ensure no wrongdoing.

I’m glad to see it making some serious updates, but is this a ploy for more advertising dollars or a genuine push to make the platform a safer hub?

Human Gatekeeping

 The most effective approach to blocking content at this stage is a combination of machine learning and manual vetting. Despite YouTube’s announcement in August that AI can be better than humans at detecting extremist content, it is now releasing 100% human-verified videos across the Google Preferred ad product in a push to get more advertisers to buy premium inventory.

Google Preferred is one of the biggest revenue drivers for YouTube, and when 250 advertisers left during last year’s boycott, it needed to save its reputation. But Google Preferred ads only account for the top 5% of YouTube content, making it a very small safe pool.

Reports indicate the company will hire 10,000 people by the end of 2018 to identify and pre-empt violative content. Considering it will take 10,000 people to vet Google Preferred, which only represents 5% of YouTube content, it would probably need closer to 200,000 people to manually vet videos across the entire platform.

I would have liked to see YouTube also prioritize manual vetting across more sensitive categories, especially child safety. Prioritizing brand safety on its premium ad product gives the appearance that it is focusing on its biggest profit opportunity. What about the other 95% of content not being 100% verified?

Third-Party Alliances

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

After its reluctance to integrate with any third parties, YouTube is now opening up its partnerships list. The platform is already integrated with Moat and OpenSlate and is working through IAS and DoubleVerify partnerships.

You can evaluate risk after the ad has already appeared and run across curated channels only, but no current integrations allow brands to block an impression before it is served next to offensive content.

I look forward to other developments in this space, especially with image recognition and ad blocking. Until we can successfully block an ad from showing across violative content, brands are still open to risk.

Monetization Policy

The requirements for the YouTube Partner program have changed from 10,000 views at a channel level to 4,000 hours of watch time within the past 12 months and 1,000 subscribers. Monitoring audience engagement, community strikes and spam have also been introduced to add another layer of security. This has reduced the number of YouTube partners by cutting out all the smaller players, but will it also cut out the risky players?

YouTube will probably spend less on resources needed to monitor the decreasing number of partners, but I don’t think the changes are drastic enough to make a real difference in terms of brand safety. Fraudsters will adapt to new regulations and create new ways of generating bot views and subscribers. I predict YouTube’s next move will be to increase the price of Preferred inventory because it’s even more premium now.

It took a slew of bad news stories and advertiser losses for YouTube to start making brand-safety changes. The recent updates are aimed at improving brand safety on its premium ad products, which generate the most revenue. But I think there is a lack of focus on brand safety across most of the content on the platform. As a platform creator, YouTube must perform due diligence to be a guardian of the content it’s hosting.

Follow GroupM (@GroupMWorldwide) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Comic: Lunch Is Searched

Based On Its Q3 Earnings, Maybe AIphabet Should Just Change Its Name To AI-phabet

Google hit some impressive revenue benchmarks in Q3. But investors seemed to only have eyes for AI.

Reddit’s Ads Biz Exploded In Q3, Albeit From A Small Base

Ad revenue grew 56% YOY even without some of Reddit’s shiny new ad products, including generative AI creative tools and in-comment ads, being fully integrated into its platform.

Freestar Is Taking The ‘Baby Carrot’ Approach To Curation

Freestar adopted a new approach to curation developed by Audigent that gives buyers a priority lane to publisher inventory with higher viewability and attention scores than most open-auction inventory.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: Header Bidding Rapper (Wrapper!)

IAB Tech Lab Made Moves To Acquire Prebid In 2021 – And Prebid Said No

The story of how Prebid.org came to be – and almost didn’t – is an important one for the industry.

Discover Wiped Out MFA Spend By Following These Four Basic Steps

By implementing the anti-MFA playbook detailed in the ANA’s November report, brands were able to reduce the portion of their programmatic budgets going to made-for-advertising sites to about 1%.

Welcome to the Cookie Complaint Department

PAAPI Could Be As Effective For Retargeting As Third-Parties Cookies, Study Finds

There’s been plenty of mudslinging in and around the Chrome Privacy Sandbox. But the Protected Audiences API (PAAPI) maybe ain’t so bad, according to researchers at Boston University.