Home On TV & Video Data, Addressability Driving Seismic Shift As TV And Digital Converge

Data, Addressability Driving Seismic Shift As TV And Digital Converge

SHARE:

lornebrownupdated“On TV And Video” is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in programmatic TV and video.

Today’s column is written by Lorne Brown, CEO at Operative.

I believe impressions will win over gross rating points (GRP) as digital and TV converge. Impressions are more granular, allow for better targeting and create better measurability.

But I think the real change is not simply a change of metric. It’s one of power and control in the advertising ecosystem and it’s driven by several factors, including consumer behavior, addressability and data.

Consumers use a lot of different screens, and they want to watch what they want to watch, when they want to watch it. Content providers are keen to meet consumer demand, but many of the middlemen in the TV market have created unfriendly environments. So the world has started to move around them.

By 2018, over-the-top (OTT) ad revenue is predicted to top $30 billion, according to the Diffusion Group. That’s more than half of today’s TV market.

So whether the TV establishment embraces the change quickly or not, innovators are growing quickly enough to force the change. As a result, every major player in TV has no choice but to plan for a future where consumers get what they want. Advertisers will expect content to be addressable, too. That means they will want more targeting and granular control over media buying than TV affords today.

In an addressable future, data is the currency. We can see everywhere the signs of data working its way into the TV market as cable companies amass the most powerful positions that they can. Many companies already allow for impression-based spot buying, and companies like Visible World provide some form of programmatic TV buying that allows for digital-style audience targeting.

As these programs grow, programmers need the data that the cable companies own, as well as the capabilities cable companies possess, such as video on demand and addressable insertion. Verizon’s acquisition of AOL is the result of the unbalance of those in the ecosystem who need and have data or content.

Advertisers Want ‘And’

While advertisers want to buy one audience (convergence), media companies must aggregate that audience across an array of channels and screens (divergence).

For advertisers to have it all, digital and linear addressable inventory will need to coexist with GRP-based inventory. Monday Night Football will be sold alongside an upfront sponsorship model and an impressions-based audience.

Advertisers want to reach their consumers on mobile AND tablet AND television.

They want shows AND targeting AND frequency capping.

Just because new ways to reach audiences are coming into existence doesn’t mean the old ways are out. Marketers want it all, and they want it optimized.

Cable media companies need to offer a single view of the consumer. The future of TV and video, at least from an advertising perspective, will end up looking like portfolio management, allowing publishers to market and sell an audience in a single transaction. Universal presentation of a media company’s supply will be key.

Change Is Inevitable

The infrastructure will not be easy to create, but it will get done.

As consolidation continues, media companies will partner with each other, whether it’s done opportunistically or as a last resort. It’s possible that in the future there will only be 50 media companies that participate in cable-packaged bundles, the big ones having absorbed the smaller ones that can’t keep up or don’t fit in. Linear will become addressable in order to stay competitive.

But there will always be a new innovation that those in the market will add to their portfolios. Coexistence is key. One proposal, IO and invoice will create a single yield curve that incorporates all available inventory and matches impressions with buyer types. The mature publishers that are able to make this all work without killing business profits will be the ones left standing.

Follow Operative (@Operative) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Josh Reed, Zoom's VP of brand and content, speaking at AdExchanger's Programmatic IO event in New York City (September 28, 2006)

Zoom’s Marketing Challenge Is That It’s Too Well Known For Its Own Good

Zoom has 99% unaided brand awareness, which sounds great on paper. But there’s a catch: Most people still think it’s just a video-call app.

Why Agencies Think They Shouldn’t Own Agentic AI Tools Or The Data Used To Build Them

Agencies are differentiating their tech stacks by building custom agentic AI tools for their clients. And they’re rethinking owning those AI tools – particularly since licensing them creates new revenue streams.

Programmatic IO: Insurers Are Building Ad Tech’s AI Accountability Layer

Agencies and marketers discussed the future of AI governance at AdExchanger’s Programmatic IO NYC this week. The main takeaway? Expect insurers to play an increasingly important role in managing AI compliance.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Apple’s Latest Operating System Blocks The Trade Desk From Serving Ads On Safari

The Trade Desk is unable to serve ads to the Safari browser for Apple device owners that have downloaded iOS 27. Apple has been investigating the issue since last week.

Who Will Stand Up For The Open Web?

The open web is done, stick a fork in it. Banner blindness is near universal, search traffic has run dry and publishers are struggling for oxygen. But what if that’s … not true?

A comic showing lab techs as stand-ins for legislators experimenting with provisions for US state privacy laws, including restrictions on collecting sensitive data.

What Publishers Don't Know About New Jersey’s Data Broker Law Could Cost Them

Attention, publishers: Although you might not think of yourself as a data broker, in the great state of New Jersey, that’s not really your call anymore.