Home Digital TV and Video Waiting For The Addressable Online Video Ad Business

Waiting For The Addressable Online Video Ad Business

SHARE:

Addressable VideoAt first blush, recent acquisitions in the video ad network space give the appearance the video ad business is on fire – in a good way.

But, digging deeper, it seems that exits may not be happening at the levels first imagined for some video ad network entrepreneurs and investors as there have been quite a few entrants flooding the category and, except for a few working on differentiation through technology, the only other real differentiation seems to be scale. And, it’s no wonder scale is important as all anyone ever hears about is the incredibly high CPMs in online video ads.

From here, there appears to be three factors involved in the high CPMs:

  • Engagement – As everyone knows, having to sit through a 15 second pre-roll ad is a very different experience than viewing (for an instant) a graphical display ad which might be to the side or above the website content.
  • It’s Like TV – Online video ads remind the marketers and their agencies of television and buying TV spots. This mindset creates tons of demand especially as the marketer struggles to follow the user online.  Much to their detriment, marketers and agencies often use TV spots for online video ads without any customization for the Web.
  • Scarcity – There just isn’t a lot of available, non-guaranteed video ad inventory unless you’re willing to use the social network world’s supply of sometimes questionable, non-brand-safe content.

As long as the video ad campaign is providing overall reach in this limited, online video ad universe, it appears marketers are willing to spend top dollar.  But shouldn’t the real goal be addressable video advertising which uses demand-side platform-like buying technology, looks more at the user and cookie-level data, and targets accordingly? You know… audience buying!?

And, on top of audience buying, how about cross-channel attribution? Video ad targeting should ideally take into account the separate viewing of display advertisements from the same campaign, for example, and understand how the two digital marketing channels affect each other on the way to the final conversion.

Not Yet

It’s just too “early days” for most addressable video since there’s limited inventory and even more limited audience targeting opportunity.  The video ad network and the publisher will still be offering website placement, vertical channels and context for the forseeable future as opposed to targeting through a deeper understanding of attribution or intent. It feels like display a few years ago when supply was more limited and the long tail wasn’t as long.

To be sure, companies are moving into the addressable media space for online video. But today’s limited supply continues to preclude the need to go very deep. Display’s over abundance of supply bred innovation. When will it crossover to online video?  In part, when marketers become more comfortable with their brands in social media’s video and as the web user continues to consume more video online – and, finally, IP brings the web to the TV.  Also, if comScore released a study called “Natural Born Viewers” (echoing “Natural Born Clickers“) that might have people looking beyond “the view” and into cross-channel attribution.

By John Ebbert

Must Read

The Arena Group's Stephanie Mazzamaro (left) chats with ad tech consultant Addy Atienza at AdMonsters' Sell Side Summit Austin.

For Publishers, AI Gives Monetizable Data Insight But Takes Away Traffic

Traffic-starved publishers are hopeful that their long-undervalued audience data will fuel advertising’s automated future – if only they can finally wrest control of the industry narrative away from ad tech middlemen.

Q3: The Trade Desk Delivers On Financials, But Is Its Vision Fact Or Fantasy?

The Trade Desk posted solid Q3 results on Thursday, with $739 million in revenue, up 18% year over year. But the main narrative for TTD this year is less about the numbers and more about optics and competitive dynamics.

Comic: He Sees You When You're Streaming

IP Address Match Rates Are a Joke – And It’s No Laughing Matter

According to a new report, IP-to-email matches are accurate just 16% of the time on average, while IP-to-postal matches are accurate only 13% of the time. (Oof.)

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: Gamechanger (Google lost the DOJ's search antitrust case)

The DOJ And Google Sharpen Their Remedy Proposals As The Two Sides Prepare For Closing Arguments

The phrase “caution is key” has become a totem of the new age in US antitrust regulation. It was cited this week by both the DOJ and Google in support of opposing views on a possible divestiture of Google’s sell-side ad exchange.

create a network of points with nodes and connections, plain white background; use variations of green and grey for the dots and the connctions; 85% empty space

Alt Identity Provider ID5 Buys TrueData, Marking Its First-Ever Acquisition

ID5 bought TrueData mainly to tackle what ID5 CEO Mathieu Roche calls the “massive fragmentation” of digital identity, which is a problem on the user side and the provider side.

CTV Manufacturers Have A New Tool For Catching Spoofed Devices

The IAB Tech Lab’s new device attestation feature for its Open Measurement SDK provides a scaled way for original device manufacturers to confirm that ad impressions are associated with real devices.