Home Data Cookie Clearinghouse Director: ‘Surveillance Sales’ Will Have To Go

Cookie Clearinghouse Director: ‘Surveillance Sales’ Will Have To Go

SHARE:

CookieTwo weeks after unveiling the “Cookie Clearinghouse,” a joint project between Mozilla and the Stanford Center for Internet and Society that would determine which websites are allowed to set cookies, Mozilla execs and CIS director of privacy Aleecia McDonald shed more light on the project today at a public discussion.

“This initiative is about creating a Web that people expect,” said Mozilla’s SVP of business and legal affairs, Harvey Anderson, at Mozilla headquarters. “We believe there are all kinds of constituents on the Web. We’re not trying to undermine those who are commercially driven, but to provide a Web experience that respects the consumer.”

The Cookie Clearinghouse will introduce two lists: one that will allow sites to set cookies for tracking user behavior and another for those that would be blocked. The purpose of the Clearinghouse is not to list “every single site on the Internet,” McDonald said. “It’s too hard for people to individually decide which sites to allow or block … We’re looking to get to a common point where most people are and let individuals manage those exceptions on their own.”

An advisory board that includes a privacy officer at Opera Software, a computer-science professor at Princeton University and a privacy engineer from Mozilla will work with McDonald to develop the criteria for the lists.

While the advisory board will include only a handful of members, the board will seek feedback from a user group and business council, according to McDonald. The board is accepting volunteers for the two groups.

McDonald argued the Cookie Clearinghouse will affect publishers and advertisers only minimally.

“Behaviorally based advertising is in the single digits of number of ads that are currently shown online,” she maintained. “The hope for the Cookie Clearinghouse is to have a situation where advertising continues, but some of the tracking is limited for users who wish it to be. There’s still plenty of ways for users to make money online but the idea of surveillance sales is probably going to have to be replaced with permission marketing.”

The goal is to roll out the lists within a few months for browsers and other interested parties to begin testing, McDonald added.

Prior to working on the Clearinghouse, McDonald was a co-chair of the World Wide Web Consortium, charged with creating a Do Not Track browser mechanism. After what many described as a divisive and unfruitful process, she stepped down last year and was replaced with Peter Swire, a privacy professional and experienced negotiator.

Must Read

Why Big Brand Price Increases Will Flatten Ad Budgets

Product prices and marketing budgets are flip sides of the same coin. But the phase-in effects of tariffs, combined with vicissitudes of global weather and commodity production, challenge that truism.

The IAB Tech Lab Isn’t Pulling Any Punches In The Fight Against AI Scraping

IAB Tech Lab CEO Anthony Katsur didn’t mince his words when declaring unauthorized generative AI scraping of publisher content “theft, full stop.”

Comic: Gamechanger (Google lost the DOJ's search antitrust case)

Here’s Who’s Testifying During The Remedy Phase Of Google’s Ad Tech Antitrust Trial

Last week, the DOJ and Google filed their respective witness lists and the exhibit lists for the remedy phase of the ad tech antitrust trial. Lots of familiar faces!

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

MX8 Labs Launches With A Plan To Speed Up The Survey-Based Research Biz

What’s the point of a market research survey that could take weeks, when consumer sentiment is rollercoasting up and down every day? That’s the problem MX8 Labs aims to tackle.

Closeup image bag of money and judge gavel. Lawsuit, auction, bribe and penalty concept.

The LG Ads Legal Saga Continues With A Fresh Suit, This Time Against Kroll

Alphonso co-founder Lampros Kalampoukas is suing Kroll for allegedly undervaluing the company by nearly $100 million to aid LG Electronics in a shareholder dispute.