Home Data-Driven Thinking The Winners And Losers In The Impression ‘Rightsizing’ Event

The Winners And Losers In The Impression ‘Rightsizing’ Event

SHARE:

Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Judy Shapiro, founder and CEO at engageSimply.

I don’t believe it’s an overstatement to suggest we are witnessing the first real rightsizing of digital media impressions since ad tech became dominated by the quest for scale.

Starting now and over the next 24 months, we will see a perceptible reduction of impressions driven by a combination of factors, including General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Ads.txt and even blockchain. Add Apple’s ad-tracking prevention and social media’s fake account purge and I predict we will see 50% of today’s impressions evaporate into digital thin air, based on data I’ve seen internally and from agency and ad-serving partners.

In times of market turmoil, inevitably there are winners and losers, and here is how I see it stacking up.    

The big losers

The biggest losers in this rightsizing event are the publishers, ad networks and content syndication platforms whose businesses are totally or partially dependent on scale instead of quality.

We are already seeing the first losers in toolbars, mobile apps and retargeting platforms being impacted by Ads.txt and GDPR. This represents the first 10% of impressions to disappear.

The next group of losers over the next 12 months will be impressions that come from social networks, page arbitraging, keyword site builders and ad networks with a lot of indirect publishers. By this time next year, I would say another 15% of impressions will be shed, especially once Ads.txt gain traction.

Finally, by 2020, I believe early blockchain deployments will wipe out about 30% of impressions coming mainly from middlemen players, such as exchanges and content syndication networks that rely on scale businesses.

Advertisers are also somewhat exposed if they bought upfront impressions that become a stranded asset.

The big winners

The clear winners in this rightsizing event will be advertisers and topic-rich, niche publishers. This new landscape will be leaner and more productive but transitioning to this “new normal” will require both advertisers and publishers, together, to adjust their monetization strategies now in three fundamental areas.

The first area is data. For too long, advertisers have been hard pressed to translate digital impressions into real human results. Now, a new generation of quality impressions are being delivered through topic-rich ad networks focused on human themes that span everything from “sustainability” to “facilities management” within transparent buying platforms. Running campaigns through these independent platforms now is critical to allow advertisers to establish new baselines and modeling data in preparation for new trust metrics reflecting the real world.

The second area is performance. The scale business model created value for behaviors, not real outcomes. It’s time to radically change thinking by linking digital media buying to outcome marketing metrics, such as those that Xaxis has started to do.

This is possibly the most painful transition for advertisers and publishers alike because this requires an industrywide cost realignment to replace the cheap scale metrics with realistic CPA costs commensurate with the quality of outcomes. Despite the challenge, this is a rare moment where new value propositions can be developed going back to real business values.

The final area is targeting. A new targeting strategy will be needed to replace the tonnage targeting model that dominates. The new targeting paradigm will look a lot like pay-per-click in its “mindset” targeting technology, with new ways to target specific, real-time topics within programmatic and other channels. Aside from being GDPR-compliant, topic targeting is a proven to convert audiences as Google’s dominance in digital advertising amply demonstrates.

The industry has been demanding a more accountable ecosystem, but until now it was mostly just talk. Now that low-quality impressions are disappearing, the industry has a chance to evolve through quality and accountable digital marketing.

Follow engageSimply (@engageSimply) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Comic: Measuremints

Nielsen Is Acquiring DoubleVerify For $2.15 Billion

On Thursday, Nielsen entered into a definitive agreement to acquire DoubleVerify in an all cash transaction valued at approximately $2.15 billion.

WBD Hopes To Buoy Linear TV Long Enough For Streaming To Find Its Way

Warner Bros. Discovery cited softer ad sales growth and the continued decline of linear TV as its reasons for missing investor expectations in Q2. Unsurprisingly, streaming ads are the biggest bright spot on WBD’s earnings report card.

Comic: The Mobile Freight Train

AppLovin Asks For Patience As It Grows Its Ecommerce And Consumer Ads Business

“We’re deemed a new bucket, so a testing category,” AppLovin CEO told investors regarding its nascent consumer and ecommerce ads business. “And to graduate up takes time. This stuff compounds over quarters and years.”

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Magnite Doesn’t Want To Be A DSP. It Just Wants To Own The Decisioning Layer

On Wednesday, Magnite CEO Michael Barrett painted a picture of a company that’s edging into the buy side by adding more DSP-style capabilities for planning and activation.

For Cuisinart, AI-Generated Ads Are As Handy As A Kitchen Blender

Cuisinart’s marketing team has been eager to take advantage of generative AI-based creative.

Paramount Skydance Insists The WBD Merger Will Be Good For The Media And Ad Industry

During Paramount Skydance’s Q2 earnings call, CEO David Ellison limited his remarks to a two-minute monologue about the company’s confidence in the intended merger.