Home Data-Driven Thinking Why Private Exchanges Can Be More Than Just A Publisher Tool

Why Private Exchanges Can Be More Than Just A Publisher Tool

SHARE:

paul-rostkowski“Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Paul Rostkowski, president at Varick Media Management.

Online advertising is workflow-intensive, requiring agencies to field large teams of media planners and buyers to deal with orders.

RTB has emerged to free up time, but many agencies equate RTB platforms with poor quality inventory. Although the benefits of purchasing media through a single outlet make buying easier, agencies often avoid it because they don’t want clients thinking they’re aligning ads with low-quality, unwanted content.

Agencies need relief. One possible solution is the private exchange, which to date has been seen as largely aiding premium publishers. But viewing premium exchanges only from the publisher side is short sighted. If agencies look closer, they’ll see that private exchanges alleviate many of the problems associated with RTB.

Agency Priorities

Agencies spend too much time managing low-touch display, video and mobile buys, eating into the time needed for planning high-touch ad executions. “High-touch” refers to anything from custom ad programs, such as homepage takeovers, to content integration. The current model has agencies working with 50 different publisher sales reps to activate low-touch banner buys. Trading desks alleviate the workload, but prioritizing working with private exchanges can take it even further.

Yes, the media will cost more on a private exchange than on open-exchange RTB marketplaces. But that comparison model is slightly misguided because private exchanges should be compared to direct buys, not open-exchange RTB. Agency buyers can easily purchase across premium sites without juggling multiple publisher orders. Working with private exchanges actually reintroduces the classic, old-school ad network model, but in a method that solves many issues that still plague display buying.

Transparency

No issue sullies RTB quite like fraud. Open RTB exchanges are plagued by bad placements or potentially damaging contextual situations for advertisers. The potential for wasted ad spend – and the lack of transparency – keep agencies out of RTB.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Private exchanges can solve this problem. Agencies can pick publishers operating within a private exchange from a menu, introducing the transparency absent from RTB.

And while direct buys offer this transparency, they focus on the content of a page and the perceived value of a publisher, rather than the efficiency afforded by a valuable audience. Private exchanges give advertisers real-time access to consumers, and they can still apply data to discover new audiences or leverage tactics like retargeting. But they have a hybrid direct-buy/RTB approach now, eliminating many transparency concerns.

Open RTB Will Endure

Private exchanges were once referred to as the next wave for RTB. That’s not entirely true. Private exchanges are great tools for agencies and publishers, but that doesn’t mean they’ll cannibalize the open exchange model. In fact, open exchanges will continue to grow – rapidly – because they still provide a benefit to advertisers.

Media available via open exchange RTB is cheaper than premium because it doesn’t have the same appeal to advertisers. Performance-based marketers will always drive a market for cheap inventory. If a campaign is based strictly on retargeting consumers, there’s little incentive to pay $10 when that same cookie costs a fraction of the price on an open exchange.

While there are limits to retargeting, there’s nothing wrong with the exchange approach, especially if ROI is a key success metric. A national banking advertiser wanting consumers to open checking accounts doesn’t need to spend a $10 CPM, and if they do, they probably won’t get their money’s worth.

What private exchanges will do is provide a conduit for agencies to more confidently introduce brand advertisers to RTB. The addition of transparency, planning and audience efficiencies make private exchanges a great tool to help agencies act like leaders for their advertiser clients.

Rather than waste time negotiating multiple direct buys and fighting fraud, agencies can focus on creative executions and important high-touch work for clients. Private exchanges are great tools for publishers to profit off from valuable ad inventory, but agencies need to capitalize on these benefits as well.

Follow Paul Rostkowski (@prostkowski), Varick Media Management (@VarickMedia) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.