Home Data-Driven Thinking One Vendor Or Many? A Checklist For Marketers Weighing The ‘Stack’ Option

One Vendor Or Many? A Checklist For Marketers Weighing The ‘Stack’ Option

SHARE:

hilarykolman“Data Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Hilary Kolman, director of analytics and insight at MEC North America.

There has been a clear shift in digital ad technology during the past several years, with firms that once excelled in specialized areas like ad serving transforming into tech stacks and vying for marketers’ dollars with end-to-end solutions.

More recently, the clear lines between back-end and front-end have blurred as content providers continue expanding the capabilities of service companies they already own or acquire outright.

At a time of consolidation, should you work with a single vendor with a breadth of tech offerings or take an a la carte approach that taps a range of providers?

Well, it depends.

Once Upon A Time

Historically, digital ad-tech companies offered a service. Each had competitors in their core function area but stayed fairly self-contained and focused on one or two key components of digital delivery or measurement. The lines between them were clear and marketers would pick and choose depending upon what was needed.

Some choices were based on the solution offered, while others related to the vendor. For example, a marketer once needed a separate video ad server unless it purchased inventory directly from a publisher. On the audience side, a vendor who could report on demo delivery was crucial for understanding the reach of a campaign against specific targets.

When digital was still relatively new, this divide was inevitable because so much complexity of the medium made it near impossible for any one vendor to meet the full spectrum of needs. Yet as the medium has become more sophisticated – and arguably more complex — ad-tech companies have tried simplifying processes on the back end by developing a broad range of offerings that can be turned into a single-source solution for marketers.

But is this what marketers really need? Is the whole greater than the sum of its parts?

On the surface, it might seem like a plus for a marketer to take advantage of the cost and implementation efficiencies of consolidating multiple streams of business with a single partner. Some, however, aren’t comfortable with leaving all of their proverbial eggs in one basket.

To best match the partner and approach, several key concerns must be addressed:

The Importance Of Data Continuity

Remember that methodology and processes will vary across vendors. Though the services may be similar, they’re not interchangeable. If comparing current campaigns to historical data is a key measure of success for a marketer, don’t consolidate with a new partner.

Are Media Buys Guaranteed On Demo Delivery?

If publisher remuneration is based on the ability to deliver a specific number of demographically targeted unique visitors, similar to posting TV buys, then a vendor that can report on this capability must be part of the solution. Bear in mind that some publishers might place restrictions on the vendor whose numbers they’ll accept, which may impact the decision to consolidate.

A New Need, A New Metric

Perhaps an advertiser that historically focused on direct response and cost per action is now running a brand campaign and wants to understand impact on upper-funnel metrics. If they don’t have a current tech partner that offers this capability, they will need to engage someone new.

Don’t Forget About Cost

Working with a single partner across multiple touch points generally comes at a lower cost than spreading that business across several partners. Processes can be streamlined, freeing up employee bandwidth. Marketers with smaller budgets or manpower constraints may weigh this factor more heavily than an advertiser with a bigger budget or larger implementation team.

It’s imperative that marketers align internally on key priorities and objectives so that agencies can provide strategic guidance around the decision to diversify or consolidate. Working in partnership ensures that the best solution is in place for meaningful, accurate and impactful implementation of digital campaigns.

Follow MEC North America (@MECideas) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Josh Reed, Zoom's VP of brand and content, speaking at AdExchanger's Programmatic IO event in New York City (September 28, 2006)

Zoom’s Marketing Challenge Is That It’s Too Well Known For Its Own Good

Zoom has 99% unaided brand awareness, which sounds great on paper. But there’s a catch: Most people still think it’s just a video-call app.

Why Agencies Think They Shouldn’t Own Agentic AI Tools Or The Data Used To Build Them

Agencies are differentiating their tech stacks by building custom agentic AI tools for their clients. And they’re rethinking owning those AI tools – particularly since licensing them creates new revenue streams.

Programmatic IO: Insurers Are Building Ad Tech’s AI Accountability Layer

Agencies and marketers discussed the future of AI governance at AdExchanger’s Programmatic IO NYC this week. The main takeaway? Expect insurers to play an increasingly important role in managing AI compliance.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Apple’s Latest Operating System Blocks The Trade Desk From Serving Ads On Safari

The Trade Desk is unable to serve ads to the Safari browser for Apple device owners that have downloaded iOS 27. Apple has been investigating the issue since last week.

Who Will Stand Up For The Open Web?

The open web is done, stick a fork in it. Banner blindness is near universal, search traffic has run dry and publishers are struggling for oxygen. But what if that’s … not true?

A comic showing lab techs as stand-ins for legislators experimenting with provisions for US state privacy laws, including restrictions on collecting sensitive data.

What Publishers Don't Know About New Jersey’s Data Broker Law Could Cost Them

Attention, publishers: Although you might not think of yourself as a data broker, in the great state of New Jersey, that’s not really your call anymore.