Home Data-Driven Thinking Data Possession – Not Just Ownership – Is Key To Improving Advertisers’ Results

Data Possession – Not Just Ownership – Is Key To Improving Advertisers’ Results

SHARE:

jeremy-fainData-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Jeremy Fain, co-founder and CEO at Cognitiv.

In a time where big holding companies are expecting all buying to go programmatic – Dentsu is the latest – it is more important than ever that advertisers not only own their data, but actually be in possession of it. Many advertisers may not realize that ownership is not enough or what the difference is.

The benefits of data possession in today’s world of big data cannot be discounted. Without data possession, the advertiser cannot take full advantage of its most valuable asset and, therefore, cannot compete against those who have already learned this lesson.

Owning and possessing data are two very different things. Owning data means you have control over how the data is used. Possessing data means you can use all of the data to get a full view of everything you own across disparate partners. This holistic data set, including advertising campaign results, site visits and customer data, is already helping the most advanced advertisers drive big improvements in ROI. For those not yet centralizing this detailed data, it is lying around in pieces and produces limited understanding and suboptimal ROI.

For years, advertisers have given permission to ad tech partners, such as demand-side platforms (DSPs) and data management platforms (DMPs), to safely collect and use data on their behalf. Programmatic advertising’s healthy ad tech ecosystem has created incredibly detailed and diverse data on every ad impression and user. This data, however, tends to be siloed. 

Where the ad ran, how much it cost, information about the user it was shown to, viewability scores – all these pieces of data are generally possessed by different ad tech partners. New best-of-breed solutions are popping up every day, so this situation is likely to continue for a while. Since all of this data is contractually owned by the advertiser, the advertiser is the only one that has the right to take possession of it all and join it together into an incredibly rich, deep data asset.

As a first step toward data possession, advertisers should begin saving the last six months of historical data from their partners at the most granular level possible – hopefully at the impression or user level.

But what is an advertiser supposed to do with all this data? Today, the beauty is that an advertiser does not have to do anything with it. The marketing and ad tech ecosystem has many uses for this data already and teams of data scientists champing at the bit to get access to it.

An advertiser’s central warehouse can cost minimal amounts of money relative to overall marketing budgets. Even if the “warehouse” is only a collection of raw log files and downloads from vendors, it can serve as the source for improved decisioning, insights and strategies.  It can also serve as a sandbox for those at the agency or advertiser as well as valuable third-party partners to experiment with new analysis, research and technology.

It seems like digital advertising evolves every six months. Cross-device targeting and attribution is no longer science fiction. Native advertising and dynamic creative are delivering improved, personalized calls to action. All of these new pieces of the advertising and marketing ecosystem are being driven by data – and they will drive even better results for the advertiser if they have a more comprehensive data set.

Follow Cognitiv (@TeamCognitiv) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.

Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.