Home AdExchanger Talks Down With Blocklists!

Down With Blocklists!

SHARE:
Rich Raddon, CEO & co-founder, Zefr

It’s not that brands don’t care about supporting the news and good journalism. But an overdependence on keyword blocklists has made it seem that way.

The real problem stems from the fact that advertisers have long had to rely on blunt tools to keep their brands protected, says Rich Raddon, CEO and co-founder of Zefr, a brand suitability provider for walled gardens, speaking on this week’s episode of AdExchanger Talks.

Keyword lists were used regularly during the early days of the internet. ”I guess it was inertia,” Raddon says, but “it stayed in fashion for a long, long time.”

When Raddon would ask a brand about their approach to safety and suitability, they’d often pull out a massive list of keywords.

“And as you went through the list with them, you’d see names like ‘Tom Cruise’ or something,” he says, “and it would be like, ‘What the – oh, that was from 12 years ago when he jumped on a couch.’”

But more transparent reporting about ad placements and better, more sophisticated scoring technology can alleviate concerns and give advertisers more control so they’re less skittish about how and where they spend.

The Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM), which sets standard industry definitions for high-, medium- and low-risk content, has also been a helpful tool, says Raddon, who noted that Zefr’s brand suitability technology uses GARM’s categories.

“You have to speak a common vernacular,” Raddon says. “If you’re not, then you say ‘tomato,’ I say ‘tomahto,’ and we’re talking about the same thing but we’re not communicating.”

Also in this episode: The brand safety challenges of generative AI during a presidential election year, why Zefr focuses on the walled gardens rather than the open web, whether third-party verification on YouTube – or on any platform for that matter – is truly independent (it isn’t) and how the filmmaker John Hughes indirectly set Raddon on his path to launch a brand suitability startup.

[Show notes: Here’s the “broken AI aesthetic” referenced during the second half of the episode, for those who’d like a visual aid.]

For more articles featuring Rich Raddon, click here.

Must Read

Amazon Ads Is All In On Simplicity

“We just constantly hear how complex it is right now,” Kelly MacLean, Amazon Ads VP of engineering, science and product, tells AdExchanger. “So that’s really where we we’ve anchored a lot on hearing their feedback, [and] figuring out how we can drive even more simplicity.”

Betrayal, business, deal, greeting, competition concept. Lie deception and corporate dishonesty illustration. Businessmen leaders entrepreneurs making agreement holding concealing knives behind backs.

How PubMatic Countered A Big DSP’s Spending Dip In Q3 (And Our Theory On Who It Was)

In July, PubMatic saw a temporary drop in ad spend from a “large” unnamed DSP partner, which contributed to Q3 revenue of $68 million, a 5% YOY decline.

Paramount Skydance Merged Its Business – Now It’s Ready To Merge Its Tech Stack

Paramount Skydance, which officially turns 100 days old this week, released its first post-merger quarterly earnings report on Monday.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
The Arena Group's Stephanie Mazzamaro (left) chats with ad tech consultant Addy Atienza at AdMonsters' Sell Side Summit Austin.

For Publishers, AI Gives Monetizable Data Insight But Takes Away Traffic

Traffic-starved publishers are hopeful that their long-undervalued audience data will fuel advertising’s automated future – if only they can finally wrest control of the industry narrative away from ad tech middlemen.

Q3: The Trade Desk Delivers On Financials, But Is Its Vision Fact Or Fantasy?

The Trade Desk posted solid Q3 results on Thursday, with $739 million in revenue, up 18% year over year. But the main narrative for TTD this year is less about the numbers and more about optics and competitive dynamics.

Comic: He Sees You When You're Streaming

IP Address Match Rates Are a Joke – And It’s No Laughing Matter

According to a new report, IP-to-email matches are accurate just 16% of the time on average, while IP-to-postal matches are accurate only 13% of the time. (Oof.)